all 10 comments

[–]UserAetheria 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

That's disturbing, but not surprising.

[–]Sonofzeus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

“Black culture” is an oxymoron.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I've gotta be honest. I could care less about showing or talking about this. Everyone in our circles have already seen this stuff and know that it just genetics not culture.

Sure, share it out to normies (force them to see it as much as possible to force cognitive dissonance) but beyond that there really isn't much to analyze here. There's already a mountain of evidence that these are a different species of human, with different hominid ancestors and no place among the structured nations. What to do? Being isolated and left to return to live in balance with nature would be the most compassionate and logical path for Africans.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

There's already a mountain of evidence that these are a different species of human

If this was true they wouldn't be able to produce fertile offspring with whites and you guys wouldn't have to be convincing the whites race-mixing with them that it is wrong. Neanderthals were far more genetically distant to whites than whites are to blacks, yet even they left traces of DNA in modern Europeans. At best you could maybe define blacks as a separate sub-species.

https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/7uis/plot_of_genetics_of_human_races_chimps_denisovans/

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-neandertal-brethren/

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My bad. I meant to say breed.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks Mr. Spock for splitting the semantic hairs. How about this, they're a markedly stupider, more violent rapey genetic branch, subspecies, strain, breed, offshoot, whatever.. of humanoids.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

On average, yes you'd be correct.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

While we're discussing semantics, the definition of species is, AFAIK, two different species cannot bear fertile offspring, but they can still sometimes breed. e.g. mules

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The other source I cited brought up mules when discussing how Neanderthals are also a sub-species rather than a separate species.

After isolation, if members of the split populations encounter one another and cannot produce viable offspring that can themselves later successfully interbreed and produce viable offspring (hybrids such as mules are infertile), then these two populations constitute two different species.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-neandertal-brethren/

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Typical.