you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

A terrible decision, now Texas' demographics will accelerate further into the shitter along with crime going up, IQ going down etc.

The Republicans exist solely to destroy the white race, far more than the Democrats. The Democrats are anti-white in speech but in action they give you tax credits, healthcare, end the wars, force the FBI to release 9/11 documents etc. The Republicans pretend to be your friend whilst they open your border, kill your cousin with opiates that you other cousin died in Afghanistan to procure for ZOG, ban abortion so your race gets displaced etc.

[–]Bagarmoossen 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

The demographic effects will be marginal, if there are any at all. White children are also being killed on an industrial scale by the abortion industry. Abortion is primarily a moral issue with extremely wide-reaching social and cultural consequences and we should not frame it in terms of "percentage of non-white vs. white children killed". It is terrible optics and diverts us from the core issue here, which is hyper-individualistic, selfish women being allowed to kill their children without the father's consent because they don't want to deal with the consequences of their reckless actions.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

No, 39% of abortions are white. This is massive underrepresentation.

The people who get abortions are: stupid, drug addicted, single parents, financially unstable etc. Why would you want to force these people to have children, just for those children to be neglected or abused on average? A minority of them might have 2 parent families, and maybe a tiny percentage of them would have a decent life. The vast majority of them are going to have terrible lives, all because of you weirdo radical liberals that push liberal egalitarianism to its most extreme with psuedo-moralism.

This is before even mentioning rape, incest, disabilities etc.

[–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada! 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

So you think that it is OK to kill WHITE children because they are poor?

The reason why poor White children have a terrible life is because our capitalist shithole society treats poor people like shit. Instead of advocating killing the children of the poor, why not advocate a socialist system that throws the rich Jews out of power and helps poor people have a decent life?

By the way I don't know any European third positionist group who advocate your ideology. First shilling (((vaccines))), now supporting abortion of White children. A real third positionist would support increasing the White birth rate by any means necessary and providing help for all Whites to live a decent life, regardless of anything else.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I do advocate that system, but that system doesn't exist now so why would I fight to create more suffering for white people? Retard moment

[–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada! 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

More suffering white people = more angry revolutionaries to recruit.

But aside from that, how is killing White children justified by anything? Ask any third postionist in Europe whether they are OK with white abortions. No serious one is.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Curious, all of a sudden you know a bunch of third positionists and they're not just these retards you make up. Almost as if you're just a bad actor who makes shit up constantly.

[–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

No, I know a lot about the European third positionist movement. Where is your source that they hold your views?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Where is your source I ever claimed any particular group agrees with me about literally anything ever? Why would I care about such a thing? You're a really dumb kike if you think this kind of thing is effective forum sliding.

[–]NolobenGlory to Great Russian Empire! Today Ukraine, tomorrow Canada! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I didn't. But you insist that third positionists DON'T agree with my view.