Have Black people ever said "thank you" for all the nice things White people gave to them?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from (self.debatealtright)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (44 children)

[deleted]

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (43 children)

    Did blacks ever ask for this?

    When someone refuses a donation, they typically return it.

    But black people have neither returned the billions in free stuff given to them, nor have they left the USA and go back to Africa to get away from them.

    [–][deleted]  (29 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (28 children)

      If they don't apologize now, then the Hispanic majority that's predicted to take over in the future wont be anywhere as kind or charitable to them.

      Black Americans are left with two choices:

      1. Stop White Genocide in order to not lose their victim status when Hispanics take over

      2. Go back to Africa and return to the simple life of enslaving each other for thousands of years, like their ancestors did.

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      Black Americans are left with two choices:

      1. Stop White Genocide in order to not lose their victim status when Hispanics take over

      Ok, why would you expect an entire race of people to stop anything at all? Outside of criminals, that's not something they're actively doing, and genocide isn't typically the fucking plan for criminals. The entire group of American black folks are not standing there with coat hangers at OB clinics that white people attend, they're not barring them from fertility clinics, standing in front of their bedroom doors and telling them they can't pregnant, they're not controlling their bank accounts and saying they just can't afford to start a family.

      I don't get your tactics here.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Nothing changed. I still agree countries like Zambia or Botswana are slowly getting better over time.

        But slavery has never been illegal in Africa, and it's more or less the natural order of things on that continent.

        We only saw the end of the slave trade thanks to British ships enforcing naval blockades on Africa, ironically.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_Africa

        [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

        Stop White Genocide in order to not lose their victim status when Hispanics take over

        "White Genocide" is a lie, "White Genocide" does not exist, Whites are not being shipped off to concentration camps or killing fields to be murdered in large numbers. Turks killing upwards of 1.5 million Armenians is genocide. The Nazis killing 6 million Jews and 4 million others is genocide.

        The term “white genocide” was first coined by American white nationalist David Lane while he was serving time for murdering a Jewish radio host.

        The falsehood of “white genocide” is pervasive. The people behind these murders share a common fear of the end of a white majority in U.S. And this dangerous myth is seeping into the mainstream, just as easily heard on the evening cable news as it is seen on flyers defacing college campuses.

        This radical and racist idea is now the animating principle of many of our elected leadership and the guiding light of the current administration. We’ve seen this idea become mainstreamed for three reasons:

        One, in the mid-1980s, 77 percent of the U.S. population was white. Today, it’s roughly 60 percent. In 30 years, it will be under 50 percent. This kind of change creates existential anxiety that, after being fed a steady media diet of xenophobia and fear, metastasizes into hate.

        Nobody is stopping white people from procreating.

        Shalom

        ✡️

        [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

        Please mods, ban this troll.

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

        He's partially right.

        Whites are not being directly stopped from procreating in a strict sense. They are just being heavily propagandize not to procreate and since they are white people and only breed when there are enough resources the modern financial slavery whites are in is what's really blocking their procreation. White genocide is a reference to those attacks on whites not to direct physical restraint on breeding. Women voluntarily take birth control. Women voluntarily abort their babies. Men voluntarily watch porn and avoid socializing and breeding. Men voluntarily delay marriage and fuck around hedonically with multiple partners. Women voluntarily obsess for instagram likes or Only Fan payments.

        Of course there is a lot more nuance to this subject. You could make the argument that all these Jew led attacks do lead up to a very really physical restraint on breeding but /u/shalomeveryone is only trolling rhetorically not factually in this instance. He's allowed to keep commenting for now because he's a comically easy troll to counter. So easy in fact he makes me wonder if he isn't really on our side.

        [–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        He's not an alt right troll. Have you debated with these people? His views completely line up with theirs to the letter. Even sutbtle things like bringing up the Armenian genocide but lowballing the number by half a million is a totally Jewish thing and not likely something you'd see an alt right troll do. There are tons of other little hints and clues that he's a legit zionut. The fact he brought up some Jewish radio shock jock that was murdered 40 years ago is a totally Jewish thing as well. You can find examples of dozens of whites murdered in what were likely racially motivated attacks just in the last several months alone, and this Jew still brings up some murder from like 1980. These people never forget.

