top 100 commentsshow all 123

[–]TheJamesRocket 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (39 children)

Theres only one word to describe whats happening in America: White genocide.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

And the shocking part is how many people are gleefully going along with it.

In evolutionary biology, when an organism appears to be acting against its own genetic interests, we may safely assume that it has probably fallen under the control of some other entity, typically a parasite, which has hijacked the host and is directing its activities toward different ends. Ron Unz

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Thats exactly it: Our society has been hijacked by parasites intent on sucking us dry. They have convinced huge swaths of the population to hate themselves and their ancestors, and to happily accept their own disenfranchisement and replacement. If we survive this conflict and come out on top, then we urgently need to find out how such brainwashing was able to succeed. John Derbyshire put it best:

''For the future of our civilization, I would like to see a task force—a Manhattan Project—of historians, psychiatrists, neurologists, behavioral geneticists, quantitative psychologists, sociologists, and anthropologists get to work explaining this strange, weird, suicidal phenomenon.''

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's easy: Jews.

[–]JollyRunstride 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

I did my comment before I saw your reference to parasitism, but I am super wary liking anyone's post here on Saidit because everyone here is focused on the "poor me" divisive narrative rather than trying to get humanity back together(oh yeah, then I saw your "white genocide" post, lol you're a fucking racist). "white genocide" is the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read in my life. It is genocide in general. you are not the victim, we all are. Cultural differences not withstanding, If a person is not your brother because of their race than you are literally the fucking problem.

[–]Node 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

lol you're a fucking racist i'm incapable of apprehending reality.

You have to be pretty stupid to not be racist.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(oh yeah, then I saw your "white genocide" post, lol you're a fucking racist)

You're posting on a race realism sub.

If a person is not your brother because of their race than you are literally the fucking problem.

What race are you? What is your response when other groups refuse to endorse your egalitarianism and race blind stances? How will you defend yourself if the western empire collapses and we move back into classical racial and tribal government structures?

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You make some really great points. /s

[–]Noam_Chomsky 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Theres only one word to describe whats happening in America: White genocide.

I haven't read the article, but I wouldn't be surprised if they redefined the definition of "white".

Similar to the redefining of the definition of "pandemic", by removing the deadly aspects. Now it's an illness that many people could get.

Similarly, the definition of "genocide" seems to have been hijacked.

[–]JollyRunstride 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

this is the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read. It is genocide in general. Stop feeling bad for yourself and being so selfish. Humanity at large is at stake. You are, currently, being a parasitical force sucking the life from your fellow humans. and also...that's two words.

[–]Node 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

this is the dumbest fucking thing I have ever read.

Wait, you don't read your own comments?

[–]peaceful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is not genocide in general, only white countries have massive immigration and forced assimilation.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

Search:

genocide definition

"Whites" are not deliberately killed in this process.

[–]outrageousboote 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Article I The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article II In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:(a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Clown, genocide doesn't have to mean round up and murder.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

No need for name-calling, outrageousboote.

Read again the definition and note this:

acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such

Non-whites aren't thinking while having sex that: "yeah baby, this will help kill off those honkies!"

(Nor are non-whites actively trying to "to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group")

[–]outrageousboote 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The system is trying to decrease white status and population, the average nonwhite is not fond of honkies but i'm not talking about the spic, chink or nig down the street.

[–]JollyRunstride 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

oh yeah those "chinks" and "nigs" are barley human beings! We whites obviously deserve to be On Top with the highest status!

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'd be fine with freedom of association but such a concept is totally incomprehensible to most non white groups.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

No

(If you have a reliable source that discusses the developments of societies, do mention it. Or consider Popper's 'Open Society and its Enemies', or Arendt's 'The Origins of Totalitarianism', or more generally, Macintyre's 'After Virtue'.)

[–]outrageousboote 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Absolutely yes, whites aren't allowed to self-segregate, have freedom of association or expression or act in their own racial interests. Meanwhile coloreds are allowed to do these things.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is an interesting point.

But I do think whites self-segregate quite often.

