Soyientific American: Pedophobes are hidden pedophiles

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

Feminists must also love rape because they speak so much against it...oh wait.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

61% of Women have rape fantasies.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-myths-sex/202003/why-are-rape-fantasies-so-common

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Note thst 61% is not the entirety. Note also that psychologytoday contains a lot of dogshit, and psychology is, at best, a pseudoscience.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

And its probably only in the west

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

68% of non-binary participants had fantasized about this before, while 31% said they fantasized about it often.

I mean.. the reliability of a paper that includes stupid shit like this, by a field that recognizes it as completely A-OK should be questioned. It's corrupted as fuck.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I am glad that I never have to take that course but doctors here have to take it in a basic level

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I took two in high school, one as part of a diploma program years back, and then another in college. There's fields within it that are useful, but there's just so much retarded pseudosciency aspects that seem more like the philosophy of how things work vs how they actually work-- since those fields rely more on what a patient tells you, and then deductive reasoning from there. It's two points of possible fallacy from not only the patient, but who is actually doing the observances and their own reliability, ability to maintain objectivity, etc.