Besides Egypt, is there a single most powerful civilization with Brown skin color?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

IQ is the greatest predictor of success in life. Almost no one becomes an Astronaut or CEO while dribbling saliva from their mouth. As a result, the smarter an entire population is on average, the more competent and intelligent leaders can come to power.

The relationship between IQ & Environment have been studied for decades, yet genetic differences have still shown to be bigger factors.

This is proven when you look at College scores. The poorest Whites still outperform the Richest Blacks in school.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/1995-SAT-vs-Income-Education.png

In retrospect, no one has been able to create a diverse society where everyone has the same IQ or social status. In America alone, trillions have been pumped into welfare and other social programs meant to uplift poor blacks or hispanics. The results have been a total failure.

We can never fix these gaps without Eugenics.

And we’re there people before Vikings in America ? Where do you think they came from ? Theory is that the ASEAN people also had ships that allowed them to find South America.

Yes, but those people never caught up to Western Europeans. Hence why Mexico was conquered by the Spanish, and South America was easily handed over to the Portuguese.

The strength of the dollar and significant infra investment by universities and government is a significant reason why Americas middle could create companies that create produce innovators. If you look at leadership of most of these companies, you might see a disproportionate representation of one non white peoples.

Those people came later, and they did not invent those companies. Microsoft existed before Satya Nadella. And same with Pepsi.

It's not really a great point, especially since America is in the middle of a cultural battle, that punishes White people for wishing to be the majority of a government or company. Jared Taylor put out a highly informative video showing just how extreme these anti-white policies really are. Such as companies having their funding removed if too many board directors are White? How is that fair?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HDEpQscdYGDE/

Before you believe the ideas similar to manifest destiny, Monroe doctrine or inherent whites being better, you might want to see history more and examine the biases of people who told you of that too

I tie a lot of my arguments to world history, and while I'll admit I would love to research more non-white countries in depth, I haven't actually come across conflicting evidence that says dark colored nation could manage the world, in the same way many successful white empires have had.

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

I agree anti white polices are bad. But in institutions, these policies hurt Asians more. If anything whites are underrepresented in tech (industry i am familiar with) at the cost of Asians.

I’m not saying IQ is not a predictor nor that a genetic component exists. I’m suggesting that IQ changes occurred to increase IQ in the last many generations because intelligent people (with both genes and habits that developed intelligence) created same or more babies that lower IQ. This can’t be said of the last 30-40years. I also don’t know what eviromenral variables were examined for long term tests. I suspect a lot more exists than was tested.

When you look at world history, try to see it from 2-3 different lenses. It might help make more sense and might address the superiority complex you seem to have developed. If it had not been for a few key battles, maybe you would have been saying something like I can’t come across evidence that “non-Islam kingdoms could manage the world” which to me is also narrow statement.

Like maybe view Christianity from the perspective of Lithuania (last country to christianize)

Maybe the problem is that you think whites should be managing the world or that it was a good thing that they did.

That opinion is a consequence of the evangelical tendencies most western cultures have and the savior complex that the left exhibits.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I agree anti white polices are bad. But in institutions, these policies hurt Asians more. If anything whites are underrepresented in tech (industry i am familiar with) at the cost of Asians.

We still have an example of multiculturalism failing the native people. Asians could volunteer to step down and hand over their careers to competing White citizens. But they haven't done that, so the problem continues to get worse.

I’m not saying IQ is not a predictor nor that a genetic component exists. I’m suggesting that IQ changes occurred to increase IQ in the last many generations because intelligent people (with both genes and habits that developed intelligence) created same or more babies that lower IQ. This can’t be said of the last 30-40years. I also don’t know what eviromenral variables were examined for long term tests. I suspect a lot more exists than was tested.

Racial differences in IQ goes back hundreds of years, and environment has always been taken into consideration. The facts still remain. No one has been able to reproduce a study that says all races have the exact same intelligence. And there's a good reason why.

It contradicts human evolution. Every race evolved different skull shapes & cranial capacity. In Whites & certain East Asians, they are born with the biggest brains on average. But in other groups, they're much more smaller.

This is not a battle that can be won by throwing more money at it. It's like paying a Man to look and act 100% like a Woman. It's impossible, the sex differences were ingrained at birth.

The same is true with intelligence. We could give brown people nutritious food and a safe home, but that does not guarantee they will be smarter than Einstein or Isaac Newton. Meanwhile, you can impoverish white people and bomb their countries via war, yet we still see tons of white geniuses being born anyway. This was literally the story of the Soviet Union. How could a nation that could barely feed itself, launch rockets into Space before India or Africa? It's genes...

