Social Security costs to exceed revenue for 1st time in 39 years

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from (self.debatealtright)

Quote:

Funds are predicted to run dry in 2034, a year earlier than predicted.

Boomers are going to bankrupt all Western countries.

Article:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/social-security-costs-exceed-revenue-1st-time-39/story?id=79766491

all 32 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol, boomers are one awesome generation. Not only did they preside over the liquidation of their nation, culture, and history in their youth, they also staunchly guarded against any Reconquista in their twilight years. To top it off, as they go into the grave, they'll bankrupt the shit out of their descendants.

The Soviet Union was like this as well. One generation in their youth oversaw the destruction of Russia under Lenin and Stalin. They later presided over the post-Krushchev stagnation and the fall of the soviet union came just a decade after their own deaths.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

Boomers are going to bankrupt all Western countries.

Yes, "Boomers", that is people of a certain age going to work and raising families, planned to tank the economy. Fucking Boomers! Oh I know, they "voted" for all this. Uh huh, sure.

"Boomers" were teenagers when Hart-Celler passed, because the government did what the teenagers asked them to.

I'm so sick of this "Boomers did this!!!". It's stupid.

[–]Ponderer 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

Fully agree. The government does what it wants; the people have little to no input, regardless of their generation.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

They absolutely made a choice with hiring.

Over the last 10 years, I barely see any High School kids working the jobs at coffee shops, Mcdonalds, retail etc. The market has been flooded with illegals and TFW's who can barely speak English. Yet who helped them get into these positions instead of deporting their asses back to their original homelands?

And even when these kids do apply for these jobs, they're basically forced to compete against slave-tier wages. Since if they complain, they get quickly replaced with some third worlder who will do it for free instead.

[–]Ponderer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

That's a fair point.

Why do you think the boomers collectively became this way?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

IMO, I don't think they became it. They were always like this.

Apartheid South Africa, Rhodesia & Portuguese Angola/Mozambique had all existed in their youths, and yet all 3 of these countries were completely shat on by the entire world. Boomers were happy to boycott these countries to death and label them "racist", yet they never targeted Israel with the same campaigns.

They had a chance to redeem themselves, especially after Africa's decolonization proved to be a complete failure when the last White man left. Yet we saw the complete opposite. Boomer presidents like George Bush II pushed the No Child Left Behind Act, which was just widespread denial of race & IQ research that existed everywhere back then. They also oversaw the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq & Libya, which ended up creating more refugee crises, but they saw it good for their businesses because they would hire them for slave-tier wages.

[–]Ponderer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

IMO, I don't think they became it. They were always like this.

There must be some explanation. Genetics? Chemicals in the water? Some kind of generational curse?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

They were just arrogant.

We had scientists like Charles Murray, Richard Herrnstein, J. Philippe Rushton or Arthur Jensen working around the clock to present proof of Race & IQ differences, and yet they were never given a chance to defend themselves when put in front of an audience made of Boomers.

Maybe it is just a generational curse, but I still believe they are accountable for their actions. Again, compare how the Whites living in Africa were treated, compared to the Israelis occupying Palestine? Only the White Africans got called racist and were banned from going to the same Olympic Games as everyone else, but nobody cared that Israel was doing worse stuff back then. Or look at China? They are very ethnonationalist yet Boomers were happy to outsource manufacturing to them.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A White African is an oxymoron.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

South Africa was empty when the Dutch settled it. They actually have stronger claims to the land than the Black Bantus who immigrated much later.

Rhodesia and the Portuguese Colonies were won by conquest, and the Whites who settled there had already built civilization. And the Africans were already killing each other for territory, how come it's bad when another group does the same thing but better?

It's like the same hypocritical arguments used against Europeans for arriving in America. Liberals always say "diversity is a strength". Ok, the Europeans "enriched" the Indians by living next to them. But then it turned to war, and the Indians lost. If the Europeans never did this, than another Indian tribe like the Aztecs would have moved North and done the same thing.

[–]Ponderer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Maybe, but I'm still of the opinion that boomers were socially manipulated, rather than the root cause being in themselves somehow.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The problem with the "manipulated" angle is if you do try and talk to them, they don't actually show any remorse for their views. Even when evidence is presence.

It's like how I made this thread the other day about this guy in the video asking a very innocent question.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPHPcDv409c

If the Boomers were serious about being opened minded, they would ask more questions about who tricked them, instead of literally demanding the man to leave the building.

