The wrong side won WW2.

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

In all of human history, whenever another military invades a country and defeats them, it usually stems from the fact that they brought superior technology and civilization with them.

That is incorrect.

In fact, it makes me a bit annoyed when I read some DAR members who come out against Space exploration

I have no idea what you people see in space exploration.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I have no idea what you people see in space exploration.

Within a couple of hundreds of millions of years from now, the Sun will become so bright that it will boil the Earth, guaranteed to kill all complex life on Earth. In around 5 billion years, when the Sun will start to reach the end of its life cycle, it will massively grow in size and literally swallow the Earth.

So for people like me, reasons for supporting space exploration aren't just because "it's cool" or "I F*CKING LOVE SCIENCE!!", it's literally about survival. If you want the white race, or the human species as a whole, to survive long term (which I do), developing interstellar space travel, and the subsequent colonization of Earth-like exoplanets, will be an absolute necessity.

Alternatively, we could try to develop highly advanced technology to move the Earth further away from the Sun, and try to harness enough energy from the Sun (with a Dyson sphere or something similar) to be able to actually power this technology, but given how unfeasible this would be even compared to something like interstellar space travel, we're probably better off continuing to focus on developing more advanced and efficient space travel technology in the hope that it will eventually enable us to reach for the stars and spread our posterity all throughout the Galaxy.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Within a couple of hundreds of millions of years from now

The sun will be a red giant in 5 billion years. Life on earth has existed for 1 billion years. After a space of 100,000 or even 10,000 years, our descendants would be so far apart from us that they'd feel like a different species altogether.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

After a space of 100,000 or even 10,000 years, our descendants would be so far apart from us that they'd feel like a different species altogether.

It doesn't really matter. However different they will be from us, they will still be the closest thing resembling us genetically and phenotypically compared to other races and species. Maybe you don't care about your descendants surviving long-term, but I sure do. Of course, assuming we will win, eugenics and human genetic modification can also do its part in "fossilizing" traits common in whites, while making beneficial traits in whites more prominent and dysgenic traits less prominent. But no matter how different our descendants will be from us in hundreds of thousands of years from us, this will be such a gradual evolutionary process that we won't even notice it. Whites from 10 000 years ago were pretty much the same as us genetically and phenotypically, so assuming we will manage to stop dysgenics by implementing eugenics and human genetic modification, whites from 10 000 years in the future will still be very similar to us, definitely similar enough to the point that they would be biologically classified as white by today's standards.