The Russian ‘denazification’ PR disaster

submitted by TheJamesRocket from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheJamesRocket[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's what really matters: the home front. Having western sympathy is pointless because western peoples are powerless.

Yes, but they could have come up with a far better justification for the war than 'denazification.' That line doesn't convince anyone other than the Russian people alone. It leaves them completely exposed to political criticism.

Solzhenytsin was a Russian ultranationalist and traditionalist and firmly advocated for the reconquest of Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.

After 8 years of occupation by Jewish criminals, the Ukraine has virtually been turned into a 3rd world country. Its a complete mess in every sense of the word. Russia stands to gain nothing by occupying the Ukraine. There is no economic incentive to invade them at all, in fact, it will be an economic drain on them. Because after Russia is victorious, they will have to spend billions on nation building.

Putin didn't invade the Ukraine out of a desire to rebuild the USSR, or to conquer lost republics. He did it because they refused to sign the Minsk agreements, because they were hosting NATO troops and weapons systems, and because they were planning to invade the Donetsk. Putin literally had no choice.