you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

It makes sense for women to gravitate towards one another for companionship after menopause (and I don't just mean that sexually), you don't give a shit about fighting over mates anymore, you're done with kids. Penetrative sex is less comfortable for menopausal and post-menopausal women, unless they're on HRT-- which can be dangerous in it's own ways. In the age of Viagra, the risk is probably higher for cheating partners than it used to be when men would chill the fuck out after their dicks stopped working.

You seem to think this is ok. Yes men and women are different, that's one of the points I am making. Jilted men destroyed by divorce or otherwise had bad experiences with women don't start taking a liking to dick. But that women are fluid ismprexisly why it need to be discouraged by society.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Why is it a problem that women past reproductive years look for companionship within their own sex class? Again, it doesn't even necessarily have to be sexual. The red pill considers the wall to be of some sort of significance, right? If someone looks at it through that lens, they're no longer considered valuable or have sexual market value. If that's the case, is it more of a moral issue for you or something else?

I'm not attacking male sexuality here though. Why are you bringing that up as a point?

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I already explained that. First, Elvira in particular is a big role model. So is Kate Pierson. You are fucking naive if you think this only pertains to menopausal women. A cousin of mine who dated men for years wnrt lesbian, married some horse faced Jewish broad (with last name ending I. berg) who has a history of going after sexually confused women. Her ex that she bought a trip to Spain for left her, married a guy and ha see a baby's although she (Beeg's ex) is still a leftist dunt. Stop acting like social mores don't matter.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Who are these women role models for? They found their claim to fame as sex symbols. That's not role model material. I don't want my daughter looking at Elvira and saying that she wants to use her body for fame just like that woman did when she grows up.

If we're arguing over social mores, I'll take lesbians over women that get to the top by utilizing sexuality. Pretending that either route is likely to lead towards a traditional nuclear family is a little ridiculous, and if anything it's even more harmful for women like that to have that kind of fame and have children of their own to see it and potentially model after it.

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

That you do not like they are role models does not change the fact that they are. Beautiful, alluring women have always been role modles for women throughout history.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

She's supposedly been in a relationship for around 20 years with the same woman. If she's just now spilling the beans, I wonder if she was worried about backlash or something. I mean, she may be a role model for style maybe? Sort of like how Bettie Page and other pinup girls have a style that's taken on by the Rockabilly scene and other alt groups. I don't know. She's beautiful, even at her age, but wanting her as a role model when her big draw was sex appeal is a big no. Wanting her as a role model because she's a relatively funny, spooky bitch into old B horror films-- that's entirely different. Girls don't need to be looking up to sex symbols for inspiration, that teaches them that their worth lives there and it goes away as soon as they're no longer sexually appealing.