all 38 comments

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It may be a flawed way of looking at things but for me I've always thought that just about every single European country outside of a few exceptions has a football team that, without any other context, you probably wouldn't be able to guess the exact origins of-- this is obviously true only of the European descended people and doesn't include all the Africans who are now in many European teams. There's so much overlap in the European phenotype.

I'd say Harry Kane is peak British Isles phenotype and a guy like Rabiot is ultimate Gaul phenotype but would either of them look out of place in the English or French team? I dare anyone who doesn't know anything about football to try and test themselves to just look at a team picture of the Russian national team and say the Welsh one and genuinely be able to tell the difference. I can't. Try doing the same with the Romanian team and the Italian one.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

the farther away from the mediterranean and hence africa the more nordic people look, aka red hair and blonde hair.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Slavs usually look more gracile, baby-faced?

    The way I see it, Slavic men fall into one of two phenotypes:

    a) Fat, pudgy faces.

    b) Square, killer-like faces. I swear half the Russian men look like they'd beat you to death for glancing at their sister.

    Bronze age pervert is probably the only handsome Russian man who doesn't look like a killer. He has a friendly face.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

    That is true. Slavic women are some of the most beautiful women on the planet, but the men...not so much. It's obviously clear why many Slavic women prefer Western white men.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    It's obviously clear why many Slavic women prefer Western white men.

    For money and green cards. They marry chumps from America and Britain and once they have citizenship, divorce their asses and take their money.

    Slavic men have very masculine faces and are more violent and rowdy. Chicks are sexually attracted to that.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    That is such bullshit.

    [–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    b) Square, killer-like faces.

    Are you referring to the Kaczynski-looking types?

    [–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    There are distinct visual differences between ethnicities that sorta give away a person heritage (sometimes, at least). They're very hard to describe accurately but I think your descriptions hold. I can often estimate someone's ancestry but I've never put it to the test really. Sometimes it's VERY obvious (Hmm, I wonder where that redhead with the freckles and paper-white skin is from, what a stumper!) whereas others not so much. It's also easier among better-looking people, for whatever reason.

    I would say Saxons/Germans/Norse people have somewhat more square, severe features, Anglos/Anglo-Saxons have a more rounded/oval element to them (this goes doubly so for Irish/Scots). I can think of many others but they are difficult to describe in a manner linguistically distinct from my descriptions of the others.

    Body type is also something of a tell, with Germans obviously tending to be taller and Meds being shorter and stockier. Body type varies greatly with genetics, nutrition, and health though obviously so it's not always a good predictor.

    Being an Amerimutt also complicates matters as there's a sort of phenotype associated with Amerimutts too, which is sort of a mix of multiple European types/somewhat generic as one might expect.

    [–]Sapphire 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    How mixed are White Americans outside of the major coastal states/cities?

    It seems (to me, as someone not from the US) that there's an obvious Germanic/Nordic look in many white Americans from states like the Dakotas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Tennessee etc.

    I was in TN and remember seeing a lot of white mothers with blond(e)-haired kids somewhere outside of Nashville.

    My understanding of US immigration history (between the 1840s - 1920s or thereabouts) is that the Irish, Italians, Polish, Jews, etc tended to congregate in ethnic neighbourhoods in NYC, NJ, Philly and Chicago, whereas immigrants from Scandinavia and Germany were more inclined to move out West and spread out. I know there were cohesive German communities, where German was spoken etc, but WW1 sort of killed that off.

    I used to be under the impression that it was trendy in the US to be of Irish or Italian stock, but apparently that's mainly just a NYC/NJ/Boston thing that's been overemphasized in popular culture due to things like The Sopranos, Jersey Shore, and so on. At least according to /r/AskAnAmerican on Reddit.

    [–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I live in the Midwest (Ohio specifically) and a lot of the Whites I've seen are quite obviously mostly/completely White. Whites of Germanic descent, made obvious by surname and/or phenotype, are very common and the rest I'd say are probably Anglo or of indeterminable White admixture.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

    The French and the English are actually very similar. They're both a mixture between Celtic and Germanic peoples. The difference however is that Great Britain - because it's an island - probably has experienced more inbreeding than France. The average Frenchman is definitely better looking than the average Englishman. Another difference is that during the 19th century France has had a major migrant influx from Italy and Spain, but they've completely assimilated. They're now as French as you can possibly be, which is obviously an impossibility for Arabs or negroes.

