Swedish scientists prosecuted for finding that most rapes are committed by immigrants

submitted by Fourth_stage from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

They also imported these people to undermine and destroy Sweden's homogeneity

So there are people in Sweden who get up each morning, thinking?: today I want to help destroy Sweden's homogeneity....

(Nope, that's obviously not a motivation for 99% of any group. Follow the money.)

The European - meaning white - immigrants, yes.

Nope - that's of course a ridiculous racist idea. Don't be ridiculous, or evil. All working immigrants contribute to an economy.

send the ones who are already there back.

This promotes a humanitarian crisis.

Think of real-world solutions, Ethnocrat, rather than this brainwashed, schizo, unfounded hatred. Follow the money, and address that problem.

[–]Foidblaster9000 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (15 children)

Contrary to your extremely narrow minded belief, people have the capacity to be terrible without being included in the 1%. If you're taking more in benefits than you put out, your presence is a net loss and a burden. If someone make demands to cater to their beliefs or culture when entering nations foreign to them, especially when most of those cultural norms are damaging to others or centric to their people instead of expecting basic respect, they're a burden. Humanitarian crisis in most of these instances are manufactured, not really the need, but who is helped. Real world solutions are leaving them alone to fuck up their own nations

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

You'd have to be much more specific. Generalizations like this are uninformative. Consider the motivations, what is to gain, the history, and the rest of it. Don't jsut assume that the people you don't agree with can be insulted with generalities like this. It doesn't work.

[–]Foidblaster9000 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

What do I need to be more specific about? There's nothing to gain by any country taking in people that do more harm than good to not only the culture there, but the people and the economy.

You're making a mistake that I'm assuming anything. I observed and gave a critical opinion on what I see of your views. If you're going to consider that a personal insult or attack, you should consider discussing topics of this nature with people that exclusively share your opinions and won't criticize you.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

What do you think the operator of the socks account believes it's accomplishing here?

And do you think it posts from one of the bases around Haifa, or around Tel Aviv?

It's interesting that they've assigned it to saidit, rather than one of the larger platforms.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I suspect the u/socks account is similar to salos/ayatollahs/republican58, i.e. mentally ill, lonely, obssessed and addicted to internet trolling and catfishing. This is his only hobby. He may have little or no family connections and few friends to spend time with. What little joy he gets from life comes from the time he spends on the internet. There is no end game for him other than creating more pointless conversation. Like salos, he lives in a fantasy world, pretending to be the person he wants to impresss the most, his own mother, who wants nothing to do with him. He hits that submit button like a nigger hits his crack pipe.

These trolls aren't paid shills. They're just addicts.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Rather insecure of you and /u/Node to resort to an ad hominem attacks. If you've both got a worthwhile comment about a subject, make it, otherwise you should simply recognize that you don't have anything reasonable to contribute to that particular discussion. It's as simple as that. Have some self-respect.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Rather insecure of you and /u/Node

I'm amazed at how insecure I am. Really blows my mind sometimes.

But thanks for that ping. The occasional bon mots by the socks account can be pretty funny, and you've brightened my day! It's 70f and the sun is shining on the left coast, so what more could I ask for?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Best wishes, Node

[–]Foidblaster9000 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know what to make of it. If anything it just polarizes people further away from the opinions shared.

Quick question. I've had this second turkey breast thawing from frozen solid since Thursday morning. Do you think fixing it now will result in death or extreme and violent diarrhea?

[–]Node 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thawing at room temp for 3 days = death.

Thawing in the fridge should be fine. Give it the smell test first though. I tend to go well beyond those ultra conservative guidelines for meat, unless I happen to leave it out overnight at room temp.

Have you brined poultry? If so, how did that turn out?

I'd be mildly interested in seeing someone else's analysis of the socks account. The operator is clearly not as retarded or clueless as the account pretends to be. Its use of disingenuous rhetorical techniques points directly towards some type of forum disruption, if you've ever read that on the cryptome site.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Node - contribute to a discussion or don't contribute. Who people are doesn't matter. OK? Don't be so insecure. Others also likely disagree with you, BTW. It's probably more comment than you may think. Regarding larger platforms, I am also on Reddit.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Others also likely disagree with you, BTW.

People who disagree with me have a 96% chance of being wrong, given the realities of the bell curve.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

LOL

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There's nothing to gain by any country taking in people that do more harm than good to not only the culture there, but the people and the economy.

It generally doesn't happen (because most people aren't assholes).

If you really want to understand what's happening: look at the big picture. The 'haves' have always exploited the 'have nots'. Wake up and smell the economy.

[–]Foidblaster9000 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

No fucking shit. But that's not just the 1%. That's several people under the guise that this system benefits their shitty businesses in some way, meanwhile they're still getting the table scraps compared to multi-national business entities. It's a system that attempts to convince those businesses that cheap labor is great, and they can make tons of profit, meanwhile the communities suffer because not all of those people work and many are just going to take advantage of systems in place and damage the structural integrity of the economic systems put in place with the smaller native population in mind. That's not even accounting for the crimes and cultural destruction that happen as a result. It's a hierarchy of greed with a mask of altruism and tolerance that exploits the host country and attempts to violate the human rights of immigrants by using them as a source. That doesn't mean that it's right, and that people of these host countries should accept it.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We actually agree on this.

One of the few so-called right-wing/non-centrist issues I agree with is a stricter immigration policy and better boarder security, because the lack of these can lead to increased crime rates (but this is not a comment on race or ethnicity). Much of the right-wing 1% want to get votes by speaking against immigration, but instead support it, because their corporate and farming doners want them to support immigration, and especially allow for illegal immigration, which is cheaper labour, on a seasonal basis. Neo-Liberals support immigration without lying about their support. I don't support liberal policies on immigration, not in the least. My main arguments at DAR tend to be against racist comments and unfounded claims.