Black Man Rapes Woman on Public Train, Media Complains People Stood by and Watched

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (70 children)

[removed]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Stats

    Only one woman went to the police about Holtzclaw. Only once he was charged did the other women come forward. 13 willing to testify. That's 12 that that didn't think they would be believed, but strong enough to go through the process, once it was clear that there would be an investigation.

    And this has what to do with black people thinking they're oppressed by white people? The case doesn't involve any white people and it's a case of a pig abusing his power, it has literally nothing to do with race relations at all.

    What the fuck are you smoking?

    Reality, you should try it when you turn off the television. Look at crime stats and the new institution of 'Karening' random white people. It's very easy to see that blacks know they're being given license to do what they want in America. They're even getting away with murder (18 year old black murdered a 16 year old white by stabbing him to death and got away with it due to the white supremacist system covering its tracks or something!!11!). You would know this if you were informing yourself on reality instead of just watching jewish television and films that tell you that up is down.

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    They're even getting away with murder

    Did you read the link?

    The kid got away with self defence. Do you think that you shouldn't be able to defend yourself when you're attacked?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Yeah bro 16 year old white kids randomly pick fights with older black kids, this is something that definitely has ever happened even once in human history.

    The reason no one intervened with the black raping the woman on the train is because everybody knows blacks carry weapons constantly and they don't want to be stabbed or shot to death. Anyone who even pretends to believe this black guy was just an innocent nice guy minding his business when a savage younger UNARMED white male attacked him unprovoked is a certified TVbrain with a dangerously inhibited brain function.

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Yeah bro 16 year old white kids randomly pick fights with older black kids, this is something that definitely has ever happened even once in human history.

    There were lynchings of black kids by whites that I remember. The people that did them probably remember them too.

    Anyone who even pretends to believe this black guy was just an innocent nice guy minding his business when a savage younger UNARMED white male attacked him unprovoked is a certified TVbrain with a dangerously inhibited brain function.

    Well that's what the jury found. Take it up with the legal system.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    There were lynchings of black kids by whites that I remember. The people that did them probably remember them too.

    I don't see how community watches handing justice to criminals has any relation whatsoever to this black savagely stabbing a 16 year old kid to death. Are you suggesting to bring them back for him? Seems a bit oldschool for my liking but if that's what you're into.

    Well that's what the jury found. Take it up with the legal system.

    Ah I see you definitely are advocating that. Well you changed your tune! Have fun with your little lynch squad.

    [–]Yin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (64 children)

    ActuallyNot, image links have been mirrored for your convenience, because your globalist tyrannical scum "government" (Australia) censors/bans 4pleb and you're too scared to get a VPN and learn:

    Zero should be interpreted as near zero. White on black rape has been extremely low for a long time. The reverse disparity has been getting worse. In other words, the following sampling ranging back to 1996 is now misleading, but even then it's still damning:

    Now adjust for population sizes during those time periods. The black population is around 13%. The real figure depends on interpretation with mixed kids inheriting various related genes/traits influencing this subject at higher rates but I must digress for simplicity.

    Picture this crime curve:

    Except for interracial rape the curve is exponentially more up the hockey stick.

    Black men rape a lot of white women. The reverse is rare. This isn't rocket science.

    This is more for readers, not ActuallyNot given that he's a globalist sycophant bullshitter.

    /u/Markimus if you want these related chart links.

    [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (63 children)

    https://i.ibb.co/Ks0yPrj/interracial-rape-crime.jpg JPG

    Thanks for this image. I'd be more interested in data directly from the source. Some there's less chance of the person interpreting the data making a mistake.

    https://i.ibb.co/Dbsd0Cr/interracial-rape-crime-1996-2008.jpg

    This image has a pretty bad maths error.

    (271,224/24,304)/5.75 is about 1.9, not 64. Did you make this image yourself? Did you hope I wouldn't do the aritmetic?

    Picture this crime curve: https://i.ibb.co/t3ghCkf/interracial-crime-violence-1.png Except for interracial rape the curve is exponentially more up the hockey stick.

    The x-axis isn't even numeric. The categories be put in any order. The curve is meaningless. What do you claim the exponenial equation is then, genius?

    Black men rape a lot of white women. The reverse is rare.

    Not exactly. You've only presented data for convictions. Black men are convicted of raping white women a lot. The reverse is rare. (But given the laughability of the analysis on these images, I'd feel more confident if you linked to the source.

