you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So whites having power but using it in a way you disagree with means whites don't have power? Do you realize how stupid that sounds?

[–]AidsVictim69 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Elite (those of the capital or highly credentialed bourgeoise classes) whites have power, just like elite blacks or Jews do. This means nothing for the average white in terms of having power within society, elite whites are mostly anti white (for whites outside their class), no power is transferred to some white group socio-political body.

[–]AcceleratedWallops 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why do you focus on whites? This is true of all elites and all average people, of all races. If your issue is class warfare you don't need to factor race into it at all.

[–]AidsVictim69 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Race cannot be separated from the material and social conditions of society. It's simultaneously true that the average white is affected by both their class and race, the latter being part of their "material conditions" (literally their genetics) as much as class is. The idea that everything must be viewed either through a purely class lens or otherwise be a false consciousness propagated by the elite is a false dichotomy used by leftists as anti racial and ultimately contradictory anti materialist view.

I focus on whites because I am white, desire to live in a white society, and have multiple actors within society working against my individual and group interests as a white. Saying "race" doesn't matter no more affects the material reality of ones genetics than saying class doesn't matter affects the reality of ones material conditions.