These days I can't read about a single terror event from the last 30 or so years without coming to the conclusion that the event was a false-flag. Before 2012 I was complacent, willing to accept the narrative at face-value, I believed most of what the media and government told me. So what happened in 2012—why was it such a landmark year in the propaganda war? Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES). Before today I’d never really thought about the sharp turn in reporting that began in 2012 (truth/facts exchanged for complete fabrication). Recently it’s impossible not to notice the media’s corruption but, prior to 2012 all I noticed was a continual quality-decline in anchors and (what I thought was) occasional misinformation. People are imperfect, they make mistakes and have other vices that can influence their behavior. The media is made up of people so before 2012, I chalked up most problems I noticed in the media to human nature--it seemed like most reporters (not pundits) were primarily interested in finding the truth aka investigative reporting. Today, as I read that Remington has requested the attendance records of students and teachers allegedly slain in the supposed Sandy Hook massacre, I remembered that SHES was the event that broke my trust in media. I decided to take another look at it and I came across something interesting that I don’t recall hearing or reading about back in 2012--the 2012 modernization of the SMITH-MUNDT Act. Under Obama, the changes made to SMITH-MUNDT allowed for the US Government to legally propagandize domestically. This was a HUGE step toward total-control and fits perfectly with the changes we've witnessed in the media over the last decade. When Obama said that his presidency would, "Fundamentally change America," he wasn't kidding around.