Has the Bell Curve ruined anyone elses enjoyment of life?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

In a perfect world, having low IQ members of the same race would not matter, and that may have been true thousands of year prior. HOWEVER, the world has changed a lot since the days of hunting with spears, to the point that intelligence is the only way to survive in a capitalist and technological society.

I believe this is what Adolf Hitler was hinting at had the Axis powers won WW2. We should have applied the same selective breeding techniques used to rear healthier and stronger farm animals with that of humans.

It may sound harsh but imagine if you gave birth to a son who was clinically retarded? Sure, you would still love him as a natural reaction, but imagine having to explain to him he could never become an Astronaut, or Physicist or even an Entrepreneur because he lost the genetic lottery? Now repeat this for the millions of other people being born everyday, and we're intentionally creating an oversupply of useless people who will grow up to take away from the system, as opposed to adding to it?

China is ahead of the curve on this. Even in a country that already has a billion people, Jared Taylor pointed out that the Chinese will be the first to practice Eugenics, and successfully raise a new generation who will all be master race tier. From being immune to diseases, to being 7 feet tall, to having an intelligence rivaling supercomputers, reality will hit most people and realize we made a mistake with not carefully choosing our mates much sooner....

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

intelligence is the only way to survive in a capitalist and technological society.

That's the opposite of the truth though.

Capitalism and technology both encourage mindless good-goy thoughts and punish/push away higher level thinking and individual opinions.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Companies like Walmart or Amazon absolutely prey on the weak and stupid to keep their empires alive, but the Men responsible for creating them were absolutely not "mindless goys".

Steve Jobs, Sam Walton, Henry Ford, Elon Musk are not idiots. These guys are the higher level thinkers with individual opinions that are worth trillions.

Want to prove this wrong? Then go ahead and invent a more valuable product or service than all these Men did. I'll be waiting.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

yes, the people at the top were high level thinkers and the like, but that wasn't the point nor is it the point now. The masses are the issue here, and normal people and people with potential get sucked into the trap of "hide form the horrors wrought upon the world by indulging in the degeneracy and other distractions".

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But that's not a survival strategy.

In fact, if all you do is consume, where do you get the money to buy luxuries? You could beg or live on welfare, but those activities pale in comparison to those who work white collar jobs or become successful entrepreneurs.

I don't disagree that the masses do get sucked into this type of system, but they also have a responsibility to free themselves from it. For example, when people run out of money, do they look for a job or join a life of crime? By doing the latter, they stay in poverty or get locked in jail.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The issue is you're looking at this from a lens that ignores outside influence. All of these would be valid questions in a vacuum, but in a just and idealistic society they would be moot and in the current society you have to factor in interference from Jewish vermin and their allies.

One must remember that a vast majority of people are naturally degenerate simply due to survival and natural instincts. Even the brightest and most self-controlling are still slaves in some capacity to their base urges, even if in the most minor and fleeting of ways. The state should exist to prevent these urges from taking over and trying to keep individuals as happy, healthy, and productive as possible.

The modern state is the inversion of this. The ZOG state and its progeny, namely the media, modern capitalism, and other social ills are structured to achieve the exact opposite: keeping people miserable, controlled, dependent on the state to be kept alive by (sometimes literal) tubes and machines, and keeping them unproductive and useless.

Not working should not be an option. Not "he who doesn't work, neither shall he eat", but rather "he who does not work shall be forced to do so".

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, if you follow the news of the last 24 months, most people have come to reject working for the sake of working.

I'm not sure if I mentioned it in this thread already, but the mindless careers like dishwashers, cashiers, factories etc are no longer in high supply. It's McDonalds that is begging people to join them for an extra $1000 bonus, instead of normal people just applying and preying they get a spot.

In fact, I would argue there is a revolution going on that is leading to a more decentralized society. Look at Work from home. Nothing hurts Capitalists more than seeing their workers refuse to come into the office everyday, because most people would rather be at a home and as a result, have more free time to be with their families, while still enjoying the same benefits of getting a paycheck.

All the High IQ people have quickly adapted to this lifestyle change, it's the Low IQ members of society who don't have the same privileges (although to be fair, there are still jobs that can't be made remote. Like construction or farming).

So I share the same goals you do with creating a society that is more happy and healthy and doesn't have to feed into our urges. But once again, the obstacle of genetics prevents us from executing these ideals on a wide scale. If everyone was born with genius intellect, then more people can flee the cities and start their own homestead or look after a community, while still benefiting from the Capitalist system that rewards success.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Insightful comment and very true.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If the point it's just not bothering you, use your high IQ to get rich and start living in a walled community. Simple as.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IMO, I still wouldn't be satisfied.

I mentioned China in my last sentence as an example of a country that could solve this problem permanently. They will most likely be the first country to engineer genetically superior humans, and the impact will be massive.

But therein lies a second problem. If China reaches master race status before the West, then our way of life will no doubt be controlled by them. Similar to when Europeans first met the Native Indians, their guns wiped the floor with their primitive spears.

That's just how important IQ science is. Even if I choose to go hide in a walled community, there's going to be another group out there who will still find us.