you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Kristina Pimenova

eww I thought cunnyfags were only on /tv/

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Kristina Pimenova

16 is not 'cunny'. There's nothing wrong with calling a teenager beautiful. We shouldn't over sexualize teens either but again saying a teen girl is beautiful or has good 'attractive' genetics is not 'cunny posting'. She's also a model so her and her family are putting the pictures into the public. It's not like the pictures are taken in some type of sneaky or stalking way. *

If /u/casparvoneverec had made this thread in 2018 or earlier you'd have a point.

OP is also not posting any picture just names of 'current' beautiful women.

*edit. Looks like as I research this girl her mother has had her modeling since 5 years old. I don't really support that but again she's 16 now and my point still stands that saying a 16 year old model is beautiful and not posting any pictures of her is not 'cunny'.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

the beatles had a song where they sing "she was just 17, you know what I mean"

deep down every man knows what they mean. Teen girls are hot. But we can use it as blackmail politically if they're one day under 18.