you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The muslim arabs and turks imported over 30 million black slaves to their realms over a period of more than 1000 years. Today there's little genetic trace of them in these countries.

If you actually believe this then I don't know what to tell you.... Arabs are like muds

And today, they have no black problem.

They are blacks

European kindness prevented such a fate for black slaves in the Americas and capitalist greed led to the importation and breeding of more and more blacks. Today, their descendents pay the price.

European kindness towards the jews

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The muslim arabs and turks imported over 30 million black slaves to their realms over a period of more than 1000 years. Today there's little genetic trace of them in these countries.

This is well documented. There's no genetic trace of those slaves because the arabs castrated as a condition of importation. What is there to not 'believe'? Nobody denies that the arab world heavily dealt in castrated slaves of many racial groups.

And today, they have no black problem.

Now you're calling arab people black people? You can't be serious.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Arabs got a huge black admixture across both NA and ME.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your confusing 'black' admixture with 'african' admixture. North africans are genetically different than sub Saharan Africans. We also know that northern african arabs have been in constant conflict with subsaharan african tribes like the Bantu. Look at the arab genocide by black tribes when the British pulled out Kenya in the 60's. There were pits of arab bodies as the blacks pushed into North African arab controlled areas and slaughtered them. The official story is that it was 'revenge' for thousands of years of slavery but that was really just a cover for black violent behavior. So if there is arab and black genetic mixing it's probably minimal because these two groups don't like each other very much.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your confusing 'black' admixture with 'african' admixture

I'm not.

North africans are genetically different than sub Saharan Africans.

Yes and arabs in NA and ME have significant ssa admixture through interbreeding.

So if there is arab and black genetic mixing it's probably minimal because these two groups don't like each other very much.

You're right that they dislike each other but the admixture is there.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ok but your original comment seemed to be implying that arabs are just 'black people' which isn't really true and I don't think the admixture is as much as you think it is. Although maybe someone else in the sub that know the genetics can inform us both.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok but your original comment seemed to be implying that arabs are just 'black people'

Yeah that was wrong. I think its around 10-20% admixture, at least in some arab populations like the berbers

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

South Moroccans have 33% sub-Saharan admixture on average.

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-990b922bba92176c2f8c73e45e2064f6