you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why don't British men protect them?

I guess you would have to ask the British. It's not exactly a problem confined to the British isles either. Seems it's widespread in Europe, America and Australia.

It should be noted as well that fathers were arrested for confronting the groomers of their daughters in Britain. The entire system is against any time of White self-assertion so let's not pretend this is just a problem of cucked or effeminate men not protecting women.

Why do the Han Chinsese leadership put Turkic Muslims in concentration camps when they committ atrocities against the Han? Because their men are more masculine than the British? No. It's simply because their system values the health of their majority ethnic group and wants to protect it.

Focusing on the individual qualities of men or women seems to be missing the point for me. We need to take over the structures of power. Then you can decide the nature of the society around you. Individual men however chad or effiminate they are can't go around changing the nature of the Nation they live in.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Focusing on the individual qualities of men or women seems to be missing the point for me.

Yes, it's racist libtardism. Same as the ethnic mysticism people like to do where they will say dumb shit like X white ethnicity is naturally individualistic, or believe in 'pathological altruism' or 'anglos are greedy', hard men create good times cycle etc. It's all just nonsense substituting politics for a weird hobbyist belief system.