you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

You survey a sample of people.

That's not objective data. That's personal opinion and means someone is alleging a crime has been committed. Do these surveys also interview the alleged rapist and ask them their opinion about whether a rape has been committed? We have this wonderful Anglo-Saxon tradition of juris prudence where you're innocent until PROVEN guilty. It's fantastic and means I can't just say 'ActuallyNot' is a pedophile without evidence. There's actually no way to truthfully claim 'most rapes aren't reported' because the only way in any reasonable society to determine if a rape has occurred or not is by subjecting the claim to proper scrutiny. Personal opinion does not mean a rape has necessarily occurred.

I asked "How do you know that it's not that there's no black mothers reporting rapes of the daughters by white guys to the police, because the police are, in some areas, hostile to the black population?"

No you said "If you're aware that race doesn't bias the reporting of child molestation, show me the data that supports that: Because I'd be interested to know." In other words you asked the other guy to disprove your evidence free assertion of bias. It doesn't work like that. You make the assertion, and you back it up. You don't ask people to disprove your own claim with evidence. And another point about your quote about Black rape is that you're doing the exact same thing. You're saying 'how do you know my totally speculative and evidence free assertion isn't happening???'. You seem to not understand the basics of debating.

But if you're going to allege that "In almost every case, the race of the victim and the perpetrator are the same", you need to supply the evidence, for your as of now evidence free assertion.

It's not my claim -- I'm sure it's true though -- but I'm sure if Mustard can be bothered he'll look that up for you and prove it true.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

This is the same user that didn't believe me when I told him blacks we're responsible for America's high gun crime rates. I showed him a credible article that proved young black men literally get shot 20x more than young white men. He believes it is because racist white people drive to the ghetto, shoot blacks, then leave, without being prosecuted, as an explanation, lololol. He's playing dumb. Dont bother.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

He mods the same subsaidit that socks always promotes (he is the headmod), they're probably alts of the same guy or just upper middle class urbanite friends that watch CNN 24/7.

AmericanMuskrat is another mod from there that likes to troll this place in the exact same style socks and ActuallyNot does too. They're probably friends or alts of the same guy.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

Lel, Muskrat is extremely transparent about a ton of things, even to a somewhat disgusting degree.

Did you guys start menstruating? What the hell is up with these witch hunts? They're different than the usual.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Lol yeah the community just one day for no reason at all decided to irrationally attack these people!

Where have I heard this narrative before?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

You're starting to haul in the normals now. It's irrational.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

What's normal about making completely nonsensical assertions and feigning incredulity when proven wrong, poking the bear and then reporting people who take the bait etc?

This sounds like good faith debate to you? I hope you're not actually this naive, I'd hate to think what kind of things women will do to you if you're unable to see flags this bright red.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

You're going to have people here with opinions that don't sidle up with yours, even among your own group. I'm not arguing the validity of some of your known and notorious trolls from your previous peddit spot. I'm pointing out that you're making irrational assumptions of users here being alts of other users because they're trolling. Reporting is a retarded copout either way, should be reserved for bots.

I hope you're not actually this naive, I'd hate to think what kind of things women will do to you if you're unable to see flags this bright red.

Nice. Are you trying to insult my masculinity?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I'm pointing out that you're making irrational assumptions of users here being alts of other users because they're trolling.

Maybe level up your reading comprehension. I simply said they're trolling, which they are. I said they could possibly be one guy with alts like the other user due to the similarity between their trolling styles. It is not irrational because it's well informed and it's not an assumption because I assumed nothing, I simply stated a possibility.

Nice. Are you trying to insult my masculinity?

No. I literally said exactly 1:1 what I meant, that you're naive if you think people trolling for >1 year are honest actors. Again, level up your reading comprehension.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It is not irrational because it's well informed and it's not an assumption because I assumed nothing, I simply stated a possibility.

AmericanMuskrat is another mod from there that likes to troll this place in the exact same style socks and ActuallyNot does too. They're probably friends or alts of the same guy.

It's not well informed if you make every effort possible to ignore these people's activity outside of your sub.

I literally said exactly 1:1 what I meant, that you're naive if you think people trolling for >1 year are honest actors.

Then why use that example?