I found it an inspiring video. Instead of commenting on the timestamps as I initially intended, I ended up writing much more.

Zemmour begins by addressing what is in all but name anomie. Anomie denotes certain strange, negative feelings that all of us here have probably felt. It involves feeling unsynchronized with one's milieu, of feeling that one would be better off in a different time or place.

For us, in our time and place, it is the homelessness that one feels when the stranger has his own home, but is also a squatter wrongly considered a 'co-owner' of your own. You do not even want him there, and yet the stranger is changing your home against your will, perhaps even irreversibly; furthermore, you know that he increasingly threatens you within it. As he grows in numbers, in authority, in power, you also know that your home will eventually become his and that you will then be homeless. He will have two homes and you will have none. You want these problems to end in a new social order so that you will feel synchronized again. But nobody will even mention it, nobody will even listen. One may reason that they must all be blind, deaf and dumb. And yet there are many that do see it, but yet they support it. You feel you have no choice but to despair.

It matters not where you go: hospital, school, street, train; nothing is truly yours. It is you who is the foreigner, the alien; when you walk outside and look at the faces of the new 'co-owners' whom you yourself never invited, when you turn on the radio or television and hear their foreign accents and languages. If they were to speak ill of you in their foreign tongues, you would not even know it. They can hate you openly, and yet you cannot do anything to them.

Advertisements, movies, posters, television programs... we are exceedingly nowhere to be found within all of them. It is, or was, our home... but it is inhabited by, and run for, others.

1:00 - You remember the places in which you grew up; the places your ancestors told you about; the places you see in old photographs; and read of in old books. Which of them is not changing for the worse, you ask? Only for others to smugly tell you that you view the past through rose-tinted lenses, that it was somehow worse than this dystopia. Could it not be that, for them, dystopia is their utopia, just as wickedness is their righteousness? That it is the product of their contempt for, and ignorance of, the past, and of their replacement of historical truth with historical revisionism?

To confirm our suspicions, Zemmour reminds us all of the things France has lost. There is no modern Descartes nor Pasteur, not even a Voltaire nor Rousseau. What great man who is French lives today?

2:27 - Here, Zemmour speaks as though he reads our minds. He also knows that we feel anomie. The 121,000 who have liked the original video in the last 20 hours feel it, too. He hints at our self-censoriousness, and at censoriousness more generally. Many do not say what they think because they are socialized to believe that such thoughts are wrong; and even of those who break free from this conditioning, practically all will still not say what they think because of the reactions they anticipate from the many who have not.

Because Zemmour is a Jew, he can safer say aloud that which we think. A man of obvious immigrant descent saying these things makes them seem less taboo.

3:10 - The unelected bureaucrats in Brussels; the talking heads in France's media; the quackademics in French universities. They are merely some of those who are complicit.

I do get the impression from this speech that he's 'too good to be true'. The vision that he offers us is one that we cannot even offer ourselves because we cannot say even a tenth of what he has said in public. He thus seems like he is playing the role of a saviour who has arrived at a perfect time to save a nation and people who cannot save themselves. He even sounds like he's emulating our language: at 8:23, he even uses the words, "We will not be replaced". Does he hint at... The Great Replacement? Is it... a 'racist dogwhistle'?

I think Zemmour himself is legit. He's been in this too long and fell afoul of the law too many times to be someone who is uncommitted. He has distributed many red pills and awoken many people, for which he should be thanked. The problem is whether someone is using him merely to divide the vote, or to reduce 'Right-wing anti-Semitism' by empowering one of the very few seemingly good ones so that they can then say: 'See, we're not always subversive!'. Either way, France is so far down the toilet that it is difficult to envisage Zemmour worsening things more than his rivals. Macron is the evil we know; Melenchon is the evil we can safely predict; Zemmour is something of a wild card. So what does France have left to lose? The Zemmour train cannot be much worse than the Trump train, for Trump was practically controlled by Kushner and others of Zemmour's kind, anyway. Americans elected one goy surrounded by Jews; so who can blame the French if they elect one Jew surrounded by goys? Those who board the Zemmour train cannot be worse than the Americans who boarded the Adelson, Kushner, etc. 'Trump' train.