Simone Biles' withdrawal is more impressive than winning

submitted by [deleted] from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not to drag out the discussion, but I'd like to respond to a couple of major issues:

Your claim was that negro was a bad word, but I have demonstrated to you that it isn't.

I did not see a reliable demonstration of this, whereas I offered a number of quotations from a search for 'negro' & 'definition', demonstrating that the word, negro, is indeed offensive in all definitions, given its previous use, and it's apparent that those who use the word, negro, hate blacks and/or people of color. (I'd be surprised if you claimed that you genuinely don't hate or dislike blacks.).

Whites are underrepresented in the US government. Whitest are marginalized by the majority in power (jews).

This is very difficult to discuss because the Jewish US politicians list themselves as 'white'. Moreover, there are pro-Israel US politicians who are 'white'. An impressive project at DAR, or which could be arranged by /u/Jesus would be a study of the number of Jewish and partialy Jewish members in the US government, while also studying pro-Israel politicians. A 'free speech' website like Saidit can do this rather well.

But technically, your comment is not correct for the US Congress:

https://www.statista.com/chart/18905/us-congress-by-race-ethnicity/

Or for the US population, which is 60.3% 'non-hispanic white'.

Interestingly, those most outspoken against Israel tend to me non-white.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

/u/Dragonerne

Zionist owned wikipedia:

Negroid (less commonly called Congoid) is an obsolete racial grouping of various people indigenous to Africa south of the area which stretched from the southern Sahara desert in the west to the African Great Lakes in the southeast,[1] but also to isolated parts of South and Southeast Asia (Negritos).[2] The term is derived from a now-disproven theory of biological race.[3]

Follow-up archive of a anon who disagrees:

People when I studied in high school, in the biological textbook were counted Europeoid, Mongoloid, Negroid and Australoid races. If the term is obsolete in your country due to polit-correctness, please do not expand these feeling on other countries.--MathFacts (talk) 09:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Also it seems that the source that claims the term is obsolete aslo claims that there are no human races at all: a system for classifying people based on the false assumption that humans can be unambiguously placed into "races" on the basis of selected traits such as skin color, hair form, and body shape. Advocates of this approach incorrectly believe that there are more or less distinct populations of people from different geographic regions. Negroid, Mongoloid, and Caucasoid are examples of typological groupings. I think this is a very biased approach, if not fringe.

...the citation at the start DOES NOT suggest Negroid as an obsolete term, The opposite in fact: It's a list of terms that ARE used when describing human variation. Anyway, there is NO citation on the page that suggests the terms are obsolete, and in fact, the penultimate paragraph actually states the term IS still used, and merely suggests the PC brigade are against it. (I've also seen a recent programme in which Negroid and Caucasoid were used concerning Craniometry.) The page also states Mongoloid and Caucasoid are obsolete, their own pages don't even state such a thing. Seems suspect to me.

I think I detected bias against whites in the article Caucasian Race. Whereas in the articles about the mongoloid race, the negroid race and the australoid race the words "IS A GROUPING OF HUMANS", in the article about the caucasian race "IS" is substituted by "was": "was a grouping of humans".

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Its just propaganda. Anyone who says biological race is a disproven theory is a moron

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed, and I have no hatred for races, seems like those who want to deny race want to deny identity of others even if they do not care about race. Someone obviously cares about race and wants to make it obsolete for others. hence, they might be using reverse psycology to racilise races under racial Zionism. Cannot help but see those who deny race are 'Jews' and those who racilise caucasians are Zionists.