When you look at world history, try to see it from 2-3 different lenses. It might help make more sense and might address the superiority complex you seem to have developed. If it had not been for a few key battles, maybe you would have been saying something like I can’t come across evidence that “non-Islam kingdoms could manage the world” which to me is also narrow statement. Like maybe view Christianity from the perspective of Lithuania (last country to christianize) Maybe the problem is that you think whites should be managing the world or that it was a good thing that they did.

History is definitely full of a lot of "what ifs" but truth be told, when there's an understanding of race realism, the patterns always seem to re-arrange themselves into very predictable puzzle pieces.

For example, I listed South Africa in my OP as proof that only White people could transform a desert into a 1st world paradise. When the White people were forced to end Apartheid and hand over their nation to the non-whites, it collapsed overnight. Everything about the crime, school dropout rates and failing economy could be seen miles away, from other African countries that are just as bad or worse.

Maybe the problem is that you think whites should be managing the world or that it was a good thing that they did. That opinion is a consequence of the evangelical tendencies most western cultures have and the savior complex that the left exhibits.

In a perfect world, every nation would have giant walls that stop mass movement of people without passing certain rules.

But since we don't, then yeah, I would a rather a benevolent white nation have the most power and influence in the world.

Since all the other non-white options are shown to be the worse. I would never want to live in Brazil, South Africa, India, China, Iraq, Jamaica etc. The only non-white country that is remotely decent is Japan, but I don't want Japanese people to lose their country.

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

If Japan had a century of colonization destroying its ancient institutions in the name of Christianity and western civilization, then you might not see it as a remotely decent option.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

If Japan had a century of colonization destroying its ancient institutions in the name of Christianity and western civilization, then you might not see it as a remotely decent option.

They had that in the form of WW2. When America stepped into battle, every city was firebombed or blown up with nuclear weapons. The Americans then occupied them and told them to stop worshipping their Emperor as a god.

Yet despite this, Japan is both an economic giant, and a very safe place to live to this day.

The standards for civilization are so high, it makes no sense to complain. If every brown country could admit they made mistakes or failed, they would not all be in last place. But the issue is they would rather blame White people forever.

But if White people are to disappear in the future, then there wont be anyone left to save the third world.

[–]Agni777 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

When you fight a nation, you can at best defeat it one nation. When you govern one, you can make it crumble from the inside. The result ? Many nations that can’t stay together to function under one government.

Let me suggest a few things that could be used to break Japanese civilization.

  1. Create an mythical history that some parts of Japanese population, are actually foreigners who ruled them. Ensure this history is taught in schools, is published in major media and anyone who disagree is immediately deplatformed.

  2. Create a census where everyone irrespective of what they think or know , is forced to choose an ancestor.

  3. Based on this choice some groups are assigned an ancestral heritage either of prosecution of privilege.

  4. The ones that have a history of prosecution get separate representation in all institutes and a quota is created for them.

  5. Ensure that every year academicians are incesntivized to interpret and reinterpret all stories of Japanese glory as a class struggle between different groups.

  6. Create a law of solidarity where crimes against Mythically persecuted groups is specially treated. Undermine all institutes and people using this.

  7. Do this for about than 30 years

Now the division in society will be so great that people will want a foreign power to rule them. They will not be able to agree on anything and no progress on any issue will be made. Successful ambitious individuals will leave the country and the limited pie will force people to infight.

That’s what the process of colonization did. You seem to think that it’s just taxes that were imposed. No it is fault lines that are created, that are deeepend by a colonizer that fracture a society beyond reconciliation. Take a look at Rwanda. The Hutu and Tutsi have a long history of cohabilitation. Neither killed one another en mass. A colonizer rules for 100 years and voila we have genocide.

Japanese society was never subject to that type of infighting. Hence society as a whole could come together to address problems it’s leader saw fit. If instead of forcing the Emoperror to being God, if Americans had created their own emperor equivalent for Japan then maybe you would see the harm. This is what American seems to have done in Iraq after removing Saddam (intentionally or accidentally)

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That’s what the process of colonization did. You seem to think that it’s just taxes that were imposed. No it is fault lines that are created, that are deeepend by a colonizer that fracture a society beyond reconciliation. Take a look at Rwanda. The Hutu and Tutsi have a long history of cohabilitation. Neither killed one another en mass. A colonizer rules for 100 years and voila we have genocide. Japanese society was never subject to that type of infighting.

Before the first White Man stepped into Africa, Africans had practiced slavery and were use to capturing enemy prisoners, and cannibalize them.

