you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Oh, the generational hatred. Stop that. It's part of the divide-and-conquer strategy used by the Jews to destroy us.

It isn't "the boomers". EVERY SINGLE GENERATION vows to do a million times better than the previous one(s) and goes on to utterly fail.

[–]insta 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

The boomers simultaneously benefited from being the majority voting demographic and refused to acknowledge this and actively worked to undermine this voting majority for the future generations. Once baby boomers die off and older GenX start going we're fucked voting wise.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Voting. Really. What has voting ever accomplished, except give you the choice of whose dick comes up your asshole as you get raped by the government's cronyism?

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The whole argument of "No Political Solutions" is kinda outside the scope of the argument at hand. If you want to argue voting is a farce that's something I'd actually agree to, however, in our system is does benefit to have a large group identity that votes more or less similarly.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Direct democracy or nazism, those are the only two possible political solutions.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I understand the latter, but how would direct democracy solve anything? With dwindling numbers that will only hurt your position, no?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Direct democracy means officials can't be bought, and policies made BY the people, FOR the people. For example, voting the immigrants out of positions of power, requiring at least X generations of belonging to the nation before being able to work in certian positions or getting elected, etc. Basically direct democracy allows the largest group (still whites at this point) to dictate policy. It's good.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think you're seriously underestimating the amount of white guilt riddled Americans. I would guess the percentage of the population will vote enthusiastically for anti-white policies will quickly reach 50%.

I'm not up-to-date on the racial breakdown so wikipedia says:

Whites ~60%

Hispanics 18.5%

Blacks 13.4%

Asians, Natives, others: ~10%

So that means if 75% of non-whites vote for anti-white policies, and only 30% of white guilted whites do as well, that's 50% of the population. I'm not willing to roll the dice on those numbers.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This doesn't mean anything. You're taking numbers from this system and saying another system wouldn't work. No, not with those numbers from this system.

It's like saying a gasoline car can't work when you have only diesel available.

[–]insta 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's like saying a gasoline car can't work when you have only diesel available.

I mean, it wouldn't? If there's no gasoline available your car won't work. Terrible analogy.

I assume from your explanation that the new system would either disenfranchise non-whites or their population percentages would be changed. That's the only way you could ever possibly get direct democracy to work.