    This isn't rocket science.

    And yet some numbnuts still got the arithmetic out by more than an order of magnitude and thought that a curve is an intelligent way to graph interracial violence ... not at a time series, on top of a bar chart of the fucking categories.

    The stupidity of racists is the overwhelming take-home here.

    [–][deleted]  (62 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (61 children)

      12% of the race population (black) spawned 11.16 times the number of interracial raping and that's before adjusting for population size. Now to get the sense of scale per capita, you have to multiply that 11.16 times 5.75 were the population on par with whites and what you get is 64.

      Well done! You've found some irrelevant numbers, and multiplied some of them!

      Let me read what you're trying to calculate for you:

      "[A] white woman is 64 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man."

      This is wrong. "[A] white woman is 1.9 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man (and that man be convicted) than a black woman is by a white man (and that man be convicted)."

      but that's a separate matter than comparing the odds of who's interracially raping.

      Is that what you calculated? What you were supposed to compere was the odds of who's being interracially raped. (Where only rapes that are successfully prosecuted are counted).

      For the full disclaimer to satisfy low IQs of neoliberals and most leftists

      Oh, the irony.

      [–][deleted]  (58 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Black-on-white rape is happening at least 11 times (the disparity is higher now) more often than white-on-black rape. And that's without adjusting for the fact that the black population is much smaller.

        This is what we would expect for two reasons.

        1 - Nigger women are repulsive, on the average. So many of them smell like vomit and look and act like apes.

        2 - Nigger men lack impulse control. When encountering something, their first thought is, can I rape it? If not, can I steal it? If not, can I destroy it. Rape, steal, destroy.

        [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        There are actually 3 different ratios you can calculate from this statistic

        -Probability of perpetration

        -Probability of victimization

        -Frequency of occurrence

        All 3 of these are great indicators of the black-on-white rape epidemic in America. The only one that has been calculated correctly here is frequency of occurrence, which is 11x.

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          The rate of what's literally occurring (10x) isn't useful enough to adequately portray the fact that 10% of the population Group B is causing 10 times more of the interracial rape than the 90

          This would be the first ratio I mentioned, difference in probability of perpetration, which is what the image you posted attempted calculate, but seems to have mislabeled as the probability of victimization, but your point still stands either way. 2x, 11x, and 64x all prove the same point, which is niggers are rape machines.

          Edit: The image you provided should read, black men commit black/white interracial rape 64x more often than white men. But again, we all know the valid point being made here, regardless of which ratio you look at.

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Your gaslighting fails.

            But he's succeeding at his goal of getting people to engage with his bullshit so he can spread it all over saidit.

            [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (48 children)

            Black-on-white rape is happening at least 11 times (the disparity is higher now) more often than white-on-black rape. And that's without adjusting for the fact that the black population is much smaller.

            Surely this isn't as difficult as the racists in here are trying to pretend.

            The statistic quoted is the likelihood that a white woman is interracially raped compared to a black woman.

            You have to adjust for the white population being much larger.

            If you equalize the population to match the white population for that time period, it's * 5.75 = 64).

            Not the brightest crayon in the box now are we? Do you want to think about it again and get back to me on what the correct value for n is in "[A] white woman is n TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man."

            Hint, I've already shown it in comments in this thread.

            [–][deleted]  (47 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (46 children)

              The hypothetical is the only meaningful measure capable of showing the severity of the population's behavior compared to the other population

              The false statement "[A] white woman is 64 TIMES more liked to be raped by a black man that a black woman is by a white man" is meaningful. It's about the risk of rape that white women face from black men compared to that that black women face from white men. They just got the maths wrong, and got 64 when the correct value is 1.9.

              And that 1.9 is going to be subject to some bias from reporting and conviction rates.

              [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

              Correct, 64x would be the likelihood of a black man perpetrating black/white interracial rape, when compared to a white man, which proves the point racists were trying make here. There are two good take aways from this discussion:

              1 - Black men lack impulse control

              2 - Black women are less desirable ("she's pretty for a black girl")

              Everyone already knew this though.

              [–][deleted]  (11 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]EuropeanAwakening14 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                Lol. You're literally just denying basic math to defend black criminals now. Bahahahhahaha. God damn this sub is better than a comedy show.

                It's obvious that you don't really understand how crime statistics are calculated. Stick around and learn something. Get over your ego. It's OK to be wrong as long as you correct yourself when shown your error.