you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

This one's more of a novel, really.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Another based take is that the comic predicts Feminism is a weapon to destroy traditional families.

Predictions usually don't come half a century after an event occurred lol. This is like saying a 1960s comic predicted the outbreak of WWI by displaying Franz Ferdinand getting killed.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Prior to the Civil Rights Act, America was still a patriarchal society that allowed you to discriminate on race or gender. Men unanimously ran the government and several businesses. Seeing women trying to take over these institutions, especially after the new cultural norms told them to stop being homemakers, would have been a shock.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Prohibition as an example was in 1920-1933, this is when jews used feminists to ban alcohol so they could take over the industry whilst the goys went out of business.

Feminism was being used by jews to destroy white society from the start.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

As far as I know, prohibition was an organic movement that came out of rural protestants. They were put off by the decadence of the cities and wanted to impose more moral restraint. The urban Catholics got butthurt over this.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't trust anything in America that comes from protestants and benefits jews. That describes almost every gayop in America.

Even if by some miracle there wasn't plans beforehand it still had the same end consequence as if it was. The law had exceptions for sacramental wine for rabbis which tripled in volume in the first year. At the end of prohibition jews had conquered the whole liquor industry, might have been organic or gayop; either way it benefitted jewry.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Research shows Jews got away with it, but other religious groups did so too because of a loophole. In fact, Churches were seen as high valued targets because they were allowed to store wine.

https://vinepair.com/articles/how-the-church-saved-the-wine-industry-during-prohibition/

But the religious exception not only made priests into bootleggers. It also made churches targets for thieves, or people just thirsty for a glass of wine. The owner of a New York wholesaler must have been frustrated but not completely surprised when, in late December of 1919, he found that nine barrels of wine had been siphoned via a 75-foot pipe from his basement to another person’s seller. “The owner had a special permit from the government to keep the wine in bond, with the understanding that it was to be sold for religious purposes only,” the Associated Press reported at the time. That permit was enough to keep the wholesaler safe from law enforcement, but not from the criminal element thirsty for a drink. In 1920 in Washington, D.C., the Associated Press reported on another such theft. “Church Wine Lures Him From Prayers,” ran the headline. “Rev. J. Henning Nelms of the Church of the Ascension, noted the devout appearance of a stranger, kneeling alone in the church,” the writer notes. “Some time later the stranger had gone and with him six quarts of communion wine from the church cup-board.”

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not in favor of prohibition but you could make a good case that it was a successful public health policy. Liver disease reduced significantly under prohibition.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's not the problem with it, the problem is it was just a jewish economic and power strategy.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I actually didn't know that. Are there any links you can send me on that?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My evidence is circumstantial like jew wine being an exception to the ban and jews taking over the whole industry during the period. I've not read a book on it or anything but it stinks of the usual jew stuff, and even if it wasn't a gayop from the outset they used it and effectively guided it in at least a few areas to get the same outcome.