all 50 comments

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How are they going to frame them as dumb conservatives?

[–]jamesK_3rd 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't. You cover it up and keep it quiet. They won't acknowledge it, and the MSM won't broadcast it.

The masses must take the jab.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

neolibs are just centerists like on reddit. Very low IQ.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

High IQ autists could get much higher IQs if they got rid of the toxic metals that are making them autistic in the first place. Not directly related to other high IQ people refusing the vaccines, but suffice it to be understood that they put neurotoxins in ALL vaccines.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

The higher rate of autism is caused by children increasingly being born to older fathers. Older sperm have more genetic mutations. It's a well-observed fact that older fathers produce more autistic children.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Here's a study exploring parental age and autism. There's evidently a higher risk (at least according to this particular study) noted in older parents in general, and also with age gaps.

https://www.nature.com/articles/mp201570

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Oh yes, there is a correlation. There are many things that have correlation.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Well, yeah. I'm pretty sure the longer we're exposed to the dogshit in our environments, the more damaged our sperm/egg quality becomes. The further that gets bred into following generations, the worse the starting quality begins from even in utero, pretty much damning us into having more/higher risks each generation.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I want to see the studies that show no relationship between infants and children and their vaccinations. I'll just wait here.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You could probably find some data, but it's possibly buried. If you know what the specific ingredients are, you can go through testing data that way and try to pluck information from bits and pieces of different studies to draw correlations.

I think that I've missed something here too. You guys were in a pissing contest about what causes what, and I only saw his comment on s/all and replied there out of interest in adding to it specifically. I hadn't read the rest of the comment string. Anyhow, it's likely a touch of all of it. I know that many microorganisms respond well towards adequate iron within the body, but I'll have to dig around to find more info. You can't follow my thought stream on this, and I'm sorry about that, but there's a point I'll try to get back to you with.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I've studied enough biology to understand that there is no place for most of the "special sauce" of these so-called "vaccines" in something that supposedly should enhance your health.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I was thinking that there was going to be something far bigger to it. Viruses use transition metals to replicate and do other bullshit with, and if there was a way to fuck that process up for them by binding ionzed metals with something that was viralcidal, it would mess up their little capsids and keep them from replicating properly. Sort of like how you can ruin the cell walls of some bacteria by screwing up their ability to maintain the peptidoglycan. Anyhow, we're technically supposed to find ways to safely do all of this in ways that don't disturb human homeostasis, but I'm sure that safety and damns given are heartily tossed out the window by the companies that make these pharmaceuticals.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And you know this. LOL.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I do think that metals in vaccines are a problem. I've read some studies though that lead me to believe autism is coming from older sperm and egg. Whites being more disproportionately affected as a result.

[–]Yin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. Aluminum and other nanoparticle toxins small enough to enter the brain is no laughing matter.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Go back to InfoWars.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If toxic metals and/or vaccines were the cause of autism, you wouldn't expect it to just affect a tiny fraction of the population. Maybe toxic metals and/or vaccines exacerbate the effects autism and other mental illnesses in people already prone to it, but the primary cause of autism is much more likely to be genetic.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

BiG pHaRmA dOeSn'T kNoW hOw To DoSe ThInGs...

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you know what an LD50 is? It's a dose of something that is lethal in precisely 50% of cases. Every substance has an LD50. The generalized conclusion that can be drawn from this fact is that something may cause an effect (death in this example) only in a fraction of a population (50% in this case).

The alternating caps is sarcasm. So writing: "BiG pHaRmA dOeSn'T kNoW hOw To DoSe ThInGs" means that Big Pharma has scientists, money, time, facilities, EVERYTHING needed to ensure that they dose the neurotoxins they feed the sheeple (or inject them with, in the case of vaxx) in such a way as to trigger severe reactions such as autism only in a small number of people. This way they can claim no relationship and retain the appearance of truthfulness.

And the sheeple buy it.

Let me give you another example: During COVID Lockdown, Vaccine Rates Dropped — So Did the Number of SIDS Deaths. The title shows a fact, but of course Big Pharma and their shills are going to say otherwise, and twist the data around to say that there is no relationship.

