Sub-Saharan Africans derive up to 19% of their ancestry from an unknown, extinct hominid species not found in Eurasian populations

submitted by TheJamesRocket from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheJamesRocket[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Why bring mixed race individuals into the discussion? If your going to talk about mulattos, then you should talk about hapas as well. In all likelihood, a hapa would be genetically closer to whites than a mulatto.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You dodged the question. Are East Asians less than half Homo sapien?

If blacks aren't the same species in your opinion, and a mulatto is half black, yet is genetically closer to whites than the East Asians are, then it stands to reason an East Asian would also be less human than a mulatto according to your logic.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    East Asians don't have any unknown hominid in their ancestry, and in actuality they cluster pretty close to whites.

    Mulattoes are clustering even closer. Unless you can refute the source you're objectively wrong and will continue to be.