The suffragettes were rabid eugenicists

submitted by [deleted] from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

They were simply conforming to the existing intellectual zeitgeist of the time. Feminists today similarly conform to the dominant zeitgeist: negrolatry, homosexuality and anti whiteness

[–]outrageousboote 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Except some "radfems" who don't like trannies, but they support woke ideology every step of the way until it harms them on a sex basis.

[–]Ponderer 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This is why I find it incredibly difficult to sympathize with radfems. Despite opposing trans ideology, they still deny fundamental sex differences. That basic denial of reality is the very thing that made trans ideology possible.

That's not to mention all the other ways radical feminism enabled trans ideology and helped it to come into being.

[–]NayenezganiNot alt-right 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Despite opposing trans ideology, they still deny fundamental sex differences.

Whenever radical feminists mention fundamental sex differences, it is usually to assert that males are innately depraved while somehow females are "socialized" into being cowardly and credulous. At least most of them are more rational about Islam than liberal feminists. But they still make the mistake of believing Islam is uniquely degenerate. There are violent societies in the Amazon that make the Saudis look like a bunch of lesbian separatist cat farmers.