Soyientific American: Pedophobes are hidden pedophiles

submitted by casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter from self.debatealtright

https://twitter.com/Semiogogue/status/1436814803935375367/photo/1

It's coming, they're going to normalize pedophilia. It's the same tactic with the gay movement. If you don't like fags you must secretly be one.

Blue checks in 2026 will be posting the pedophile flag and posting how proud they are of their kids for entering into pedophile relations with older men.

If you criticize it, you'll be termed as a ''soyience denier''

all 24 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Arachnophobic, huh?

[–]Nombre27 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

First thing that came to mind for me too.

[–]Ponderer 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just so everyone knows it looks like the original image is a photoshop/parody of this Scientific American article, "Homophobes might be hidden homosexuals." It has the same author, tagline, and date (but the actual publication year is 2012 rather than 2019). Credit to literalotherkin for discovering this.

Also, not saying that elites aren't actually advocating for pedophilia or that they don't use this bullshit argument to further it or other kinds of degeneracy. Abominations like Cuties or DQSH make this apparent. However I don't think they're at the point of unironically using the term "pedophobe" yet.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I secretly want to fall to my death from a high cliff.

I also secretly want to be beaten to death by blegs.

[–]IslamofascistDeath to America, Death to Israel, Death to The Ukraine 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

They won't ever normalize young girls marrying older men, because that will go completely against elite interests. That would strengthen hardline religious fundamentalists who hate the system and who already push girls to marry as young as possible. What the elites want is to normalize young girls posting borderline pornographic pics of themselves on social media or pimping themselves out on OnlyFans in their teens. They basically want to turn girls into e-prostitutes as young as possible to destroy families and normal sexual relationships. The elites themselves already have ample sexual access to young females, as the case of Jeffrey Epstein makes clear, so they won't benefit from lowering the age of consent. If anything, I think elites get a rush from breaking laws.

Another thing that the elites will definitely promote is pederasty, i.e. sodomite relationships between older men and younger boys. This will destroy the soul and mind of young boys and turn them into broken, traumatized slaves of ZOG. That should be clearly differentiated from pedophilia, which has become a largely meaningless phrase thanks to its stupid use by modern scum. According to modern scum, a 30-year old who is sexually attracted to a 16-year old girl is a "pedophile", and a man who is sexually attracted to a 2-month old infant is also a "pedophile". They use the same word in reference to both people, which shows how stupid modern people are.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hostility to pedophilia is also highly correlated with being right wing from what I've read.

They will stop at absolutely nothing to deconstruct and delegitimize the healthy instincts of ordinary people because ordinary people -- ordinary is the wrong word well adjusted is better -- hate liberalism of their variety.

I posted the article about the German 'sexologist' published the other day in the New Yorker who was part of a government sponsored post-war German project to house transient children with known pedophiles for, among other reasons, ideas related to anti-fascist social engineering.

This isn't new for the left the dog is simply returning to his vomit.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They've already posted headlines saying opposition to abortion, pornography, immigration, and homosexuality is antisemitic.

Rest assured that the same will be done for pedophilia.

NYT in 2025: "The attack on Minor attracted persons is an attack on Judaism and it reeks of white supremacy"

The mask is about to fully come off.

[–]Richard_Parker 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

By this logic, Antifa and anti-fascists must actually love Nazis. Antti Trumpers actually support trump. People like who ardently oppose the DNC are actually died in the whole Hilary Clinton style democrats.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Feminists must also love rape because they speak so much against it...oh wait.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

61% of Women have rape fantasies.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-myths-sex/202003/why-are-rape-fantasies-so-common

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Note thst 61% is not the entirety. Note also that psychologytoday contains a lot of dogshit, and psychology is, at best, a pseudoscience.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

And its probably only in the west

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

68% of non-binary participants had fantasized about this before, while 31% said they fantasized about it often.

I mean.. the reliability of a paper that includes stupid shit like this, by a field that recognizes it as completely A-OK should be questioned. It's corrupted as fuck.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I am glad that I never have to take that course but doctors here have to take it in a basic level

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I took two in high school, one as part of a diploma program years back, and then another in college. There's fields within it that are useful, but there's just so much retarded pseudosciency aspects that seem more like the philosophy of how things work vs how they actually work-- since those fields rely more on what a patient tells you, and then deductive reasoning from there. It's two points of possible fallacy from not only the patient, but who is actually doing the observances and their own reliability, ability to maintain objectivity, etc.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it's true tho they like it but they want to be held down by a chad, and it's not really rape if they want it

[–]Richard_Parker 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I get shit on the r/adamcarolla subreddit for denouncing transgender lunacy to the extent still permitted by reddit. Lately this one twerp keeps replying "Richard Parker always talking about chicks with dicks." Yeah not bc I am secretly drawn to it or aroused by it, but because it is a band to any sane civilization and needs to resisted and fought to the further extent possible.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Isn't a pedophobe someone who doesn't like children?

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pedophilophobe is the proper term.

[–]Ponderer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hate to be that guy but I don't think that article actually existed

Can't find it online (iirc Netflix still has Cuties up which was far more flagrant, I don't see why SA would take down an article from 2019) not even mirrored anywhere, the pic looks a bit shooped, and the text below the headline sounds a little too much like bait or Babylon Bee tier satire

Feel free to prove me wrong and share an archived version of the article if you can find one

I agree that the elites are attempting to normalize pedophilia and they use the bullshit "if you don't like it you're one of them" tactic, but we need to be accurate about where on the timeline we're on

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Parody of this one? https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/homophobes-might-be-hidden-homosexuals/

Same author, similar topic. You're right though can't find it listed among her articles at Scientific American.

[–]Ponderer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good catch. I think you nailed it.

The pic in OP appears to just be a parody of that one (albeit a justified parody) lampooning how ridiculous the "if you oppose this you must be one" idea is.

[–]DisgustResponse 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As Ponderer says below, it's a fake headline. The real headline is "Homophobes are Hidden Homosexuals", which is situationally true, since the correct response to being gay is to treat it as a malignant condition deserving of shame and self-control. The f*gs who flaunt their illness to the world are the deviant and contemptible ones.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you can castrate children and feed them poison then it's not hard to justify "giving them love".

Pedophilia was one of the agendas of sexual revolution. Free love, with people of all ages. Pedophiles marched openly on pride parades until they put lid on it.

Check Nambla or PIE.