        Whatever you do don't ban him.

        [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        The fact he brought up some Jewish radio shock jock that was murdered 40 years ago is a totally Jewish thing as well.

        I'm merely highlighting how the idea of "White Genocide" is pure lunacy. Genocide is the mass killing of people, whites aren't being killed en masse. I mentioned the radio host murder for a reason. The person who coined "White Genocide" is a murderous lunatic.

        You can find examples of dozens of whites murdered in what were likely racially motivated attacks

        Can you name any White victims who were killed by Jewish hate groups in the last months alone? Black hate groups in the last months alone? Or Whites killed by some run of the mill racist?

        Whatever you do don't ban him.

        Someone in a sub called s/debatealtright who has no problem debating someone with a differing opinion without calling that person a troll. You get what this sub is supposed to be, that is refreshing. No sarcasm or anything like that on my end, I'm 100% sincere.

        Shalom

        ✡️

        [–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        I mentioned the radio host murder for a reason. The person who coined "White Genocide" is a murderous lunatic.

        Who is claiming he personally "coined" the phrase? Sounds like some possible ret-conning to me. The fact he may have used the phrase doesnt mean he coined it, and it seems unlikely some dimwitted thug coined anything. I say this as someone who thinks the term white genocide is idiotic.

        This is a game that you guys love to play. Pick out a phrase, term or argument you dont like, find a bad man who once said something similar, then claim that anyone who says something similar is obviously a bad man. For instance cherry pick something Hitler once said, then claim anyone who ever makes a similar argument is an obvious Nazi who is just like Hitler. It's a childish tactic that only works on idiots, and using the same logic you could essentially ban any and all speech by finding examples of bad people saying the same thing, including banning all criticism of anyone white.

        [–]Erasmus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Of course you're a troll, Mr.:

        Shalom

        ✡️

        That's trolling.

        Another aspect of trolling is not debating in good faith. You know very well that the definition of genocide is not "the mass killing of people".

        From the Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, quoting Lemkin:

        Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different *actions aimed at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups*, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be a disintegration of political and social institutions—of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed at the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed at individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group (1944, p. 79).

        The best word for this stage of the game is ethnocide, but ethnocide is simply a type of genocide.

        I'd encourage you to read more, but you know all this already.

        https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/ethnocide

        [–]peaceful✞ 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

        The conditions of genocide are forced (diversity, integration, assimilation, tolerance, immigration). All white countries are being flooded and force assimilated with tens of millions of non-whites. Blacks have practically a whole continent but whites can’t have a school anywhere on the planet. When whites flee they’re chased down with “diversity.”

        [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        I agree and in that respect there is absolute force. White people didn't vote to be replaced in Europe or North America. When whites even mildly resist their replacement they are terrorized by the state and it's shock troops.

        My point still stands though that even with millions of non whites flooding into our cities and states there's no police force directly blocking white men and women from procreating. There are certainly pressures and soft power moves but no direct force.

        [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Diversity is not genocide, below is what makes up genocide.

        UN Resolution 260 Article II(c)

        Article II

        In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

        (a) Killing members of the group;

        (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

        (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

        Shalom

        ✡️

        [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Someone is a troll just because they have a different opinion than you do? What did I say that is trolling? Drawing attention to the fact that millions of whites are not being massacred therefore there is no white holocaust is trolling?

        Shalom

        ✡️

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        I mean, trolling being obvious here, but as far as the procreating part goes he's sort of not wrong. Whether it be for pursuing a life of hedonism, being afraid of potentially fucking up another person's life, affordability, time, fear of overcrowding, etc.-- no matter the country, white people generally do not have many children if they have them at all. When they do they're nearly always religious fanatics or white trash.

        [–]peaceful✞ 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

        Under international law, genocide is any attempt to eliminate a group by any means. Killing is not necessary. Mass sterilization and force blending are two methods of genocide which do not involve killing. Mass non-white immigration plus forced assimilation in ALL white countries undoubtedly meets the definition of genocide under UN Resolution 260 Article II(c) “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

        Raphael Lemkin, the man who invented the term “genocide” stated: “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.”