    Germans on the other hand also have significant Slavic ancestry. They're not entirely Germanic. They never were actually. They've always had Celtic roots as well.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

    The average Frenchman is definitely better looking than the average Englishman

    That might be true for the women but the men?

    England produces some of the most handsome men in the world: Henry Cavil, Sam Claflin, Robert Pattinson, and Pierce Brosnan to name a few. I can't recall a single French man that has anywhere near that level of craze or handsomeness.

    [–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

    England produces some of the most handsome men in the world: Henry Cavil, Sam Claflin, Robert Pattinson, and Pierce Brosnan to name a few.

    There are just as many famous beautiful actresses and models from Britain. The "British women are ugly" is a stupid stereotype and you know it based on nothing considering Australia is often associated with hot women despite being almost all descendants from the British Isles.

    Britain does seem to have an usually amount of very ugly people compare to other nations but at the same time have just as many attractive people as most other European nations.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

    British women are ugly

    Three-word rebuttal: Rosie Huntington Whitley. Instant cure for any suffering from erectile dysfunction.

    [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

    I wondered why she looked so Eastern European. Her grandma's jewish.

    [–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    What Eastern European ethnicity are you thinking of that resembles Jews in appearance?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Admixture makes for little distinctions, such as the way that her eyes are set in her skull, and maybe I'm wrong about that but patterns, etc. She looks some flavor of slavic to me with the shape of her jawline and eyes though, and nothing like her very English looking parents. Her grandmother is Polish-Jewish, so I guess that's where the features come through, then I assume admixture softens everything out more.

    [–]grassfed 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    And probably cornfed too

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Do Brits eat a shit ton of corn?

    [–]grassfed 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Its cheap so I think so

    [–]Imperium 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Nothing compared to Zienna Sonne Williams. The hottest woman on earth.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    That figure cannot be real. I got an immediate erection.

    Is she pagan?

    [–]Imperium 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Disgusting

    [–]Imperium 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    For a nigger he is very good looking

    [–]Sapphire 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Just an observation: British women from middle-class backgrounds are often quite beautiful and feminine, but the working-class ones tend to be rough looking. It doesn't help that obesity is pretty prolific among working-class Brits.

    Go to popular holiday resorts in Spain during the summer, you will see a lot of genetic trash from the UK (to be brutally honest), male and female alike. If you didn't believe in physiognomy, you'll definitely believe in it after.

    Keep in mind that class in the UK is different to the US, it's not just an economic construct, but largely based on heritage.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Germans on the other hand also have significant Slavic ancestry. They're not entirely Germanic. They never were actually.

    AFAIK, most Germans descend from the ancient Germanic tribes that fought with Rome. East Germans have Slavic ancestry because that region was the last to be conquered by the HRE in the 11th century. The sorbs and Pomeranians used to live in the land we know as East Germany.

    The rest of Germany never had any Slavic settlement. Perhaps some Poles settled in the Ruhr in the 19th century to mine coal.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    ancient Germanic tribes

    Who already had significant Celtic ancestry. Also, why go back all the way to ancient Rome? What about the last 1000 years?

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    How far back do genetics still have an effect on phenotype? If it's back as far as ancient Rome, wouldn't that make sense?

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Who already had significant Celtic ancestry

    Celts aren't really a difference sub race. Celts and Germans are both northwest European and had similar pale skin and light eyes and hair.

    Ironically, the Romans which Nietzscheans worship sported and still sport a more middle eastern look. And the Romans genocided the gauls.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Romans which Nietzscheans worship sported and still sport a more middle eastern look.

    Not really.

    [–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Not at all, actually, so long as we are talking about the founding stock of the city of Rome.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    England produces some of the most handsome men in the world: Henry Cavil, Sam Claflin, Robert Pattinson, and Pierce Brosnan to name a few.

    cough cough

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    cough cough

    Inshallah, by the grace of Allah, you too shall be as fair as Oberst Joachim Piper

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I said average. You just mentioned outliers. Yes, Britain has some very beautiful people, but also tons of ugly ones.

    As far as an example of a handsome Frenchman is concerned, Julien Rochedy comes to mind.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    we might be less exposed to french actors, handsome or ugly, because of the language barrier, british actors have an easier time getting known by americans.

    [–]grassfed 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    u/jet199 would probably disagree