you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I don't care about the market being free, that's just a mask for parasites to use to enslave people.

Governments can very easily regulate markets on behalf of the people rather than businesses, it's been done many times throughout history. You lolbert morons take a specific example of what happens under a hostile plutocracy and then pretend it's a principle that must happen in every government. But a nationalist government isn't going to be under the foot of jews and capitalists, so your deeb goncerns about how regulation hurts the little guy won't apply. Instead the regulations will help the little guy and hurt the bankers, monopolists etc that you're actually just advocating for and protecting knowingly or not.

[–]StrategicTactic 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

So you want to answer something that wasn't asked. Got it. Next time perhaps you should read the question before you spout your drivel and whine about how it will be so good under your method and everyone else on the planet should submit to your desires.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

He is asking the alt right whether the market should be free or guided by the state.

You are autistic and unable to understand basic contextual cues. Obviously a market isn't a 'free market' if it has 'government meddling' by definition. Your assertion that this is the question being asked is incredibly stupid, what kind of idiot doesn't know what the term free market means? He is asking an ethical question to a political group, hence him asking this question in /s/debatealtright.

Stupid libtard.

[–]StrategicTactic 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

But you didn't respond to him, you responded to my answer. Have you met your quota of ad homenim attacks for the day? Lets see:

You are autistic and unable to understand basic contextual cues. what kind of idiot
Stupid libtard.

Clearly you cannot use logic to dismantle any arguments if you already are resorting to 4 personal attacks. Perhaps you should reread the site rules and figure out how to debate. The very idea that people have a free market and government restrictions at the same time is why people think the US is a democracy- poor education and propaganda. There is no such thing as free market dictated by the government, any more than there is freedom to do what you want while enslaved. So argue for your chains, but it does not change the argument. There is no free market with third party control.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My apologies, I see you are a top of the bell curve poster. As you were.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Midwit theory strikes again.

Low IQ: "Uhh yeah capitalism bad cuz uhh... gimme dat shit fo free, ya feel me??"

Midwits: "Capitalism is GREAT because I get to CONSOOM! So what if Jews control it all, are you a BIGOT or something?? Ishmael and his freind Tyrone on the magic picture box told me people who say mean numbers like statistics are EVIL RACISTS and people who buy every new product are good, smart goys!!"

High IQ: "Capitalism is bad because it facilitates the control and destruction of our nations by underhanded and disingenuous investors and businessmen who seek only endless, meaningless growth and profits no matter the cost to the nation or its people"

There really should be more research into this subject. Probably just a meme but there actually could be more to it.

[–]NayenezganiNot alt-right 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The more I think about the philosophical basis of right-wing libertarianism, the more insane it seems. If we were to take the concepts of voluntary association and individualism to their logical conclusion, then why don't we all stop being heterotrophic multicellular organisms? Lack of consent is also the rationale of some people who embrace anti-natalism. Remember this person who wanted to sue his parents for giving birth to him: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47154287

Regarding mitwit theory, retards are so lacking in their adaptive faculties that running on the bare minimum can only work if they were instinctually right. I think the Lindy effect might be applicable here. The longer certain forms of retardation persist, the longer they may be expected to thrive because of their proven durability.

[–]YJaewedwqewqClerical Fascist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The more I think about the philosophical basis of right-wing libertarianism, the more insane it seems. If we were to take the concepts of voluntary association and individualism to their logical conclusion, then why don't we all stop being heterotrophic multicellular organisms? Lack of consent is also the rationale of some people who embrace anti-natalism. Remember this person who wanted to sue his parents for giving birth to him: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47154287

Right-Wing Libertarianism is more or less a ploy by megacorporations to trick the stupid and well-intentioned into becoming corporate slaves. They think that corportions are these kind, benevolent creatures that are only bad because of government intervention, which is laughably naïve.