        [–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Using the term genocide is stupid and unnecessary. What is happening now is a lot of things, but calling it genocide is dangerous, especially since there is at least a real possibility that some of the ones responsible for shit like CRT and replacement level immigration would probably love to bring about a real genocide in the future but the numbers are still not enough in their favor. Mass ethnic cleansing is probably a more accurate term, but really the most accurate and least controversial and hence normie friendly term I've seen is simply replacement.

        What we are seeing is a continuously escalating propaganda war right now, so words matter. It's hard to take people seriously about what's happening when they throw around the word genocide.

        [–]peaceful✞ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        I understand your critique, genocide can be shrill-sounding, but on the other hand replacement isn't defined as a crime under law.

        [–]Erasmus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        The proper term at this stage of the game is ethnocide.

        [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Mass sterilization and force blending are two methods of genocide which do not involve killing.

        Where are Whites being sterilized en masse? Where are Whites being forced to blend with nonwhites?

        Mass non-white immigration plus forced assimilation in ALL white countries undoubtedly meets the definition of genocide under UN Resolution 260 Article II(c)

        No it doesn't.

        “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

        What is deliberately being inflicted on whites to bring their conditions of life to bring on its physical destruction? Whites have the most financial wealth in America. Whites have the longest life expectancy. Are there European countries in which whites do not have the most financial wealth and longest life expectancy?

        UN Resolution 260 Article II(c)

        I'm glad you brought that up Article II. I would have preferred you mentioned the entire article. How many whites would it have killed to include Part A, B, and D in your post?

        Article II

        In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

        (a) Killing members of the group;

        (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

        (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

        A. Whites aren't being killed en masse. If I am wrong, please tell me where they are.

        B. White group(s) are causing whites serious bodily or mental harm? If I am wrong, please tell me who is causing serious bodily and metal harm.

        C. Already mentioned above.

        D. Who or what is imposing measures to prevent Whites from being born? It's my understanding nobody is. If I am wrong, please tell me who is imposing such measures.

        E. Nobody is taking away White children and giving them to nonwhites. If I am wrong, please tell me who is taking White children away from White parents and giving them to nonwhites.

        Raphael Lemkin, the man who invented the term “genocide” stated: “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation.

        He never said, "genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation."

        This is what he said about genocide.

        Lemkin defined genocide as “the destruction of a nation or an ethnic group.” He built the word, he said, “from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homicide, infanticide, etc.” He wrote, “Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”This was an important element of the definition of genocide: people were killed or excluded not because of anything they did or said or thought but simply because they were members of a particular group.

        Shalom

        ✡️

        [–]peaceful✞ 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        He never said, "genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation."

        Incorrect. http://genocidewatch.net/2013/03/14/raphael-lemkin-defines-genocide-2/

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Canada, the U.S, France, UK, Germany, Australia, Sweden and many more, are all projected to have a non-white majority populations in our lifetime.

        Call it "White replacement" or "White genocide", the effects are still the same. World governments are doing nothing to increase the share of White populations. They are in fact, complicit with watching it shrink and are importing more third world immigrants to deal the final killing blow.

        And when White people are officially minorities in their own homeland, they will have no representation in government to protect them. South Africa or Zimbabwe are examples of this. You only need to elect one Robert Mugabe as head of state, who will make demands that White people hand over everything or face consequences.

        [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Call it "White replacement"

        It's not white replacement, no group of people are stopping whites from procreating like Black Americans and Hispanic Americans. There's a reason why the White American population is decreasing, White American Women don't act like using birth control is against the law. White women and White men are not being sterilized, if they want to have more White kids they are free to do so.

        World governments are doing nothing to increase the share of White populations.

        Because that's none of their business, no government should force Whites to have children if they don't want to. A person has the right to procreate or not procreate, it's up to the individual not the government.

        They are in fact, complicit with watching it shrink and are importing more third world immigrants to deal the final killing blow.

        Respecting a White person's right to procreate or not procreate does not mean there is any nefarious complicity. Governments should be in the business of telling people how many kids they will be having?

        And when White people are officially minorities in their own homeland, they will have no representation in government to protect them. South Africa or Zimbabwe are examples of this.

        South Africa and Zimbabwe are not examples of this. South Africa and Zimbabwe is in Africa, Africa is not the homeland of Whites. Europe is the homeland of Whites. In Africa, Whites were the invading and occupying force.