WHY THEN are there KNOWN AND PROVEN NEUROTOXINS in their "medications"? You mean to tell me that they are known and proven neurotoxin unless it's Big Pharma that injects you with them? Science doesn't work like that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (12 children)

They should outlaw nuclear power anyway, a meltdown is inevitable.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Utter bullshit. Nuclear fission plants are one of the safest and most efficient power sources that exists. Next Gen Thorium plants also are extremely promising. 1/10th of the carbon output typically as coal and gas.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

carbon being so bad and climate change is fake anyway, so why use nuclear power, they always meltdown and they have waste that is toxic for thousands of years.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

They don't 'always melt down' they virtually never melt down. Again you're just talking shit. Safe, efficient and cheap no matter what you think about Carbon Dioxide.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

even melting down once is one too many. fukushima increased cancer on the west coast. No more of these, shut all the current ones down.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How many 'melt down' deaths have there been in France? Don't fucking look it up. You sound like you know all about the issue.

The vast majority of the French power supply is Nuclear and has been for decades. So tell me all about the profound danger to the country this allegedly dangerous form of power has posed.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The nuclear power plant in Fukushima had outdated reactors (which are a lot less safe than more recent nuclear reactors), and it was also built in an area prone to tsunamis. Also, the death rate by the Fukushima disaster pales in comparison to the death rate from the 2011 tsunami itself.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I agree that climate change is probably overexaggerated, but why take the risk if we have technology (nuclear energy) that's both more efficient and more carbon neutral anyways? If the sea levels start rising, this will flood low-lying coastal areas that are too poor, high time preference and/or low-IQ to build the infrastructure necessary to fend off the sea (i.e Bangladesh, Maldives, New Orleans), causing much more destruction than all nuclear disasters combined have ever caused.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Climate change isn't exaggerated. Climate has ALWAYS changed. It's the human role in it which is utterly insignificant, which is blown out of all proportion.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

burning coal or oil leads to waste, smoke in the air. nuclear energy is basically burning atoms, it leads to waste, which gives off radiation. Chernobyl, three mile island, Fukushima, these things all did happen so I don't think the risk of nuclear radiation is fake like climate change. With climate change, it will increase world temperature by 2 degrees celcius. That is actually fine. The water level won't rise more than a few inches, it won't be like the fictional movie Waterworld. Solar power and wind power makes more sense. The rich elites don't like that as much. It's free energy. With an oil field, or a coal mine, or a nuclear power plant, they can surround it with their guards and control it and slowly dispense energy for money. Can they surround a solar power plant or a wind power plant and control it, not really, it's easy for regular people and independent nations to make their own setups.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, the Los Alamos lab works on nuclear weapons, not reactors. So your "point" is moot.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nice try, Shell.

[–]Wrangel 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

If you can't even be bothered to take a vaccine to protect your colleagues, they are probably better off without you. I am rather amazed that somebody would give up a career over being terrified of a vaccine that billions of people have taken.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The vaccine doesn't prevent infection and spread the corona virus. Stop spreading bullshit about the vaccine.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nuclear scientists are smart enough to see it is unnecessary to take an experimental vaccine that doesn't even work.

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The CDC keeps records on the number of people who have died from adverse reactions to the vaccines. The CDC reported 12,313 deaths on their website, before they hastily edited that number down to 6079 deaths. That was back on July 19, so the true number must be even higher by now.

[–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

And that's only a fraction of the "vaccine"-caused deaths and horrible side effects that really occur but are never entered into that database. Incredibly worse long term side effects as this globalist scheme continues.

[–]TheJamesRocket 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, precisely. The CDC only records deaths that occur 2 weeks after vaccination. If deaths occur in less than 2 weeks, they are registered as 'unvaccinated.' It is a statistical sleight of hand that conceals the true body count. The true number could be much higher. And there are also those who are injured by the vaccines, but don't actually die.

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you can't be bothered to stop spreading globalist merchant fake hysteria propaganda that empowers traitors, everyone is better off without you.

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not like you can easily replace them.

[–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

only high IQ elites can lead it.

I disagree.

It doesn't take a charasmatic leader. The closest there was pushed the vaccine and promptly got defeated.

It doesn't take elites, unless Rand Paul is one, and not many people hang on his words: he's just a last-resort for sense.

Some capable people do what's right because it's right. That is the essence of salt of the earth.

If you'll forgive me the source of the analogy, this is how Atlas shrugs. Not with loud majorities and visible leaders but with quiet ideas and tacit knowledge.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Is this really the hill we want to die on?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

It's one of the hills. When you defend a city, you need to fortify a number of hills. Those hills are Race realism, patriarchy, heteronormitivity, counter-Semitism, bodily autonomy, a health first policy, distribution and rejection of capitalism, and rejection of totalitarian control over the individual and community.