Perhaps you are referring to legal requirements for hiring practices, which can limit the hiring of whites, in favor of non-whites. This is sometimes appropriately called 'positive discrimination' or 'reverse discrimination', and can unjustly favor a poorly qualified person and reject a much better qualified person who happens to be white.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But certain Jews certainly want to make Caucasians a minority at all costs. Even Jennifer neocon Rubin admits it.

[–]skeech 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

socks: > Non-whites aren't thinking while having sex that: "yeah baby, this will help kill off those honkies!"

but you are so wrong, mr socks, because that is precisely the muslim agenda, to outnumber whites.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]peaceful 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Plan for White genocide that “anti-racists” implement:

-Flood ALL & ONLY white countries with millions of non-whites

·Create assimilation laws that restrict Whites from having any states, counties, cities, towns, villages, neighborhoods or schools to themselves

·Institute “diversity” policies to replace White kids in schools, universities, and employment

·Promote miscegenation & demonize those opposed to it

·Create “Hate Speech” laws that make it a criminal act for Whites to object to their genocide

·Dehumanize White kids by telling them they’re a privileged “social construct” that are not worth preserving

·Demonize White history while canonizing the history of non-Whites

·Coverup the alarming number of violent crimes committed against Whites

·Silence, harass, insult, threaten, fire, demonize, or physically assault anyone who opposes these policies.

The only race going through this large scale global miscegenation experiment is Whites. There are massive pure isolated groups of every other major race that will be around long after Whites have been bred out of existence.

[–]Erasmus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Genocide is not the mass killing of people.

From the Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, quoting Lemkin:

Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aimed at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be a disintegration of political and social institutions—of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed at the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed at individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group (1944, p. 79).

The best word for this stage of the game is ethnocide, but ethnocide is simply a type of genocide.

https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/ethnocide

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Every element of genocide according to the UN definition of genocide is happening to white people. There's no way of denying it, you either support or oppose it.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Genocide is not the mass killing of people.

I didn't say it's limited to this (per my other responses to this).

[–]Erasmus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You are turning a blind eye to what you see happening all around you, and pretending it isn't.

Not just pretending, but telling others to pretend, as well.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Again - per my other comments - there is no genocide of white people. To say that this is a genocide is in its own way turning a blind eye to the reasons that non-hispanic whites have fewer kids. Follow the money, and elect politicians who will work for the 99% (majority white), rather than only for the 1%, who are developing a slave culture of the 99%.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All you do is ignore what's been explained to you because you're an anti White scumbag.

[–]Bagarmoossen 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Wow, this is much worse than expected. It's what you'd expect from a people undergoing an actual genocide. Maybe it will be easier to convince cuckservatives now that we have this morbid data at hand? It's a mass dieoff of apocalyptic proportions. America is now a well-oiled machine of killing and sterilizing white people, nothing else.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From what I remember, Boomers are the largest White voting bloc. If they die this decade, you can expect the number of White voters to cut in half.

Meanwhile, White children are already a minority in the USA. It's an attack that's coming from all angles.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/less-than-half-of-us-children-under-15-are-white-census-shows/

[–]peaceful 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe it will be easier to convince cuckservatives now

No way, conservatives are outwardly colorblind and therefore will welcome it.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not how the word conservative works.

[–]scormac1752 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

God help us.

Don't know about you guys, but I'm going on a date this weekend with a nice white girl and will hopefully make plenty of babies at some point in my future. If the West is going to die, it's not going down without a fight.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Good luck on your date. Remember the rules though: no talking about the JQ, Hitler or white genocide UNTIL THE FOURTH DATE.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He doesn't greet women with a roman salute

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

But we had 4 years of Trump, how could this be? /s

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm surprised anyone trusted him after Charlottesville. In fact, he warned the statues were coming down but did nothing to stop them.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Strange how this report came out on the 4-year anniversary of the event.

[–]Girondin 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

From the Washington post article about this

If the White decline is confirmed by the new data, that benchmark will have come about eight years earlier than previously projected, said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution.

“Twenty years ago if you told people this was going to be the case, they wouldn’t have believed you,” he said, adding that the opioid epidemic and lower-than-anticipated birthrates among millennials after the Great Recession accelerated the White population’s decline [no mention of immigration here?]

