Durocher wrote an article about the Zemmour phenomenon in France and got slaughtered in the comments section in unz

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bagarmoossen 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

If a European country has the potential to elect a leader who explicitly talks about The Great Replacement, believes his country's identity is linked to it having a White Christian majority, cites Renaud Camus in his speeches, is radically anti-feminist and anti-LGBT, is anti-American and pro-Russia, denounces liberalism and the French Revolution as well as unrestrained capitalism and financialization, I am going to support that leader, even if that leader is Jewish, yes. Especially considering this is a cultured and well-spoken man who clearly understands and cherishes European civilization, unlike the people currently in charge of demolishing it.

Tearing ourselves apart because "muh ugly african jew" seems petty and irresponsible, considering how little time we have left to reverse this dire state of affairs before the demographic point of no-return is reached. I also don't buy the claims that he is a plant. If anything, sanitized and incompetent Marine Le Pen seems to act more as a placeholder, a bulwark against White working-class anger who is guaranteed to lose every contest she takes part in.

What advantage would our enemies derive from replacing eternal loser Le Pen with a more energetic figure who is opening the floodgates for radical, explicit identitarian discourse in Europe while having an actual shot at winning? Wouldn't a plant try to deflect the anger away from White identitarianism (like Trump and Kushner did), instead of fanning its flames and mainstreaming it, like Zemmour has been doing?

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Wouldn't a plant try to deflect the anger away from White identitarianism (like Trump and Kushner did), instead of fanning its flames and mainstreaming it, like Zemmour has been doing?

Trump played to anti-immigration and America first sentiments on the campaign trail. After taking office, it was all about based blacks, Israel is our greatest ally, dems are the real homophobes and ''I want the largest numbers of immigrants ever, but it has to be done legally".

[–]Bagarmoossen 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

DR viewpoints had precisely zero representation in the GOP until recently, while in France, the right is very much invested in the issues Éric Zemmour talks about, there is a much stronger countercultural current in France that could sustain his government. I personally believe he would accomplish a lot more than Trump. I also can see no possible advantage for the anti-White camp to have the Great Replacement theory being discussed in presidential debates.

I'm not saying this man is going to be our salvation or anything, as he will probably run into many difficulties if he can actually win. I do not expect a positive agenda to be implemented in its entirety. I am happy enough with the cultural effect this is generating and with the fact that the mainstream immigration debate is now being framed in terms of ethnic and religious demographics for the first time since WWII. That kind of thing is actual accelerationism, literally accelerating the ideological shift. I can see no rational explanation for our enemies to "plant" someone like Zemmour, since time is on their side they'd be better off with Marine ignoring racial replacement and talking about nationalizing roads and holding a 'referendum on immigration' that would never actually happen because she can't get past 1/3 of the vote in a runoff.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

'referendum on immigration'

That's the road to electoral victory. The tories under Cameron won by holding a referendum on Brexit.

The thing is that it's likely they're deploying this trojan horse exactly because of the shifting cultural dynamic. The French people have become increasingly fed up with the regime's relentless attacks on their heritage and freedoms and their yellow vest protests were the first of its kind in decades where common white men took to the streets against the state.

It's possible they've deployed Zemmour so he can take over the far-right and neuter this grassroots energy by redirecting it towards saving French ''culture'', assimilating foreigners, and giving Arabs French names. It's reminiscent of the retarded ''French-language'' grift of Quebec nationalists. Their land is being flooded with negro rapists and all they can talk about is how they got schools to teach French or some tripe like that.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Zemmour has been saying the same thing for decades.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trump was always overrated by the Right. Even in 2016 he only complained about illegal immigration which he still does now. He never mentioned demographics or cheap labour for businesses when attacking illegal immigration nor did he suggest lessening legal immigration.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trump played to anti-immigration and America first sentiments on the campaign trail.

He never came anywhere close to Zemmour's rhetoric.