The covid vaccines fall under bodily autonomy, health, and totalitarianism.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

distribution and rejection of capitalism

What do you mean by that exactly?

totalitarian control

So you're against fascism?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

distribution and rejection of capitalism

What do you mean by that exactly?

Capitalism is a system where the pursuit of profits and economic logic dominates society. It means that if profit motive dictates deindustrialization and mass immigration for cheap labor, that must be done. It means that if economic logic necessitates feminism, dislocation, alienation, overwork, and commercialization of vices, it must be done.

Capitalism also results in the formation of an oligarchy and the concentration of wealth into too few hands. The principle of distributism is that wealth should be dispersed as much as possible. We don't want a society where 1% owns all the wealth and all property is concentrated in the hands of a handful of corporations.

That's not desirable. Instead of four agriculture companies owning all the land, it's best if agriculture is done by millions of medium, small and medium-large farms. Instead of Walmart like supermarket chains, there should be hundreds of thousands of mom-and-pop shops.

In some sectors, there has to be concentration. Particularly heavy and technical sectors like the steel industry, automobiles, shipping, aerospace, and electronics. But even there, there should be multiple major competitions in competition with each other and no cross owning. Workers should have a say in the election of upper management and through protectionist policies, wages would be kept high.

No fractional reserve banking. No financialization of the economy. No equity firms, hedge funds, and venture capitalism. No stock market at all. The value of companies would be decided by a machine algorithm factoring in profits, scale, and productivity rather than gambling on the stock market.

Most banking would be down on the local level via credit union-like institutions. Large banks would be state-owned and leased out to private administrators. They'd provide credit to industry. Instead of new money being created via debt by private banks, it would be created by the government in the form of free housing loans to eugenic couples and infrastructure funding.

The basic theme is to dilute wealth into as many hands as possible and prevent a financial oligarchy from forming. Tolkien and many other thinkers in the late 19th and early 20th century favored such a system. Jefferson also believed in a strong yeomanry. A nation of many prosperous farmers, businessmen, and workers. In his eyes, western yeomanry was what separated the west from the eastern style despotism of Byzantium, Russia, and the Islamic world.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I agree with pretty much everything you said here, but it's still capitalism. There's still capital, private property, and profits. You just have a more state-controlled form of capitalism with far less parasitic elements. It's much closer to the fascist model than the neoliberal model, which is a good thing of course, but it's still capitalism.

The value of companies would be decided by a machine algorithm factoring in profits, scale, and productivity rather than gambling on the stock market.

This might actually be the most interesting thing you've ever said. It's a very Veblenite idea. Have I influenced your thinking on this by mentioning Project Cybersyn?

Tolkien and many other thinkers in the late 19th and early 20th century favored such a system.

You should look up C. H. Douglas and social credit.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This might actually be the most interesting thing you've ever said. It's a very Veblenite idea. Have I influenced your thinking on this by mentioning Project Cybersyn?

I can't say. I'll admit I haven't read schmitt or veblen. I haven't read any philosophy at all to be strictly honest, not even Plato or aristotle. I read a dozen pages in Nietzsche's Twilight of the idols and a few pages in Simon De Beavoir's second sex. That's the extent of my philosophical readings.

All my views and commentary are my own conclusions and ideas. I do read a lot of hard data though- history, articles on economics, military affairs, and so on.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm the other way around. Lol!

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There's still capital, private property, and profits

And the problem is...?

Private property is an essential component to a free society. To dignified living. It was an integral part of indo-european societies. In fact, its a natural and integral part of human society. The absence of wide scale ownership of private property is unnatural, as we see in communism, late Roman and increasingly in late stage western capitalism.

Profits and the free market are good things too. You need incentives to innovate and work hard. The market also spurs exchange of ideas and is more efficient. The Soviets had no profits or market and they were a basket case. Soviet peasants did some farming in their free time on their personal land and this ''hobby farming'' produced a fourth of the Soviet Empire's food.

Russia has since cast off communism and has allowed the profit motive and market again, albeit with restraints. Now its the largest wheat exporter in the world. From a land of famines to a land of bounty in 30 years.

Hitler himself greatly admired industrial entrepreneurship and private ownership of property and companies. He didn't nationalize Krupp, Diamler-Benz, IG Farben or any of the great German industrial firms. Mussolini had a more communistic view with a bend towards nationalization. And the Italian economy was extremely inefficient and unproductive during the war.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a problem because it's still based on the infinite growth paradigm.