Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (64 children)

ActuallyNot, image links have been mirrored for your convenience, because your globalist tyrannical scum "government" (Australia) censors/bans 4pleb and you're too scared to get a VPN and learn:

Zero should be interpreted as near zero. White on black rape has been extremely low for a long time. The reverse disparity has been getting worse. In other words, the following sampling ranging back to 1996 is now misleading, but even then it's still damning:

Now adjust for population sizes during those time periods. The black population is around 13%. The real figure depends on interpretation with mixed kids inheriting various related genes/traits influencing this subject at higher rates but I must digress for simplicity.

Picture this crime curve:

Except for interracial rape the curve is exponentially more up the hockey stick.

Black men rape a lot of white women. The reverse is rare. This isn't rocket science.

This is more for readers, not ActuallyNot given that he's a globalist sycophant bullshitter.

/u/Markimus if you want these related chart links.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (63 children)

https://i.ibb.co/Ks0yPrj/interracial-rape-crime.jpg JPG

Thanks for this image. I'd be more interested in data directly from the source. Some there's less chance of the person interpreting the data making a mistake.

https://i.ibb.co/Dbsd0Cr/interracial-rape-crime-1996-2008.jpg

This image has a pretty bad maths error.

(271,224/24,304)/5.75 is about 1.9, not 64. Did you make this image yourself? Did you hope I wouldn't do the aritmetic?

Picture this crime curve: https://i.ibb.co/t3ghCkf/interracial-crime-violence-1.png Except for interracial rape the curve is exponentially more up the hockey stick.

The x-axis isn't even numeric. The categories be put in any order. The curve is meaningless. What do you claim the exponenial equation is then, genius?

Black men rape a lot of white women. The reverse is rare.

Not exactly. You've only presented data for convictions. Black men are convicted of raping white women a lot. The reverse is rare. (But given the laughability of the analysis on these images, I'd feel more confident if you linked to the source.

This isn't rocket science.

And yet some numbnuts still got the arithmetic out by more than an order of magnitude and thought that a curve is an intelligent way to graph interracial violence ... not at a time series, on top of a bar chart of the fucking categories.

The stupidity of racists is the overwhelming take-home here.

[–][deleted]  (62 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (61 children)

    12% of the race population (black) spawned 11.16 times the number of interracial raping and that's before adjusting for population size. Now to get the sense of scale per capita, you have to multiply that 11.16 times 5.75 were the population on par with whites and what you get is 64.

    Well done! You've found some irrelevant numbers, and multiplied some of them!

    Let me read what you're trying to calculate for you:

    "[A] white woman is 64 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man."

    This is wrong. "[A] white woman is 1.9 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man (and that man be convicted) than a black woman is by a white man (and that man be convicted)."

    but that's a separate matter than comparing the odds of who's interracially raping.

    Is that what you calculated? What you were supposed to compere was the odds of who's being interracially raped. (Where only rapes that are successfully prosecuted are counted).

    For the full disclaimer to satisfy low IQs of neoliberals and most leftists

    Oh, the irony.

    [–][deleted]  (58 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Black-on-white rape is happening at least 11 times (the disparity is higher now) more often than white-on-black rape. And that's without adjusting for the fact that the black population is much smaller.

      This is what we would expect for two reasons.

      1 - Nigger women are repulsive, on the average. So many of them smell like vomit and look and act like apes.

      2 - Nigger men lack impulse control. When encountering something, their first thought is, can I rape it? If not, can I steal it? If not, can I destroy it. Rape, steal, destroy.

      [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

      There are actually 3 different ratios you can calculate from this statistic

      -Probability of perpetration

      -Probability of victimization

      -Frequency of occurrence

      All 3 of these are great indicators of the black-on-white rape epidemic in America. The only one that has been calculated correctly here is frequency of occurrence, which is 11x.

      [–][deleted]  (4 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        The rate of what's literally occurring (10x) isn't useful enough to adequately portray the fact that 10% of the population Group B is causing 10 times more of the interracial rape than the 90

        This would be the first ratio I mentioned, difference in probability of perpetration, which is what the image you posted attempted calculate, but seems to have mislabeled as the probability of victimization, but your point still stands either way. 2x, 11x, and 64x all prove the same point, which is niggers are rape machines.

        Edit: The image you provided should read, black men commit black/white interracial rape 64x more often than white men. But again, we all know the valid point being made here, regardless of which ratio you look at.

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          As your leftist friend already stated, these numbers are irrelevant. The entirety of the left, even feminists, dont care about women getting raped, or any other violence. If they did, they wouldn't be importing niggers and muslims to the west or denying and ignoring the problem. What they care about is gaining power and wealth. Rape is something they roll out when it fits their narrative, to create victim capital for women or minorities.

