A possible theory about how the left has been able to dominate cultural, social and academic sectors

submitted by Nasser from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The revolutionaries of last century were well aware students and the military were the core of revolution. The people in power took note of this and made the military and universities require total loyalty to liberalism to hold any kind of influence.

It didn't help that in the second half of the 20th century there really was no need for efficient or independent institutions of learning or war. American material superiority in Korea, Vietnam, etc. was so massive that the real bottleneck was political division. These institutions became a battleground for influence and consequently there was a much greater incentive to socially engineer them rather than to let them perform their functions organically.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Bane voice: Peace has cost us our strength, victory has defeated us!

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Best line in the film.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That and the scene when he goes in the stock exchange and the guy says something like 'there's nothing to steal' and he replies 'then why are you people here?', based.

Bane really was based in rhetoric. Shame he had to be underhanded building the myth that populist and revolutionary rhetoric must necessarily be cynical demagoguery serving some nefarious end.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Shame he had to be underhanded building the myth that populist and revolutionary rhetoric must necessarily be cynical demagoguery serving some nefarious end.

True but at least his cynical form of popular revolt complete with lumpenprole and literal criminals released from prison resembles much more closely a left-anarchist brand of revolution which saves that part for me.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol thinking about it he's like fash in rhetoric but Maoist in praxis, he's something like Franco Freda.