all 14 comments

[–]NeoRail 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Personally, I think that these are some qualities which every leader of a dissident movement would need:

  • Moral character. A man without character is impossible to trust.

  • A deeply principled and well thought out worldview.

  • Strategic vision. This means knowing what objective is being pursued, what actions can be undertaken to achieve this objective, as well as knowing how and why these actions help with achieving the objective.

  • Organisational skill and dedication. These qualities are the practical complement to strategic vision.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Moral character. A man without character is impossible to trust.

This is EXTREMELY important. Generally if this is met, a lot of other issues are solved simply by virtue of morality coming in the way of treachery and powermongering.

[–]TheJamesRocket 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Successful leaders need a balance of soft and hard skills. Soft skills are his charisma, his communication skills, his oratory skills, etc. Hard skills are his ability to analyse situations, to take the initiative, to make tough decisions, etc.

Some leaders have an abundance of soft skills, but no hard skills at all. They would be very good at inspiring people and creating a movement, but would be terrible at actually solving political problems. Donald Trump was an example of this.

Ideally, you would want a more balanced leader with a combination of hard and soft skills, like Adolph Hitler, or Vladimir Putin.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well explained. I think Hitler was mainly held back by some of his poorly chosen inner circle, and Putin by the poor state of his country and his alliances with plutocrats. Those details aside, both embody precisely the kind of people we need.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think we need a leader that excels at street level logistical organization and 'screening' the right people into trusted positions. I wish that Patrick Little would have paced himself more instead of blowing his load and sanity on a senate run in California. Guys like Eric Striker, Patrick Little and with a lot more work Nick Fuentes are all a partial blue print for an alt right leader. Ideally though we are going to eventually need a public version of Bronze age Pervert to really get the ball rolling. Someone that speaks about art and masculinity and sacrifice and tradition. That's what's going to get people really out in the street. In fact someone just wrote an article recently about BAP as the ideal leader and BAP even covered some things about leadership in his most recent podcast (#84 I think?).

[–]88BitSorelianism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I think a lot of those guys you mentioned are more akin to journalists and political pundits than leaders of anything. And Patrick little was a complete retard who was literally brain damaged and couldn't remember anything, maybe it's time or maybe people weren't really paying attention back then but I really don't understand where this almost nostalgia or maybe wishing he was still around comes from.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And Patrick little was a complete retard who was literally brain damaged and couldn't remember anything,

That's the general consensus by a LOT of alt right people and I just totally disagree. He was one of the most action oriented people we had. Action is way more important. Nobody can explain to me what made him 'retarded'. He went around saying everything right. Naming the Jew. Stomping on Israeli flags. Dude was based as fuck and if we had more like him we would have been in a lot better position.

[–]88BitSorelianism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You probably fall more into the wasn't paying attention back then crowd, some of the last streams he did he was drunk off his ass and trying to doxx people he used to work with and was friends with at one time, but couldn't because he couldn't remember their name because of his brain injury. Idk maybe bragging about losing your virginity to your black maid doesn't make him a retard to you, but it does to me.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In my perfect world, the best leaders are those with actual military experience.

In fact, a general in many ways, holds the uttermost power in all of society.

-They are tasked with winning wars, and defeating the enemy at all costs

-They are master tacticians and strategists. Drafting plans and blueprints that nobody else could see coming.

-They are heavily supportive of science, and commission new high tech weapons to stay one step ahead of the pack.

-They prove the natural hierarchy system right. Nobody of a lower rank is allowed to overrule the general. Thus, obedience is to be expected.

-They are involved with nation building, as well as occupying enemy territory and telling the population what to do.

It's hard to get a better offering than this. Although there's a risk that the military could just seize all power and declare a dictatorship. But compared to current democracy, that might still be a blessing.

[–]peaceful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone who can rally the altright towards lots of full time activism at waking whites. A leader can't wake whites without a television presence, so he needs to get his followers to do it.

[–]FrenologistSaving the World 1 Cranial Exam at a Time 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Leto II and the Golden Path.

[–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hitler a successful leader? He was a tyrant to his own people who from 1941 committed a long series of blunders that doomed Germany. While Churchill and friends are no less repugnant to Mez as they are indeed likely more repugnant t to me, anyone who knows anything about the German perspective of ww2 knows Hitler was a moral and military failure.

Conversely, Franco successfully won the Spanish war, stopped the communist leftist tables and modernized Spain....

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Franco was opportunistic and abandoned Fascism/Falangism after it became inconvenient. Hitler made harmful choices yes, but much of that was out of desperation and having some untrustworthy and moronic characters advising him and politically maneuvering around him.

[–]Richard_Parker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Read Tapping Hitlers Generals, or Mansteins Memoirs, or so many others...