you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If I can't voluntarily walk away then you are enslaving me and I have the right to resist that.

No, slavery is different from having to obey laws.

Slavery is being owned by another person and being forced to work for them under threat of violence.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Slavery is being owned by another person and being forced to work for them under threat of violence.

That's chatel slavery. There are other types of slavery like debt slavery, wage slavery, sexual slavery, indentured slavery, serfdom, etc. That being said I do think we are leaving the debt slavery phase of the empire and moving towards something closer to chatel slavery.

The average person is in violation of 3 or more federal laws every day. That's by design. That means at any time if the authorities don't like how a pleb is acting they can use lawfare. The cost to defend yourself in court today is outside of the means of the average person. Oligarchs know these two facts very well. Therefore when one of their slaves gets out of line they do impose violence (in the form of lawfare) against them. Once you're in prison you're totally fucked so a prison sentence is a VERY real threat of violence. Another way to look at what has happened to modern white people is a term called 'anarcho tyranny' which means the legal system that was meant to protect and grow the European people is being warped and turned on them and not used against people that exploit and attack them.

Here's an example

https://i.postimg.cc/3JqVM02y/1626554172192.jpg

No, slavery is different from having to obey laws.

I would just ask you if you believe in the mainstream narrative of the holocaust. If you do you'd probably recognize the right of European Jews to kill or do whatever is necessary to escape genocide. Is that a legal right for Jews or a right given to them by a larger power? I assert that whites have the same rights as Jews. Whites are not a sub caste of Jews despite their doctrines and propaganda and if we recognize as a group that our rights have been subverted, our people enslaved and genocided the 'law' of our enemy is no longer justified in any way. Not legally, morally or divinely.

Furthermore, within my catholic faith there are two traditions on violence. The first, some war is justified. You might know that as the 'just war' doctrine. But there is another less talked about Catholic tradition. According to Robert the Monk in 1095 at the council of Clermont Pope Urban the 2nd declared

Enter upon the road to the Holy Sepulcher; wrest that land from the wicked race, and subject it to yourselves. That land which as the Scripture says "floweth with milk and honey," was given by God into the possession of the children of Israel Jerusalem is the navel of the world; the land is fruitful above others, like another paradise of delights. This the Redeemer of the human race has made illustrious by His advent, has beautified by residence, has consecrated by suffering, has redeemed by death, has glorified by burial. This royal city, therefore, situated at the centre of the world, is now held captive by His enemies, and is in subjection to those who do not know God, to the worship of the heathens. She seeks therefore and desires to be liberated, and does not cease to implore you to come to her aid. From you especially she asks succor, because, as we have already said, God has conferred upon you above all nations great glory in arms. Accordingly undertake this journey for the remission of your sins, with the assurance of the imperishable glory of the kingdom of heaven.

This was the birth of a new doctrine of Christianity. Not only are some wars just but at times God impels you to wage them and guides your hand.

Bottom Line. There are higher laws than man's laws. Not only is it just to oppose laws of evil men but we will all die with the stain of sin if we do NOT engage the enemies of our people. Never forget that Europeans (both as Pagans and Christians) are warriors, conquerors, and have turned violence towards our enemies into a high art. We will not be extinguished easily. There's a reason whites are still here.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You need to start having some original thought. If you are forced to follow laws under threat of violence, and these laws threaten your well being or those of others, then it's slavery. If you are coerced into using products and working with companies due to how the government chooses to interact with the populace (insurance, land agencies, banks, etc) then you are a slave.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you are forced to follow laws under threat of violence, and these laws threaten your well being or those of others, then it's slavery.

1) You get a say in the laws by exercising your democratic rights. Slaves don't have democratic rights.

2) I agree that violence is a crap way to enforce laws. I think that the removal of freedoms is the only appropriate punishment.