you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is a white person who wants whites all over the world to gain more political power, at the expense of the political power of Jews and non-whites, a "white globalist" to you? And if so, why would you consider that a bad thing, assuming you're white yourself? Because most of the time I've heard the term "white globalist" being used, it wasn't someone calling himself that, it was being used as a pejorative/accusation, similar to terms like "wignat", "Duginist", "racist liberal", "MarxNat", etc.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Globalism in general is not the proper course of action.

[–]YORAMRWWhite nationalist, eugenicist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree, but whites becoming the most powerful group on the planet again (and possibly having colonies) wouldn't be globalism, that would just be imperialism or expansionism (nationalism and ingroup preference taken to its logical conclusion).

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do not believe that is the logical conclusion.