you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheJamesRocket 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I'm calling bullshit on this study, 100%. Especially on the tables for bells palsy, thrombosis, myocarditis, and pericarditis. We know that cases of these diseases have exploded since the vaccination campaign began. A study which does not reflect that in its data is immediately suspect. This is the study in question: Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Setting.

The methodology appears to have been chosen in order to 'prove' that the vaccines are safe. Rather than dividing the entire population into a vaccinated vs unvaccinated category, and comparing the rates of disease among them, they chose a much more subjective methodology. They 'randomly' selected individuals who were vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and compared the rates of disease among these sample groups. Thats really not the right way to study the safety of a vaccine. (Oh, and I have no reason to believe they actually were selecting individuals randomly)

This kills the anti-white schizos' argument about the vaccine side effects.

No, it really does not. Not even remotely. The biggest argument against the vaccines are the literal MILLIONS of injurys recorded in the VAERS database. Look at the fucking evidence before you say stupid shit next time. You're quoting an Israeli study with deceptive methodology that trys to muddy the waters about the risks of vaccine injurys.

anti-white schizos'

WTF is this shit? Vaccine skeptics are anti-white now, somehow? That sounds like slander. Explain your reasoning, or STFU.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Methodology makes sense, it isn't random, you have it detailly explained in Figure 1.

Explain your reasoning, or STFU.

More vaccinated the country, less people die of covid, simple as. White people are overrepresented in covid deaths, they are discriminated against when it comes to both vaccination and treatment, which is actual real dangerous precedence, unlike some NWO medical jewish tyranny.

[–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Methodology makes sense, it isn't random,

No, it is subjective and biased. In their own words: ''For each potential adverse event... we individually matched vaccinated persons to unvaccinated persons according to sociodemographic and clinical variables.'' Thats absolutely not how you examine the safety of a vaccine. And again, this is an Israeli study, so there will undoubtedly be selection bias in which individuals are studied.

More vaccinated the country, less people die of covid, simple as.

Only because you believe propaganda.

White people are overrepresented in covid deaths, they are discriminated against when it comes to both vaccination and treatment,

Europe and North America have older populations than Asia and Africa. Also, the virus seems to thrive in temperate latitudes. Whites are discriminated in hospitals. They are not only denied ivermectin and HCQ, but are also put on ventilators and given remdesivir (which is dangerous).

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have no clue what you're talking about... You need patients with similar medical records, similar age, region, etc. if you want to isolate some specific side-effects.

For example in this specific scenario you might come to conclusion that either covid or vaccine give you Tay-Sachs disease, while naturally Jews are more prone to it because of genetics/interbreeding.