Also demographers have been saying on twitter (and also in the Washington post article) that non-whites are undercounted, not only is it unprecedented but it is low ball estimate, it is probably higher.

“The population estimates may not have accounted for recent immigration,” he said, noting the large influx of people into the country at the end of the 2000s.

reminder this was created, it wasn't and isn't a accident.

also raw numbers whites have dropped.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's estimated there are 29 million illegal immigrants. All of them refuse to leave.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“Twenty years ago if you told people this was going to be the case, they wouldn’t have believed you,” he said, adding that the opioid epidemic and lower-than-anticipated birthrates among millennials after the Great Recession accelerated the White population’s decline [no mention of immigration here?]

Total bullshit. The book "Camp Of The Saints" came out in 1973. People were already talking about demographics during and after the borders were opening to non whites in the United States and other European countries in the 1960s. Even in the 1920s, they were talking about the decline of white demographics in books like "The Rising Tide Of Color: The Threat Against White World Supremacy" by Lothrop Stoddard. Jews and leftists are lying out of their ass by acting like this was a unintentional, unforeseen consequence of political policies.

[–]Nasser 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Read a theory that White Californians deliberately refused to participate in the census in order to make California lose a house seat. Doubt the validity but if true then good move,maybe.

[–]IslamofascistDeath to America, Death to Israel, Death to The Ukraine 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Read a theory that White Californians deliberately refused to participate in the census in order to make California lose a house seat.

Cope. The fact is that your filthy country is dying.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Care to explain?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only person to use the word Islamofascist is Ron Unz or a dirty Zionist Jew.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Based move

[–]lokke767 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Whites" are now where "non-hispanic whites" were 10 years ago, at 61%. White people as we understand it are probably at 53-54%, if we're lucky we're still more than 40% of under-18s. Also "two or more races" has almost quadrupled in 10 years. It's at least 6% in every state except WV and Mississippi now. Lousiana is now as white as America as a whole.

Expect a parade of triumph by the whole jew media in the coming weeks.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

The only solution to the American problem is secession. Fortunately for white Americans, the US is a huge country with lots of land to carve out a new state. In Europe there is little land and the invaders are much worse.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

That's like retreating to a bedroom when squatters take over your house. Also, it won't be permitted.

[–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Retreating and regrouping is necessary at times in any war.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

In a war with tactical units and maximum-range weapons, sure. I don't see anything close to that being permitted while the US still exists.

Where in the US would that even be likely or desirable? How terrible would that place have to be for the US to approve of White Supremacists taking it over?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

At the risk of sounding trite we are already living in war. Most whites just don't know they are in one.

[–]peaceful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

for the US to approve of White Supremacists taking it over

That's an anti-white slur. Are Asians "supremacist" for having Asian countries or is it ONLY white people you are against?

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's the reality. Watch some current mainstream news. Make a note of who controls the US military, and most aspects of our society.

Do you think they would complain and marshal the forces for "some random people" all moving to the same area? No, all you would hear would be evil nazi white supremacists.

To paraphrase that demon acting as bidens mouthpiece, "no options would be off the table".

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The alternative is squatters taken over the entire house and everyone in your family goes insane and commits suicide. At least in a neo white ethnostate we can get back to rebuilding white birth rates and white culture. The non white areas will be ours again in a generation or two when they either die out from mismanagement or attempt to wage war on the white areas and get their shit conquered.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

At least in a neo white ethnostate we can...

Could, not can. Am I misreading this whole situation? What indication do you have that everyone behind the war on Whites would simply sit back and let that happen?

And really, what percentage of Whites would be willing to toss bullets at our enemies? Imo, the only way that could happen is after the collapse of the US. Then bigger problems would arise.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Absolutely this.

Arkansas should become the Republic of Arkansas, deport all of its undesirables, and then all of the other states should deport anyone who idenfities as a white supremacist to the Republic of Arkansas.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm fine with this. The minute any part of the country becomes a white ethnostate I will move there immediately and I don't care how bad the economy is or what type of reputation the lugenpresse has given it.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

Diversity is our greatest strength.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

Unironically, only when it's other Europeans.