        You only need to elect one Robert Mugabe as head of state, who will make demands that White people hand over everything or face consequences.

        I don't see a nation like Germany, France, Norway, Finland, Belgium and England electing a Mugabe to rule over a White majority in their White homeland.

        Shalom

        ✡️

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        t's not white replacement, no group of people are stopping whites from procreating like Black Americans and Hispanic Americans. There's a reason why the White American population is decreasing, White American Women don't act like using birth control is against the law. White women and White men are not being sterilized, if they want to have more White kids they are free to do so.

        Whites are already a minority in the world. India and China have populations that dwarf Europe, but they still send millions of immigrants anyway. That's not something you can compete against using birth rates or any other measurement.

        The only practical solution is to implement a quota system, which is what the U.S and many other White countries had before the 1960s, that prioritized importing White immigrants first.

        Because that's none of their business, no government should force Whites to have children if they don't want to. A person has the right to procreate or not procreate, it's up to the individual not the government.

        It is there business. Society can't survive when Whites are a minority, or more Old people greatly outnumber young people needed to care for them.

        Respecting a White person's right to procreate or not procreate does not mean there is any nefarious complicity. Governments should be in the business of telling people how many kids they will be having?

        See above. Governments must implement these policies to avoid going extinct.

        South Africa and Zimbabwe are not examples of this. South Africa and Zimbabwe is in Africa, Africa is not the homeland of Whites. Europe is the homeland of Whites. In Africa, Whites were the invading and occupying force.

        South Africa was empty when Europeans got there, and Zimbabwe was stuck in the stone ages before Europeans offered them a chance at civilization. Since these fuckers overthrew their governments and made life worse for everyone, it's safe to say Europeans were in the right to live there and stay in power given that the alternatives are worse.

        I don't see a nation like Germany, France, Norway, Finland, Belgium and England electing a Mugabe to rule over a White majority in their White homeland.

        So lets keep them majority White, instead of inviting more third world immigrants to displace them. That's what it means to stop White Genocide.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Not at all.

          How many Blacks do you see moving to Mexico? When illegal immigrants from Africa arrive, they immediately keep walking towards the U.S border instead of staying.

          https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/06/26/why-record-numbers-of-african-migrants-are-showing-up-at-the-u-s-mexican-border/

          And even if they do try to accept "multiculturalism", the Hispanics are having none of it. Once their gangs start claiming new territory, Blacks will have no choice but to run.

          https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ramona-hate-crime-20160707-snap-story.html

          [–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

          When someone refuses a donation, they typically return it.

          Did you really just call genocide, enslavement, and forced migration a "donation"?

          [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

          Africa has all those things sweetie. You may have even heard of the last big one in the 90s called Rwanda.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

          It's actually annoying why do only White people get brow beaten with this? Every race has slavery, but only Whites were expected to apologize. Hypocrisy much?

          On top of that, Blacks were still pretty much cared for. They were given free food and shelter in America. It was nothing like Haiti where the slaves were worked to death and quickly replaced with new ones.

          [–]Daddiescummies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

          Rwanda and neighbouring Burundi were assigned to Germany by the Berlin Conference of 1884,[32] and Germany established a presence in the country in 1897 with the formation of an alliance with the king.[33] German policy was to rule the country through the Rwandan monarchy; this system had the added benefit of enabling colonization with small European troop numbers.[34] The colonists favoured the Tutsi over the Hutu when assigning administrative roles, believing them to be migrants from Ethiopia and racially superior.[35] The Rwandan king welcomed the Germans, using their military strength to widen his rule.[36] Belgian forces took control of Rwanda and Burundi in 1917 during World War I,[37] and from 1926 began a policy of more direct colonial rule.[38][39] The Belgians modernised the Rwandan economy, but Tutsi supremacy remained, leaving the Hutu disenfranchised.[40]

          In the early 1930s, Belgium introduced a permanent division of the population by classifying Rwandans into three ethnic (ethno-racial) groups, with the Hutu representing about 84% of the populace, Tutsi about 15%, and Twa about 1% of the population.[30] Compulsory identity cards were issued labeling (in the rubric for 'ethnicity and race') each individual as either Tutsi, Hutu, Twa, or Naturalised. While it had previously been possible for particularly wealthy Hutus to become honorary Tutsis, the identity cards prevented any further movement between the groups[41] and made socio-economic groups into rigid ethnic groups.[42]

