This. Also, 'Russophobia' is socially acceptable because Russians are predominantly White. Positing that Russia is the 'greatest threat' to America fits perfectly into the predominant anti-White and 'anti-racist' narratives (Whites are the real problem, non-whites are not the real problem) while positing, say, China, would not. Leftoids cannot accept China as an enemy because they would automatically be in the position of 'racist White supremacist oppressors' against 'non-white victims'. So any scapegoat of theirs must be White, and indeed they all predominantly are. 'Police', 'Russians', 'Republicans', 'Trump supporters', 'neo-Nazis', etc. Notice how not a single one of their enemies is predominantly non-white, despite Whites being < 10% of the global population? What's the chance of that being the result of impartial minds? Around about zero?

Furthermore, it means that the two 'White powers' (supposedly a term used by Brezhnev to Nixon) oppose each other, which again serves the anti-White narrative in a very obvious way. Afrocentrists, 'Critical Race Theorists', J's, and other people who are ardently anti-White salivate at the prospect of Whites killing each other over some delusion like the Russiagate false narrative, one so obviously hokum in light of the fact that Trump would have long been jailed if any conclusive proof was found. The fact that he's not jailed means that they never found proof despite the obsessive search by these Comey, Mueller and Sztrok types who the Democrats deified for a time, because they wrongly thought that these men would be the key to finding the conclusive proof they wanted to rid America of Trump. Of course, if they had conclusive proof he would have been in jail long ago—the reason why he hasn't been jailed is because they haven't been able to provide it.

Nonetheless, plenty of Democrat trash were sabre-rattling with Russia at the time because war with Russia is something they already find unconsciously desirable (the two most powerful groups of Whites killing each other strengthens non-white power and gets the world closer to having a 'racial equality' that, unknown to them, has already been long surpassed). Democrat Whites obviously think they hold way more cards than they actually do, and so bizarrely think that they are the beneficiaries of racial inequality when it has obviously been the non-whites who have held the upper hand for well over 50 years. For example, many of these people won't even call the police if a non-white commits a crime against them, because they either justify the crime (he's just desperate, oppressed, underprivileged, etc.) or because they know deep inside that they are going to be the 'bad guy' for doing so. Neither of these things would be true in any White supremacist society (nobody would attempt to justify non-white crime, non-whites would never be the 'good guy' in conflicts with Whites).

Spot on about leftoids and the media. All of the unthinking lumpen trash automatically become Leftists because it is the only narrative to which they are exposed. To become a Leftist one just has to internalize everything transmitted to them by the MSM, whereas to shift to our side it takes one to explicitly reject the content of these largely unavoidable transmissions. That's far too difficult for most people, who prefer others to think for them so that they can indulge in hedonism, etc. The West is one massive echo chamber in which one is bombarded constantly with the same general messages—from television, internet, teachers, role models, celebrities, public intellectuals, all the way from childhood to the grave—to the point that they seem to most people objective, unquestionable truths.