America took in a lot of Germans, French, Italians, Dutch immigrants in the 20th century and became a superpower.

But taking in a lot of Africans, Indians, Hispanics is going to kill it.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Europeans don't count as diversity unless they are like those black africans in France or syrian mooslims. Diversity means less white people.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

There's absolutely nothing "centrist" about these comments.

Also: the US developed in the 17th - 19th century with a number of other ethnicities, without whom, it would not bave become a superpower.

[–]AidsVictim69 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Also: the US developed in the 17th - 19th century with a number of other ethnicities, without whom, it would not bave become a superpower.

Like? Black labor has been basically superfluous, native Americans were never part of the country in significant numbers nor contributed much to it, Jews had some inventions but were intellectually superfluous, what group would have stopped the US from becoming a superpower by their absence?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

An ethnic group is not "superfluous". I doubt we have much to discuss if you believe this.

What you note here is also ahistorical. Consider for example the 19th century immigrants.

Consider also the wealth of the US during the time of slave and immigrant labor in the 18th and 19th centuries. The processing of raw materials in the south and the industrial north made the US quite wealthy well before 1900. The US also manipulated Caribbean slave and indentured labour for raw sugar and other goods.

[–]peaceful 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If slavery made you wealthy Africa would be the wealthy because it's had lots of slavery.

Whites Did Not Benefit from Slavery (Not Even at the Time) https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/114/

[–]AidsVictim69 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What you note here is also ahistorical. Consider for example the 19th century immigrants.

The overwhelming majority of 19th century immigrants were white and I'm sure you know that's the context people here care about.

Consider also the wealth of the US during the time of slave and immigrant labor in the 18th and 19th centuries. The processing of raw materials in the south and the industrial north made the US quite wealthy well before 1900. The US also manipulated Caribbean slave and indentured labour for raw sugar and other goods.

Most of the capital accrued from slavery was destroyed in the civil war, at best you're talking about some fraction of that capital being invested in Northern industry. The US did not become a superpower because some of the mercantile and capitalist classes were making money off the Caribbean either. It became a superpower because of the massive industrial development in the later 19th and early 20th centuries (which was carried out overwhelmingly with white labour), technological development, and socially cohesive society that allowed it to act at a super national level.

In what way were non white ethnicities necessary for the US to become a super power? I see this idea often but it doesn't seem to be based on anything besides "White people made money off non whites" without showing in any substantive way that this majorly contributed to the kind of development necessary for "super power" status.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In what way were non white ethnicities necessary for the US to become a super power?

Thanks - though I have responded to this question elsewhere in the thread (and you can read my previous comments). North America has always been rather "mixed", and was especially mixed in the 17th-19th century. That mixed composition contributed to the successes of North Americans, and to the investments that developed then and thereafter.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Also: the US developed in the 17th - 19th century with a number of other ethnicities, without whom, it would not bave become a superpower.

20% of the USA was considered non-white back then. While these people made contributions, it was still the other 80% White people who ran all the institutions that made America wealthy, influential, powerful, or all three at once. Even if you take out a microscope and try to judge each American individually, you will still find it was White people who put the country on top.

John D Rockefeller, was not only the richest man, but his wealth was considered 3% of the entire GDP at the time. Show me a non-white American who comes close to that achievement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller

In the end it turned out that the individual segments of the company were worth more than the entire company was when it was one entity—the sum of the parts were worth more than the whole—as shares of these doubled and tripled in value in their early years. Consequently, Rockefeller became the country's first billionaire, with a fortune worth nearly 2% of the national economy.[5] His personal wealth was estimated in 1913 at $900 million, which was almost 3% of the US GDP of $39.1 billion that year.[6][full citation needed] That was his peak net worth, and amounts to US$423 billion (in 2020 dollars; inflation-adjusted).[7][8][b]

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

20% of the USA was considered non-white back then [17th - 19th centuries]

