all 6 comments

[–]TiwakingTranshumanist Eugenecist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Working for a company hated by blacks and trannies sounds like a great idea!

[–]MosheCircumshteynRabbi Moshe Schlomo Circumshteyn of Tel Avi 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it is because there is a horseshoe effect between extreme 'conventional' 'racism' and extreme 'anti-racism' (or 'reverse racism', 'reverse discrimination', etc.) whereby both opposite ends actually share certain similarities with each other albeit for very different reasons.

This is why I don't think the conservative problematization of CRT really matters: conservatives are (somewhat unusually) actually worse than Leftists and liberals in this regard in the sense that they are the ones trying to keep colourblindness alive. Meanwhile, the Left has moved leftward enough on racial issues such that we're seeing them discard colourblindness on the other side as they approach the Far-Left end of what we might call a racial issues scale. What I obviously hope for is that colourblindness (which for me is evidently the greatest threat) will be torn in half with people forced either to become explicitly anti- or pro-White.

This glassdoor thing seems to exemplify how extreme 'anti-racism' can work in favour of its polar opposite. Instead of hiding identity markers as people who are deeply colourblind and so forth are wont to do, they are actually doing exactly what the ardent 'racists' would themselves do. The only difference is the reasoning behind why colourblindness should be discarded: in their case, to identify and penalize those who are insufficiently 'fuxated' by 'diversity'.

Of course, it is a double-edged sword for them. 'Intolerant' people can simply use this to help avoid whatever kind of 'diversity' they wish, and should do so. That's one price the Critical Race 'Theorists' and other 'anti-racists' have to pay.

As an aside, some of those statistics are stunning. If you look at Amazon, White reviewers only outnumber black reviewers by around 2x, suggesting that Amazon must really go out of their way to accept blacks. At Google, Asians actually very marginally outnumber Whites and thus would be extremely overrepresented, whereas blacks do not seem to be particularly overrepresented. Meta (Facebook) looks to have the least overrepresentation of the big three.

You just know that companies like BlackRock will use this kind of information to really engineer things in their desired direction, i.e. towards the total fuxation of every business in the name of pseudo-progress, especially the ones at the very top. It's ironic that such companies look to be becoming a far larger threat to capitalism than communism ever was.

[–]AidsVictim69 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's ironic that such companies look to be becoming a far larger threat to capitalism than communism ever was.

In what way?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well that’s fucked up.

[–]ifuckredditsnitches_Resident Pajeet 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

So do they identify kike bosses or no that's the real killer feature

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If they do, then this is peak "accidentally based". Seek out jobs with the lowest diversity scores