Boomers have always treated the subject of race with extreme taboo. We never see any dissenting views from either side. Both liberal and conservative politicians fully maintain that diversity is without any flaws, and immigration has no negatives. If anyone tries to tell them otherwise, or even explain how certain failures are tied to genes and not environment, they're immediately kicked from out of the party.

[–]Ponderer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

My stance is that if it's not nurture, then it must be nature. And I don't see a natural explanation for how they ended up like that.

At least, not one that's completely disconnected from nurture.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Charles Murray, Richard Herrnstein, J. Philippe Rushton or Arthur Jensen

Except the TV said those guys were wrong. The TV would never lie.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They were technically on TV and allowed to debate their points. I posted some clips of this during the past week, like this one of Jared on Donahue's show, but there are more out there:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49gp3NLWkVU&list=WL&index=299

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeEFjr1pfaY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdG2rJoE2pg

It should be interesting to note, even though there were a lot of hecklers, some people in the audience did defend or acknowledged the people in the videos were right. For example, there was a Florida woman who called in and complained about the amount of illegal immigrants in her child's school and how it made her classrooms more difficult to get along (because they spoke spanish). The 1990s and the early 2000s definitely felt like the last time race realism could be taken serious by the public, but 9/11 came and completely shifted the focus to the Middle East, unfortunately.

When the 2010s came around, we also saw big tech censorship finally kicked in and removed influential groups like American Renaissance or Red Ice from youtube and twitter, which affected who they could reach.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The first cradle to grave Television generation.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm so sick of this "Boomers did this!!!". It's stupid.

The hate is justified.

Boomers grew up opposing authority. So when the old guard finally died, what did they do? They became the new authority, but even worse.

Now we just saw the end of a pointless 20 year war, where more muslims are demanding access to White countries, while Boomers hold the gates up for them. Want proof? Boomers are the ones firing employees and replacing them with refugees under the excuse of "labor shortages".

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/nova-scotia-long-term-care-refugees-staff-1.6115437

If anything, this should be a lesson for the younger generation to never worship their parents. Because after they're dead and gone, they'll never face the consequences of what a white-minority country now looks like.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think you're confusing oligarchs with "Boomers".

If you think everyone aged 65-85 is somehow all for the browning of America you're not reading the polls. They are the LEAST likely to support these things.

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The anti-boomer program is jewish propaganda to divert attention.

Oy vey, goy, it's the boomers, not us...

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I refuse to believe it after seeing contradicting statements in real life.

For example, look at the Farm Industry. The average age of of these people are 55 ~ 59 years old. At least in my country (Canada)

https://farmworktofeedcanada.ca/the-next-generation-of-canadian-farmers/

Yet where did all these illegals and TFW's show up that made farm work completly inaccessible because the owners refuse to pay more than minimum wage?

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/45-28-0001/2020001/article/00002-eng.htm

And that's just one industry. The fast food industry is also notorious for going the TFW route as well. There was a big scandal a few years back where these restaurants are so cheap, they literally hid these foreign workers under their basements to live.

https://financialpost.com/news/retail-marketing/foreign-workers-sleeping-in-burger-king-basement-alberta-health-services

Ask any Boomer and they know this stuff was always going on, but debate them on actually removing this shitty practice and they'll give you an earful of "you're just being lazy" or "you just hate competition" even though the ceiling for this type of work is being a complete slave for corporations.

In principle, they might not supporting the browning, but their words don't speak louder than their actions. They accepted the cheap third world labor without question. The same applies with all the outsourcing that went to places like China & India. Why wasn't their a bigger push to produce local instead?

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As I said oligarchs, the employer class, not the workers. Most people don't own large farms or even restaurants, they are employees. Unions, guilds and the like are the natural response. In other words, people are against monopolies, unless they ARE a monopoly. Employers think of citizens as monopolists, i.e. they have sole supply of workers. Oligarchs think pesky citizens are monopolizing the labor market.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

"Boomers" were teenagers when Hart-Celler passed

You mean the same teenagers who were rioting all over the West for negro rights?

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Were they? Wasn't it blacks themselves who were doing that? What riots were there in the UK or Benelux?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Have you forgotten about the riots of the 1960s?

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Alot done by Blacks?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And white students.

[–]Salos60000Pragmatic European Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really no, it was primarily blacks.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You mean the same teenagers who were rioting all over the West for negro rights?

No, completely different aged people.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pay-as-you-go retirement systems are ponzi scams and they always go bankrupt.

The only sustainable retirement system is based on savings.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing new. They have been projecting this for years. By 2030 they project that there will only be 3 working age adults per retiree. Not working adults, working age adults.