What is the source for this? The problem here is that a number of states were not part of the US until the early 20th century. Many of the minorities were also exploited for their labor during this period, adding to US wealth. This does not consider the Hispanic West, Native American plains, the Cherokee, Alaska, Hawaii, black slaves, Chinese labor, etc, etc. By 1800, there were only approximately 5 million non-hispanic whites in the US. By 1900, that number rose to 76 million. During the 17th century, and much of the 18th century, whites were a minority in North America. Perhaps if you consider the extent of the exploitation of cheap labor (of all ethnicities), you'll see that the US was developing as a superpower into the 19th century partially because of this exploitation. Who should get the credit? Everyone.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your own link says starting in the 1900s, the USA was at least 87.6% White, and it basically stayed like this up until the 1970s.

https://i.imgur.com/EkksTd4.png

Perhaps if you consider the extent of the exploitation of cheap labor (of all ethnicities), you'll see that the US was developing as a superpower into the 19th century partially because of this exploitation. Who should get the credit? Everyone.

Exploitation and cheap labor exist everywhere. Even before the USA came into existence, Africans & Native Americans were enslaving each other for free, yet how come they never built any cars, rocketships, or even a democratic government?

You don't get none of these things without the White Man. It's non-whites who should be saying "thank you" because for thousands of years, none of their societies ever got as advanced as Europe. And they still aren't.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

We're discussing 17th - to 19th centuries, not the 20th century.

We're also discussing contributions to making the US a superpower. Low wage earners and slaves contributed.

If you want former slaves to thank whites for their enslavement, you must know that that's completely nuts.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

We're discussing 17th - to 19th centuries, not the 20th century.

Ok, and it was still a White country or lead by them. America's very first law, specifically said only "free White person(s) ... of good character" were citizens. You don't get that if the contributions were all black or Indian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

We're also discussing contributions to making the US a superpower. Low wage earners and slaves contributed.

Does the burger flipper at Mcdonalds make more important decisions than the CEO? Responsibilities are not equally shared, and the same is true with race.

Doing grunt work is not as equal as managing the entire country or even making important decisions to win wars.

If you want former slaves to thank whites for their enslavement, you must know that that's completely nuts.

Do you got a counter argument? Slaves in Africa were actually eaten or sacrifcied to their tribal chiefs. And the ones who never got on the boat still live in poverty to this day, even when Europeans never ruled them.

Meanwhile, Blacks born in America today are given free money just for being alive. They get jobs, they get education, they can get anything they want because the government passed affirmative action for them. If they're not thankful for this, when all their homelands are stuck in an extreme violence and poverty loop, they're idiots.

By the way, it was a famous Black American boxer, Muhammad Ali, who said he's glad his parents came as slaves to America, instead of staying in the Congo. Especially since he visited the Congo and saw what black life was actually like.

https://quotepark.com/quotes/1761571-dinesh-dsouza-better-off-the-point-is-illustrated-by-the-great/

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So many fallacies here, I am not sure where to begin, or if I should bother.

The short answer is that we read all about the ways in which - historically - segregation, aparthied, racism, ethnostate proposals, white supremacy, and the rest of it, creates only discord, ruins societies, and just hasn't worked, in any scenario, if we look back 10 thousand years. To your points:

[17th-19th century North America, or what is now the US] Ok, and it was still a White country or lead by them.

No, it was not.

Responsibilities are not equally shared, and the same is true with race.

This is a class issue, and one can see that people with different skin colors are in the upper classes of many country, where they have major responsibities. The people who do the work for them are indeed contributing to their success - and as discussed - contributing to the US as a superpower.

Slaves in Africa were actually eaten or sacrifcied to their tribal chiefs....

This and other points about howgrateful former slaves should be are false and take the information out of context. Imperial developments shifted the power dynamic in the southern hemisphere, so that there was human trafficking, while also other debts to countries in northern hemispheres. Western bellicosity severely reduced the quality of life for many in the empires. But the color of skin of the victors in these early modern exchanges varied broadly - especially around the Mediterranean and toward the south and east. Human trafficing was popular in central asia, across the globe, and around Africa.