I really doubt that everything that occurred on that continent was kumbaya, peace and love. And why? I don't remember Africa creating the United Nations? Or being involved in diplomacy. Or even having the ability to write treaties. These inventions, came from the West, which require a high iq population to generate.

The history of Japan was also full of civil wars. You can read about the Meiji Restoration and the fact there were also foreign nations who got involved and backed rival sides. But even after such meddling, with the next 20 or so years, the Japanese still managed to industrialize quickly, and even beat a very notorious Western power in war (i.e the Russian Empire).

Japanese society was never subject to that type of infighting. Hence society as a whole could come together to address problems it’s leader saw fit. If instead of forcing the Emoperror to being God, if Americans had created their own emperor equivalent for Japan then maybe you would see the harm. This is what American seems to have done in Iraq after removing Saddam (intentionally or accidentally)

If the people really hate being ruled by puppets, they can overthrow them. That was literally how America was founded. "No taxation without representation" was a reference to no Americans being in British parliament, yet they still paid taxes to an overseas country. The U.S went to war, they won, and Britain recognized their existence.

If the Brown nations refuse to do the same or they fail at it, the fault once again lies within themselves. Every problem they brought up, White nations endured the same thing but still found a way to survive.

Spain & Portugal were once invaded and occupied by a Muslim Empire for hundreds of years. They hated this "oppression" and so one day, the Iberians overthrew the Muslims. With Spain & Portugal now liberated, they immediately began exploring the world, and setting up trading posts on different continents. This made them rich, and the money was reinvested to build more powerful armies and navies which helped them conquer every new territory they came across.

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I’m not saying everything was peaceful before or that colonizers are the source of everything evil.

But certain social identities of hierarchy were imposed by colonizers. This made their rule a common ally to warring factions. And to that extent, the colonizer is responsible.

In history, Britain is one country that understood the concept of “divide to rule”. I think it’s because if it’s geography and it’s relation to Europe. A united Europe would destroy Britain in no time but as long as there are European divisions, British success is guaranteed.

Its easy to say stuff like “if people don’t like x they can overthrow them”. It’s not that easy in practice. Like I can also say things like “if you don’t democrats and republicans, just overthrow them” but it’s far more difficult to even do something much smaller.

And what you said of Japan proves my point. It was only after the society stopped infighting and started to modernize that it resulted in a stronger nation. If this modernization was overseen by even a Korean colonizer, I doubt it would not create the societal fractures that would create separate nations.

And a lot of Africans countries like Ghana, Ethiopia, had contacts with many Indian rulers. Some African queen seems to have written treaties with pre-Caesar Rome too https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanirenas

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I’m not saying everything was peaceful before or that colonizers are the source of everything evil. But certain social identities of hierarchy were imposed by colonizers. This made their rule a common ally to warring factions. And to that extent, the colonizer is responsible.

The Africans made it a choice to practice those hierarchies now that the colonizers are gone. If they can't figure that out, then it means they're a lost cause.

In history, Britain is one country that understood the concept of “divide to rule”. I think it’s because if it’s geography and it’s relation to Europe. A united Europe would destroy Britain in no time but as long as there are European divisions, British success is guaranteed.

Britain by itself is a still a powerful country. It's not like they haven't fought against a united Europe before (i.e Napoleon or even Hitler).

Regardless, the comparison only proves the enormous differences that exist between the Western world and the non-white one. British people never blamed their failings on what Europe looked like. They played geopolitics well and looked after their own country.

Its easy to say stuff like “if people don’t like x they can overthrow them”. It’s not that easy in practice. Like I can also say things like “if you don’t democrats and republicans, just overthrow them” but it’s far more difficult to even do something much smaller.

The reason Democrats & Republicans have not been immediately ousted is because life in America is still somewhat good. It's not like half the country is starving or dropping dead in the streets. But make a population angry enough and they will demand a new government.

Look at Germany back in the 1920s and 1930s. That's a real example of Europeans suffering from hyperinflation or being unable to buy bread. Yet how did the Germans react? They voted in Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party to fix this, and they did.

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And who did Hitler fight ? Brown people ? Not sure if he is a good example either.

I feel I can see what the future of the west and it looks bleak to me. Part of the problem is the assumption of inherent superiority that people seem to have.

I’ll have to leave the discussion here. I tried to make my points but guess have not succeeded. I wish the west well despite the social fractures it now has developed.

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And this is exactly what the left did to America as well. Using race, sexuality and religion

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

using race and religion

Check out this guy called Yuri Bezmenov

[–]Agni777 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And a lot of Asian kids are offering to stepping down but for BLM and not for white people. It’s strange but I think it’s the effect of liberal brain washing and elite virtue show boating