          They will shine the spotlight on certain real cases like Holtzclaw for the racism narrative or Cosby and Nassar for the metoo narrative, or make up cases like The Rolling Stone. But make no mistake, this has nothing to do with a sincere sympathy or desire to reduce rape. They want victimhood that fits their agenda, nothing more. This is why they simultaneously conceal and deny the rape epidemic at the hands of niggers and the same reason why you'll never get an honest response from them.

          They already know niggers go around raping and killing, but they simply don't care. Acknowledging it doesn't help them. Blacks and other "minorities" are their allies, so they look the other way. No data you show them would ever change their mind. They've already seen it.

          [–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Your gaslighting fails.

          But he's succeeding at his goal of getting people to engage with his bullshit so he can spread it all over saidit.

          [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (48 children)

          Black-on-white rape is happening at least 11 times (the disparity is higher now) more often than white-on-black rape. And that's without adjusting for the fact that the black population is much smaller.

          Surely this isn't as difficult as the racists in here are trying to pretend.

          The statistic quoted is the likelihood that a white woman is interracially raped compared to a black woman.

          You have to adjust for the white population being much larger.

          If you equalize the population to match the white population for that time period, it's * 5.75 = 64).

          Not the brightest crayon in the box now are we? Do you want to think about it again and get back to me on what the correct value for n is in "[A] white woman is n TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man."

          Hint, I've already shown it in comments in this thread.

          [–][deleted]  (47 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (46 children)

            The hypothetical is the only meaningful measure capable of showing the severity of the population's behavior compared to the other population

            The false statement "[A] white woman is 64 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man" is meaningful. It's about the risk of rape that white women face from black men compared to that that black women face from white men. They just got the maths wrong, and got 64 when the correct value is 1.9.

            And that 1.9 is going to be subject to some bias from reporting and conviction rates.

            [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

            Correct, 64x would be the likelihood of a black man perpetrating black/white interracial rape, when compared to a white man, which proves the point racists were trying make here. There are two good take aways from this discussion:

            1 - Black men lack impulse control

            2 - Black women are less desirable ("she's pretty for a black girl")

            Everyone already knew this though.

            [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

            Correct, 64x would be the likelihood of a black man perpetrating black/white interracial rape, when compared to a white man, which proves the point racists were trying make here. T

            They were trying to make a point about white woman being at a much greater likelihood of being raped by a black man than a black woman by a white man. Stoking the fear of the black man thing.

            The two things I have taken away from this discussion are:

            1) Racists lie to try to justify the fear that they live with.
            2) The racists here are exceptionally low IQ. It's not sufficient to point out their math errors, they can't do simple arithmetic, you have to walk them slowly through each basic calculation several times.

            1 - Black men lack impulse control
            2 - Black women are less desirable
            Everyone already knew this though.

            I didn't know those. Whats your best evidence for them?

            [–][deleted]  (11 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

              It's not meaningful.

              Yes it is. You have to understand the racist mindset. They live in constant overwhelming fear of other people, especially ones that don't look like them. This is why their family trees don't have branches.

              The 1.9 times is the risk of interracial rape (ignoring the bias in reporting and convictions. The true figure is plausibly more equal) for a white woman compared to a black woman. If you're a racist and therefore a coward, this is the point that you live by, and try to encourage the rest of the world to understand. You are in fear of black people. Now you have to justify it. Look in how much danger white women are in because of black men!

              You're diverting attention to poor wording of an image in order to miss the meaningful part.

              It's the poor math that's more outstanding.

              That has societal ramifications of populations going up and down and portraying a sense of scale of abuse. Behavior affects people: rapes, robs, kills, destroys people, and it certainly matters to the people victimized by it when the population of abusers goes up unchecked.

              See? There you go. It is about fear.

              Extreme example to hammer this point across for lurkers. I assume you'll ignore it, so it's not for you:

              Group A: 0.1% committing interracial rape. Group B: 50% committing interracial rape. Nation's population: 0.99999 of Group A and 0.00001 of Group B.

              I'll just point out some realities for those figures for the lurker. I assume you'll not understand it, so it's not for you:

              Someone from Group A intending to commit a rape will see 100,000 of their own race for every 1 of the other race. So, if they don't care who they rape, 0.1% of them committing interracial rape implies they each rape an average of 100 people.

              Someone from Group B intending to commit a rape will see 100,000 of the other race for every 1 of their race. So if they don't care who they rape, 50% of them committing interracial rape implies that they each rape an average of just under 0.5 people. (0.499995 people).

              So the "measurements that provide understanding are the rates of the action for each group and what that could amount to proportionately in civilization (given equal populations)", would be that in that case group A would be committing the vast majority of interracial rapes, due to the fact that the increased opportunity so dramatically outweighs the tendency to rape in this extreme example.

              [–]EuropeanAwakening14 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              Lol. You're literally just denying basic math to defend black criminals now. Bahahahhahaha. God damn this sub is better than a comedy show.

              It's obvious that you don't really understand how crime statistics are calculated. Stick around and learn something. Get over your ego. It's OK to be wrong as long as you correct yourself when shown your error.