all 10 comments

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]Tarrock 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Well, the blog is called "Early Life"

    [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yet somehow still a leftist -- and even some conservatives -- can look at you square in the face and honestly say 'Oh no one is targeting Whites. That's just a right wing conspiracy theory.'

    Whatever affect Whites have had on the climate we're also -- along with the NE Asians now -- the ones who are going to solve it. We're also not living with ridiculous amounts of overpopulation and would have stable or even declining population rates without mass immigration.

    Across social classes, the Western European ideal of “success” is based very much on extractive economies, materialism, and individualism

    As opposed to the the rest of the world which lives in perfect harmony with nature. This is where I can't blame climate skeptics because when you read stuff like this and intellectuals try to smuggle in a hefty slice of Rousseauean fantasy on the back of their scientific theory people have a right to be wary.

    BTW when did 'individualism' become a point of ridicule for environmentalists? That's an interesting one. Got to say I agree with them on that one and if there's one good thing the 'climate justice' movement can achieve it's making Western whites less individualistic.

    A recent study, for example, found that Asian, Black, and Hispanic Americans breathe more polluted air than white people do — which is by design.

    Genuine blood libel there. I'm so disgusted by these types of accusations.

    [–]Erasmus 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    What a surprise that a member of our favorite tribe hates white people.

    The real danger is European people being browbeaten and manipulated by those passing as White into not following where our spirit naturally leads.

    If you look back to the late 1960s, when NASA was contemplating the future after the Apollo moon landings, they were already putting the finishing touches on a grand vision for a space-based economy that would transform the planet, using lunar- and space-based power.

    In a nutshell, the 1970s were to be about building lunar bases; the 1980s, lunar solar panel factories; and the 1990s, beaming space and lunar solar power back to Earth in the form of low-power radio waves, capable of passing through cloud cover and being rectified back into electricity by low-tech rectenna farms anywhere on Earth.

    This would've meant essentially limitless energy, anywhere on the planet, with no emissions whatsoever, 24 hours a day. No more reliance on fossil fuels. No more oil spills. No more pollution from coal smokestacks, and the cancers it causes. Even the threat of anthropogenic global warming eliminated. It was all there for the taking. The studies were done, the reference plans had been made.

    But instead, the Jewish-run media shamed white people into abandoning manned space exploration. They demonized White America for the degraded state of American blacks. They damned any investment in space as an immoral waste of money. And we listened. To the detriment of everyone on Earth.

    Even now, they're still doing the same thing. Here Eve Andrews demonizes billionaires like Elon Musk who have found a new path forward, and demands that Whites instead go back to "tearing down those unjust systems and constructing something more equitable in their place."

    If she truly wants to see the face of the people who have ruined the planet? She should look in a mirror. Listening to people like her has cost the world more than we can ever know.

    [–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    European people being browbeaten and manipulated

    This is an example of an all too common defect, imo.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Why don't non-white people get rid of civilization now that they are free of colonizing influence? Why do they rush towards civilization? Why don't they fix racism problems themselves, why do they rely on whitey to fix it for them?

    These questions are of course silly, because article is simply jewish attack on white people.

    Sure, (post-)industrial technology is obviously too complex for society and we can't handle it (white people too), but it also can't be ignored that Europe and America didn't suffer as big of an environmental impact as non-white countries, even though we were/are far more technolologically developed.

    I would agree with headline, but article is just jewess viciously attacking white people.

    [–]CircumsteinRabbi Circumstein 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    How do people like this reconcile their flagrantly anti-White, conspiratorial views with the obvious reality that Green movements barely exist outside of White countries? Even Israel, despite having plenty of crazy leftists, has no significant Green party. Meanwhile, the "racists" in Germany have a Green party that is very close to power and the "racists" in France have a Green party replacing the older Red Left. Who is this ignorant moron trying to fool?

    The claim that pollution-generating structures are maliciously placed near non-whites is one of the most bizarrely "racist" and conspiratorial things I've read yet. Does anyone seriously think that when Bezos and friends are deciding where to expand their businesses, that they intentionally look for the most non-white places available just so that they can have a laugh about how they're polluting the environments inhabited by the blacks and browns? What a howler. Bezos, who gave millions to BLM and who claimed that anyone who does not support BLM is not a welcome customer? Gates, who wants to give all his money to Africa when he dies? If anything, they just set up shop around non-whites because it's cheaper. To claim they're maliciously conspiring to harm non-whites through pollution is truly a demented combination of anti-White and Communist-style anti-capitalist baseless speculation. This is the kind of nonsense the Hutus made up about the Tutsis in the years leading up to the Rwandan Genocide.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Lol! She literally looks like a caricature from Der Stürmer.

    [–]cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This has always been an anti-white narrative. Only people smart enough to care about the environment are the ones who pay attention to articles like these. The birth rate in Niger is like 7. Whites aren't even at replacement (2)

    I have friends who have touted the "bad for the environment" argument as to why they don't want kids. I'm always at the point of bringing up African birth rates and IQ, and saying "Given all this, what are the weighted odds of your child having a marginally bad impact on the environment, vs they themselves solving the environment problem?"

    I know better. Instead, I just say "our population is increasing either way, at least don't make this a reason" or "maybe your kids would solve the environment problem"

    God I hate this Jewish/leftist hell

    [–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    [–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    All people are bad for the environment but if you look close white areas are never democrat darkie shit holes.