I doubt any of this will be appreciated, but I hope it helps. This merely scratches the surface of the necessary explanations in answer to the points you've made.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The short answer is that we read all about the ways in which - historically - segregation, aparthied, racism, ethnostate proposals, white supremacy, and the rest of it, creates only discord, ruins societies, and just hasn't worked,

In comparison to multicultural societies, which has never once achieved equality anywhere on this earth, and attempts at implementing it is nothing but a giant money sink?

Segregation, apartheid and ethnostates have worked. Their goal is to either keep races separate, or acknowledge major differences exist that's at least biological in origin. How this somehow "creates discord" or "ruins societies" demands an explanation. For example, in the case of Apartheid, I would rather blame Blacks for choosing to move to a racist country and be subjected to its cruel punishments, when 99% of the rest of the continent never had Apartheid but quality of life was far worse than them.

No, it was not.

So George Washington is no longer White? Abraham Lincoln too? Is he now a black guy?

I'm not trying to be a dick but this feels like history being rewritten. And it seems funny that you didn't respond to my Naturalization Act. Which race wrote the first law that said citizenship was only meant for free white people? WHY would they create such a law to begin with, if they thought America was suppose to be for everyone? Spoiler: They didn't.

This is a class issue, and one can see that people with different skin colors are in the upper classes of many country, where they have major responsibities. The people who do the work for them are indeed contributing to their success - and as discussed - contributing to the US as a superpower.

They're not contributing as much as the people responsible for the success of the nation as a whole. Burger flippers didn't build the Mcdonalds or come up with the prices to sell food to the masses. They literally do basic grunt work of putting meat on a bun and handing to customers. A CEO's worth and value goes beyond physical labor. It takes a level of genius and intellect to read the market and keep a multi-billion company afloat, every single day.

America is just like that. All the low tier physical labor class are just following orders that the smarter and upper class managers tell them to do. When industrialization came along, the physical labor class actually became less irrelevant, because machines could do it better and more efficiently.

This and other points about howgrateful former slaves should be are false and take the information out of context. Imperial developments shifted the power dynamic in the southern hemisphere, so that there was human trafficking, while also other debts to countries in northern hemispheres. Western bellicosity severely reduced the quality of life for many in the empires. But the color of skin of the victors in these early modern exchanges varied broadly - especially around the Mediterranean and toward the south and east. Human trafficing was popular in central asia, across the globe, and around Africa.

And there was human trafficking in Europe as well. Arabs ran their own slave trade and raided Europe looking for human livestock. Yet why isn't Europe a shithole today? The "racism" excuses just don't hold up in the face of logic. If former slaves don't want to feel grateful they grew up in America, then they can pack their bags and head straight back to Africa where they came from. But they refuse to do that.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Brazil is looking pretty good compared to the US right now. In Brazil if a nog tries to rob your house and you shoot him, no one will bother you. The cops are like, yeah, good job, less work for us. In America, the Jewish/AWFL district attorney will indict you on murder and a Jewish/AWFL judge will sentenct you to 20 years in jail.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Brazil has other issues though.

[–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is this with a proper sorting of Hispanics or not?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes.

The 2020 Census used two separate questions to calculate race and ethnicity. One question focused on Hispanic or Latino origin. The other question focused specifically on race. “The improvements and changes enable a more thorough and accurate depiction of how people self-identify, yielding a more accurate portrait of how people report their Hispanic origin and race within the context of a two-question format,” said Jones.

They also made changes to the Arabs as well. So they can identify as Egyptian, Lebanese etc.

[–]Nombre27 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That's probably why the drop was so big, finally being (more) honest about the data.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In hindsight, maybe they should have kept it.

When Whites become a minority, there wont be any support programs for them now. Like how Blacks, Jews and Asians are a protected class.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

With the White suicide rate being higher than the actual white birth rate

Is that true?

