you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Lugger 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I mean in terms of general philosophy...

The most important thing? Excessive expansionist tendencies.

The Nazis, ever since they took power in the 1930s, were building up the military and preparing the German people for a bloody war were going to wage to secure Germany as Europe's dominant power and conquer large areas of land (especially Slavic land) for colonization. We all know how their stupid war turned out — the Nazi asses kicked, Europe devastaded and tens of millions of Europeans dead.

I once mentioned that if the Natzees had dropped their retard-tier warlike plans and focused entirely on making Germany as prosperous as possible, they would have gone down in history as wise and capable rulers, but, since pretty much entire Nazi Germany's economy revolved around building stuff for the upcoming war (factories, vehicles, railroads etc.), I'm not sure they would have even managed to improve German economy by not war-centered ways.

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The Nazis, ever since they took power in the 1930s, were building up the military and preparing the German people for a bloody war

You don't seem to realise what kind of restriction the Reichswehr was operating under, before it became the Wehrmacht. The Treaty of Versailles limited them to an army of just 100,000 men, with no heavy artillery, no tanks, no aircraft, and a navy of just 15,000 men, with no more than 6 capital ships, 6 cruisers, 12 destroyers, and no submarines. As a result of these restrictions, the Reichswehr was little more than a glorified police force when compared to the militarys of the rest of Europe. By the time the Nazis came into power, the need for re-armament was a foregone conclusion.

but, since pretty much entire Nazi Germany's economy revolved around building stuff for the upcoming war (factories, vehicles, railroads etc.)

This is a myth. Historians (most of them Jewish) have often lied through their teeth about how the Nazis achieved their economic recovery from the great depression. They did not pursue re-armament at the expense of social welfare. The Nazis pursued a policy of both guns and butter.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a myth. Historians (most of them Jewish) have often lied through their teeth about how the Nazis achieved their economic recovery from the great depression. They did not pursue re-armament at the expense of social welfare. The Nazis pursued a policy of both guns and butter.

Absolutely factual. The Jews aren't going to say "The German economic miracle of the 1930s was achieved first and foremost by limiting the Jewish influence on the economy." That's just... Too much truth.