          The ethnic identities of the Hutu and Tutsi were reshaped and mythologized by the colonizers.[31] Christian missionaries promoted the theory about the "Hamitic" origins of the kingdom, and referred to the distinctively Ethiopian features and hence, foreign origins, of the Tutsi "caste".[31][43] These mythologies provide the basis for anti-Tutsi propaganda in 1994.[31]:421

          You're so stupid and racist, you're probably scared of your own shit.

          [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

          I don't see how that debunks what I said? Blame the Africans for not believing in "diversity is our strength"?

          Ohhhhhhhhhhh, I know what you're trying to do. You're trying to say Africans lived in complete peace before White people arrived. Sorry, but you're still wrong. Even without Europeans, the continent was always chaos.

          For example, it was considered a tradition to use captured slaves for human sacrifice rituals.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_Customs_of_Dahomey

          Since Dahomey was a significant military power involved in the slave trade, slaves and human sacrifice became crucial aspects of the ceremony. Captives from war and criminals were killed for the deceased kings of Dahomey. During the ceremony, around 500 prisoners would be sacrificed. As many as 4,000 were reported killed In one of these ceremonies in 1727.[5][6][7] Most of the victims were sacrificed through decapitation, a tradition widely used by Dahomean kings, and the literal translation for the Fon name for the ceremony Xwetanu is "yearly head business".[8] In later years this ceremony also included the spilling of human blood from the sacrificed.[4] Related with this, there was also a significant military parade in the ceremonies that further displayed the military might of the kingdom of Dahomey.[2]

          The only reason we don't hear more about this stuff is because Africans never really kept much documents or writing behind.

          [–]WorldSharp 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          chilling with dahomeys

          [–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Remind me of all the genocides that happened BEFORE white people started state enforcement of racial social castes

          [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

          Lol "state enforcement".

          Last time I checked, AFRICA HAS NEVER SENT A FUCKING SHIP to take back all their slaves from the New World. Why is that? Because Africans never cared about what happened to their own people they hunted down everywhere and sold to the highest bidder. There was never any racism. Black society has barely evolved past the stone age, and they remain undeveloped compared to the rest of the world.

          [–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Last time I checked, AFRICA HAS NEVER SENT A FUCKING SHIP to take back all their slaves from the New World

          Because they are all dead babe.

          Black society has barely evolved past the stone age, and they remain undeveloped compared to the rest of the world.

          Today I learned that "development" consists of slaving, genocide, and being a fat little virgin trying to justify slavery on the internet.

          [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Because they are all dead babe.

          So that's the excuse? Why not take back all the slave descendants who are alive today?

          Since slavery is officially over, you're making the argument that White people shouldn't even be forced to live next to people that serve no purpose to them.

          Today I learned that "development" consists of slaving, genocide, and being a fat little virgin trying to justify slavery on the internet.

          Ironically, when Africa practiced slavery, development went nowhere. An industry based on trading humans like livestock has never quite lead to societies more advanced than the Bronze Age.

          When Europeans invented the steam engine, there was little use for agrarian civilizations. That's because strict human labor was being phased out in favor of more powerful machines that do the job better with less effort.

          [–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          What do you think this proves? That whites invented race and that made blacks genocide each other.

          Don't be ridiculous.

          [–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          So, you admit that the ruling elite use diversity to sow chaos? By the way, there are physiological differences between Hutus and Tutsis so it wasn't just something they made up. That write up is being disingenuous.

          https://www.quora.com/How-can-one-tell-whether-someone-is-Hutu-or-Tutsi

          [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          you're probably scared of your own shit.

          We're not scared of them, we're disgusted by them. You still don't understand our psychology. Leftists are the ones who are scared, of us. Every time leftists invent a new "phobia" it's projection.

          [–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          What genocide? What enslavement? Blacks were already slaves in Africa before they were moved to America. And the only "forced" migration that comes to my mind is that of Southern blacks moving North. Blacks really don't appreciate how good they had it here.