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Edit: I should update it. White deaths [in general] are higher than white births.

https://i.imgur.com/C69v0H8.jpg

[–]JollyRunstride 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

just not sure how "america" is "our own country". like, seriously? by not a single definition of "america" is it a "white person country", right? like not in the constitution(although, kind of), or in any aspect of its history. are you just afraid of losing the only thing you've ever had, being a sense of pride in an arbitrary place of birth? if you were born in south africa would you be worried about loosing that too? we all need to be way less focused on "white" or "not white" and WAY WAY more focused on Humanity and life and love for all people and beings on Earth. When you get caught up in "us" or "them" you are falling for Their(irony) trick. Seriously. Don't worry about "america" becoming less "white" because that is not the real issue here. The real issue is Life vs. parasitism.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Every non-White country [that isn't ran by East Asians] is a total failure.

It's harsh but it's true. Civilization was basically an invention by White people, and for thousands of years, they're the only race who managed to perfect it. Getting rid of the original inventors, or slashing their numbers, is the exact same as returning back to Caveman life.

So yes, Race does matter a lot for this. If you enjoy using the internet, or driving cars, or even waking up in a safe neighborhood, those things are all going to be ripped away once non-whites take control of the government and run it into the ground.

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a reddit troll that's literally against 'racism'.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

by not a single definition of "america" is it a "white person country", right?

Oh, I don't know. How about the first immigration act saying you had to be a "free white person of good character".

pride in an arbitrary place of birth

No idiot, in the society we built.

we all need to be way less focused on "white" or "not white"

Who is "we all"?

The real issue is Life vs. parasitism

The real issue for me is Whites vs. parasitism

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The real issue is Life vs. parasitism.

Based anti-semite. Now instead of trying to deradicalise people, switch to radicalising them against parasitism. People will like you much more when you're not being a faggot.

[–]Fonched 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope change will be on the way in the future. At this point however, people are still likely to label it as a "Great Replacement/White Genocide Conspiracy theory" as people do not believe this demographic change is deliberately inflicted against Whites and not considered to be as painful as other atrocities ("nice version of genocide" for instance). Those claims include how non-Whites choose White nations on their own as it is the best for them to escape oppression and live quality lives, while Whites just are not simply interested in doing the reverse; plot-wise, I've seen people just not believe that everyone in power is conspiring and having resentment for Whites ("10 people can't decide where to eat out").

Seeing the response on the left already is just appaling. It is a common belief that is justification for what Whites had inflicted on minority populations, unless they become anti-racist and do the most for these oppressed groups.

Now that many know it's going down, I wonder what they will do with previous theories that allege Whites will still prosper through these demographic changes. These include how non-White birth/immigration rates would decline just as the Whites have once they reach a certain level, or that the nations with most migrants are in the Middle East.

The funniest thing of all is that many people celebrate these events as, "Finally! White genocide is here OLOLOL XD! The racists at Fox News are gonna be so mad!" while their compatriots claim they are only "anti-white supremacy", not "anti-white" and that ture examples of the latter are rare assuming they are exaggerating their celebration.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

That just means that being white is 8.6% more special than it used to be. We also don't breed like rabbits.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

White supremacists should purchase TV ads that ask: have you fucked a white person today?

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Hitler paid white aryan german women to have babies. If white supremacy was a real thing the US Government would be paying white women to pump out white babies and pull abortion eugenics shit on colored babies and totally end welfare for colored people. Call me back when you see that kind of fuckery cause then we'll be in the shit. I'm white and I am damn proud of it. Blue eyes, fair of hair, and tall. Don't fuck with white people. Just ask the plains indians and the citizens of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. You don't ever want to play cowboys and indians. The cowboys always win even if they have to think up a better gun.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

If you've been out of the US, you might appreciate that every word of this sounds 'American' to many overseas. This is what white supremacist America sounds like to others, even if it's only a comment shared by very few people. This is how the reputation of Americans has developed overseas: arrogant, over-confident, "over-smart", racist, lacking intelligence, lacking knowledge, lacking an understanding of history, aggressive, crude, not clever, not interesting, etc., etc.

This is NOT a criticism of you, IkeConn, but rather a note about what you've written. I suspect you don't write like this often, as I would think you know that this is indeed unhinged, but also quintessentially American, according to many non-Americans.

[–]peaceful 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

This is what white supremacist America sounds like

You are what anti-whites sound like.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Been out of the US many times. I was the big green guy with the M-60 Machine Gun that fell out of the sky.