To a fair first approximation, all crime in the U.S.A. is committed by blacks.

submitted by Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist from unz.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

clickbait. no need for that. Always just state facts.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Jesus, that IS a fact. There's frequently a lot of value in distilling a problem down to it's simplest form. e.g. If you were given ONE policy change to solve crime, what would it be? Our (((enemies))) would say remove Whites. But they'd be 180 degrees wrong. If you asked them what is the total solution they give Byzantine solutions involving White guilt, prison reform (free the Blacks), 1619 project indoctrination, Affirmative Action, No Child Left Behind, miscegenation, Hate Speech laws, ...ad nausea. But the truth is, and we can go back in time to prove our one policy change is all that's needed, just remove Blacks from White society and crime goes away, TO A FIRST ORDER APPROXIMATION.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

"all crime in the U.S.A. is committed by blacks." a lie that makes you look like a clown, clickbait to get people to click. Never do that, it's a sign you don't really believe your own thoughts, just trying to get clicks.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

"all crime in the U.S.A. is committed by blacks."

I never said that. Nice straw man though.

I suppose this argument is for the more numerically minded, or at least those that can parse a sentence.

Would you say it was "a lie" if 1 million Blacks committed murder and 1 White that I said "essentially all murders are committed by Blacks"? Would you delete "essentially", misquote me, and then call me a liar?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

dummy look at the title of this thread

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Idiot, you half quoted the title, completely changing the meaning. I have a suggestion, continue with manual labor and leave the thinking and wordplay to others.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

the title is the title kid next time read before copying and pasting

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Look, I know this is complicated but:

"To a fair first approximation, all crime in the U.S.A. is committed by blacks."

is NOT the same as

"All crime in the U.S.A. is committed by blacks."

So when you say "is", you realize that means "the same as", or "equals". But "To a fair first approximation" does not mean "equals", it means ...

Oh never mind, you're as dumb as a rock and will never understand.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

either it's all or not all, approximation has nothing to do it, I am just going by the title which I won't click on if they're going to use clickbait