YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEVLIAzlnHA

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@martinezperspective:2/Interview-with-Martinez-Perspective-video:0

He conducted himself pretty well, though he could have had a more concise definition for the 'Great Replacement' and 'race realism'.

I'd say, for example, that race realism is at its simplest the belief that race is real. More accurately, it refers to a belief-system in which race is regarded at the very least as an objective category—it doesn't matter what the specific beliefs contained within it are so long as they lead to that conclusion, though they usually are overwhelmingly biological-psychological.

Race denialism refers either to the absence of such a belief-system, or a belief-system in which race is actively disregarded as real (e.g. as a 'social construct').

I mostly agree with the views he expressed throughout. I'd be Rightward of him on feminism, though interestingly I think that even though he seems slightly more moderate on that, he places too much focus on it. For me, feminism is a surface-level problem rather than a root-level problem, and I'm not for focusing on surface-level problems. I'm also much less pan-European, though it's obvious that all Europeans share the same enemies at the current time and therefore should fight against them together. Obviously these are trivial differences.

Hopefully some Leftoids get wrecked soon.