What do you think National Socialism got wrong?

submitted by [deleted] from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not an expert on the subject, but the obvious elephant in the room is what it resulted in. A genocide of the German people with 10 to 13 million of mostly able bodied younger people killed and some absurd number of German women raped by maurading Soviet troops. Germany and much of Europe left in utter ruins, with Germany divided and occupied by hostile forces and subjected to a multi generational propaganda campaign of self hatred and guilt(which has since been expanded to all Europeans) that has culminated in the west being offered up as an international refugee center for the most dysfunctional, hostile and opportunistic people on the planet.

Thanks to ww2, Jews became more powerful than they ever had been, or ever could have been. That is the lasting legacy of National Socialism, and Jews continue to mine it and ww2 in order to increase and consolidate their power and silence any and all opposition. So yeah, regardless of its theoretical merits or flaws, in practical terms it was a catastrophic failure of epic proportions. It laid the foundation for nearly all modern day organized Jewish anti-white propaganda and censorship.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I don't know. Create a new one. Come up with novel ideas to deal with unprecedented events and situations such as the one we currently find ourselves in. Learn from history, but never use it as a template. I'm generally not big on cure all ideologies and gurus. In general, systems are only as good as the people utilizing them, hence what matters are the people themselves, not some rigid formula they follow.

    I think it's important to maintain a firm moral foundation without the baggage of previous atrocities and decades of ingrained propaganda. Virtue matters to Europeans, hence virtue signalling is used as a potent weapon by people who hate Europeans. That doesn't mean that idealism is inherently bad, only that it can be perverted by hostile people in power, as is most definitely the case now.

    If your ideology is based on might makes right, you will wind up with people who will run when faced with long odds. I get so annoyed at all this talk of black pills and white pills. Who gives a shit. If you are standing for what's right that is all that matters. The odds of winning and losing can change continually. The darkest times are right before the dawn as they say. In 1987 no one imagined the Soviet Union would collapse just a few years later so outward appearances can be deceptive.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    In the 21st century only a system based on direct democracy can function. And thanks to technology, it can attain levels of perfection that were unimaginable. Imagine electoral promises recorded in a blockchain, and then the votes. Accountability.

    But for such a system to work well, power must be distributed as locally as possible. Avoiding centralization also largely avoids corruption.

    It's a system, not an ideology, because ideologies cannot function anymore, not with the "richness" of diversity we have in most nations. But you would find neighborhoods and towns with impressive ethnic concentrations, and the direct democracy would allow a people to make as many rules as makes sense, for themselves, within the greater framework.

    So in a sense, it's a system that allows for ideologies, to each (group) their own.