all 21 comments

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Imagine being the family of the victim listening to this. Your sister/mother/daughter is brutally murdered and you can't get fucking justice because a bunch of disgusting nogs won't convict one of their own.

Also why couldn't in the follow up trial the prosecution go for a change of venue or openly seek to exclude Blacks during jury selection?

Even in the Jussie Smollet case the one Black on the jury was talking afterwards about how reluctant he was to convict a 'young black man'.

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The foreman wouldn't read the manslaughter verdict because she felt the family wasn't getting justice.

Some apparently feel that monsters who brutally stab a tied-up woman whose house they broke into to steal shit and then plots with eight others for a jailbreak should walk free someday.

[–]Erasmus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Asian "ladies"? That's funny.

The judge was correct to declare a mistrial. Those three fucks should have been satisfied that the black was getting a manslaughter conviction even considering that thing tried to escape the courthouse. These idiots should have considered themselves lucky that he was only getting 30 years. He didn't show any respect to the court and neither did these three jurors.

Hopefully there's a silver lining to this and this literal bugman and his family get justice.

Edit: As it turns out the woman killed was white. Also, I thought the foreman was was one of the three jurors that led to the mistrial. She is not.

[–]Nasser 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Who's side are you on exactly in this?

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm on the side that doesn't tolerate animals murdering people in their homes.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

based

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

That's funny.

Why?

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I was going to comment that this post against negrolatry had a taste of yellow fever, but that's before I found out that they were actually a racemixing couple.

Not to mention, this case gets more ridiculous the more I look at it.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yellow fever?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

As it turns out the woman killed was white.

Source?

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I stand corrected.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Get alternates next time and use them.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can't just replace jurors when you get a verdict you don't like. Alternates are for emergencies, violations -- one of the Rittenhouse jurors for instance was replaced because they made a tasteless joke -- and other reasons.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Huh?

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Alternate jurors. So something like this is less likely to happen.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

you wouldn't use alternate jurors solely for the reason that the current jurors disagreed on the verdict, having a mistrial in the case that the entire jury isn't unanimous is appropriate.

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You're right. I was thinking along the lines of replacing the jurors before deliberation.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you'd probably need some sort of good reason for that like if the juror heard some piece of info that was actually inadmissible as evidence

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's white supremacy sweetie. Educate yourself.