you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It means new and different and is often used in a derogatory way when it comes to politics, a way to imply that the new version is an inferior bastardized version of the original.

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Can you give an example?

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Neo liberal or Neo marxist, very few would ever identify as neo liberal or neo marxist.

[–]NeoRail 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do not think either of those are valid examples that demonstrate your point. At the very least, it is clear that they refer to similar ideas, not to different ones. Neoliberalism truly takes after the spirit of liberalism, rather than that of the social democracy which came after it. Neo-Marxism, despite being a purely polemical term, also aims to establish a Marxist continuity. If the term "neo-feudalism" should be considered to be of the same type as these two, then it is a misnomer.