you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

A terrible decision, now Texas' demographics will accelerate further into the shitter along with crime going up, IQ going down etc.

The Republicans exist solely to destroy the white race, far more than the Democrats. The Democrats are anti-white in speech but in action they give you tax credits, healthcare, end the wars, force the FBI to release 9/11 documents etc. The Republicans pretend to be your friend whilst they open your border, kill your cousin with opiates that you other cousin died in Afghanistan to procure for ZOG, ban abortion so your race gets displaced etc.

[–]FrenologistSaving the World 1 Cranial Exam at a Time 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

The white nationalist argument that abortion is good because it's used primarily by non-whites is a deal-breaker for the majority of religious conservatives. I think this argument is an intentionally planted poison-pill because this single topic will forever keep white nationalism from gaining a foothold in politics.

There's no need to push rhetoric that most people find repulsive. The key to forming a white nationalist movement is to promote culture and community. People are naturally drawn to other people of like-mind/values (culture) and people who share cultural values tend to also share skin-color.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I don't particularly care what's a deal breaker for extremely low IQ, liberal-egalitarian, decaying old people to be honest with you. They aren't the target demographic for a national-liberation, revolutionary vanguard.

Abortion is objectively good, it alleviates a LOT of unnecessary suffering. You can be horrified at the depravity of abortion whilst also recognising it is a necessary evil because without it every single one of those babies would have had a horrible life and the vast majority of them would go on to be anti-social in many respects.

[–]FrenologistSaving the World 1 Cranial Exam at a Time 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Where you're wrong is the generalization that ALL of these evangelicals (or even a large chunk of them) are, "Decaying old people."

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hilarious you acknowledge a generalisation and then immediately still strawman. This comment couldn't have been more obtuse, dishonest, and retarded if you tried.