you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yin 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Every time it's black on white crime, the globalist media goes out of their way to bury the race nationally.

Every time it's white on black crime, the globalist media goes out of their way to race hustle and make it about race with 24-7 coverage internationally.

Worse yet:

A vast portion of black on white violence is blatantly fueled by racial hatred: hatred of whites (and asians and hispanics), all sorts of anti-white slurs said during the crime.

A vast portion of white on black crime is blatantly not fueled by race (it's unrelated/tangential).

Play role reversal next time you see a story about some black man or woman abusing a white man or woman. Switch the races and think what the coverage would be.

The double standard is so vast and sick it's genocidal.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Look up the statistics.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    No, Yin.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      [–]Yin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Examples

      It hovers around the same proportions every year in modern history. The past couple years are getting worse in general for everything given globalists force-crashing nations to try to institute medical tyranny for full globalist tyranny.

      [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Lol. This is the laziest debate response I've ever seen from you. Not even an attempt at a rebuttal just a 'no'. It's crystal clearly you have no desire to entertain the arguments of others and change or reflect. Socks that's the very definition of bad faith debate. What do you have to say for yourself?

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      What do you have to say for yourself?

      Are you attacking me, and requiring me to respond?

      You'd have to see the other responses to Yin. I've provided a number of responses to Yin, which you can read in my comment history. I am surprised you've not seen the other responses. The history of my responses to Yin over the past few months would also help, though you don't have to bother looking at those. The recent responses - you'll see if you wish to see to see them - have addressed the main topics of our discussion, and threads like this - particularly with Yin and some others - can extend for dozens of back and forth comments. Rather than torture Yin with numerous comments, my final comment is merely 'no', to which Yin said 'yes'. We both know at this stage that we've covered the issues we wanted to cover, without carrying on the discourse into an hour-long argument. What's rather sad is that you'd like me to explain this to you - but I hope this helps.