Have Black people ever said "thank you" for all the nice things White people gave to them?

submitted by radicalcentristNational Centrism from (self.debatealtright)

Any Black person born in the USA or brought over as a slave, instantly won the lottery.

Instead of running away from lions all day, or being forced to pick diamonds from the local Warlord owned mines, Blacks were gifted a 1st world civilization with absolutely zero effort involved.

Blacks are offered multiple free schooling opportunities, and they are also given preference for jobs even if their grades are terrible.

The average Black income in the U.S is $40,000. While pathetic by White standards, consider that the average African is lucky to ever make $500 in their entire life.

Blacks have a higher life expectancy thanks to the White Man. The average Black lives to 75 years old, whereas native Africans are lucky to survive child birth.

Blacks have the entire corporate world defending them. Walmart, Microsoft or Amazon would rather spend a trillion dollars on Blacklivesmatter commercials, then raise employee wages.

Speaking of which, if you're Black, you get money just for being Black. It's actually a paradox how are Black Americans still the poorest group, when the government cuts them welfare checks every month and even begs them to take high paying jobs away from other White people.

Blacks are also the only race that get two choices of women to mate with. The media encourages them to date either Black Women to preserve their race, but the media also tells them they can have White Women too and many commercials show Black Men having White Wives given to them.

Black people are also shielded by criticism for every type of wrong doing imaginable. If a police officer stops them, or if they rob a bank in New York, the government will say they are just "victims" of White supremacy and let them go.

The list goes on but Black people in America never had to do anything for the entire Western World to always come to their aid and defend them at all costs. They only had to be born on U.S soil to instantly be handed hundreds of years of progress built by another race with no questions asked.

It is easily the biggest charitable donation in all of human history and yet, have Black people ever said "Thank You" to White people for giving them so much free stuff?

top 100 commentsshow all 108
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

White people's mistake was that they were too kind. The muslim arabs and turks imported over 30 million black slaves to their realms over a period of more than 1000 years. Today there's little genetic trace of them in these countries. That's because they castrated the negro slaves at the get go. And today, they have no black problem.

European kindness prevented such a fate for black slaves in the Americas and capitalist greed led to the importation and breeding of more and more blacks. Today, their descendents pay the price.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Yup, it's a conclusion I reached with my last thread.

Brazil had the same problem from the get go. They actually imported more slaves than the U.S and they went ahead and race mixed with all of them. The result? 50% of the Brazilian population works themselves to death, feeding the other 50% who don't work at all and live on welfare, forever. That type of fate is coming to America once Whites are a minority....

Hispanics will control governments, Whites will be taxed more, and Blacks will still cry "We're oppressed. Give us more money!".

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That raises the question of what to do about the people supporting our oppression by paying taxes.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The result? 50% of the Brazilian population works themselves to death, feeding the other 50% who don't work at all and live on welfare, forever. That type of fate is coming to America once Whites are a minority....

Very good yes. Nice turnaround from the trolling of when u started here.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    No, thats not the case. He has been practicing how to blend in while pushing disinfo/subvert.

    His early comments would be 50% makes sense, then 50% wait what. He has been using dar to learn how to subvert dissident spaces. Thats my take.

    [–]TheJamesRocket 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Radicalcentrist has made many posts trying to push the vaccines, but he got torn to shreds every time. If hes trying to learn how to subvert us, hes still got a long way to go.

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Sure

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I hope thats true.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

    European kindness

    It's called Christianity, aka slave morality.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    In a white ethnostate both European kindness and christian morality are valuable. The high trust nature of Europeans is what sets us apart from the other races.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    In a white ethnostate both European kindness and christian morality are valuable.

    I disagree. It led to the current situation.

    The high trust nature of Europeans is what sets us apart from the other races.

    That has little to do with Christianity. I would argue Christianity leads to low trust because it's inherently distrustful of state power and the "sinful" nature of fellow citizens.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    So are you proposing paganism or atheism for a white belief system? Simply being 'anti christian' is not a position. White people are not Jews. We are not an endless debate society that simply gives power to the person with the best sophistry. Successful ethno nations have religious systems for their people. It's literally a death sentence for a race to not have a religious belief system. Or do you oppose whites having a successful ethnostate and good racial hygiene? Successful racial hygiene is an extension of a strong religious sytem. Or are you proposing some type of nietchian atheist fashy techno state? Please couple your criticisms with viable alternatives.

    Do you travel a lot? If you're white and you travel around the world people are going to call you one of two things. White or Christian. Why? Because Christianity is the religion of white people. If a new religion comes along and white people embrace it and practice it for 2000 years that will be the new religion of white people. That hasn't happened yet though. Christianity is implicitly white. And the history of Christianity is attached to the history of Europe. We should not try to erase our pagan roots and we should not try to erase our christian roots. Overtly bashing either is cringe and anti white.

    I'm all for respectful criticism of Christianity but when shit hits the fan in north america or Europe the people leading the 3rd position political parties are going to be Christians or Christian apologists. You won't be welcome in white encampments or white enclaves if you don't fit into either of those camps. There will be no white atheist political party that takes over north america. Atheism is a Jewish operation.

    [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You're misunderstanding me. I'm in no way saying we shouldn't have a religious belief system, we should. I don't wish my tragic atheism on anyone, but I'm just aware of Christianity's flaws. It's inherently problematic. And no, we should absolutely not have "an endless debate society that simply gives power to the person with the best sophistry". I'm thinking more along the lines of what existed in the ancient world. I think we should try to synthesize ancient European religious belief systems with the modern world. Fascism was an attempt to achieve just that.

    [–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I think its generalized empathy of Northwest Europeans. The Mexicans are catholic and they have no problem beheading people and throwing their remains into acid.

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    And today, they have no black problem.

    These people have 10-30% sub-Saharan admixture on average.

    https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-990b922bba92176c2f8c73e45e2064f6

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    The muslim arabs and turks imported over 30 million black slaves to their realms over a period of more than 1000 years. Today there's little genetic trace of them in these countries.

    If you actually believe this then I don't know what to tell you.... Arabs are like muds

    And today, they have no black problem.

    They are blacks

    European kindness prevented such a fate for black slaves in the Americas and capitalist greed led to the importation and breeding of more and more blacks. Today, their descendents pay the price.

    European kindness towards the jews

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    The muslim arabs and turks imported over 30 million black slaves to their realms over a period of more than 1000 years. Today there's little genetic trace of them in these countries.

    This is well documented. There's no genetic trace of those slaves because the arabs castrated as a condition of importation. What is there to not 'believe'? Nobody denies that the arab world heavily dealt in castrated slaves of many racial groups.

    And today, they have no black problem.

    Now you're calling arab people black people? You can't be serious.

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Arabs got a huge black admixture across both NA and ME.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Your confusing 'black' admixture with 'african' admixture. North africans are genetically different than sub Saharan Africans. We also know that northern african arabs have been in constant conflict with subsaharan african tribes like the Bantu. Look at the arab genocide by black tribes when the British pulled out Kenya in the 60's. There were pits of arab bodies as the blacks pushed into North African arab controlled areas and slaughtered them. The official story is that it was 'revenge' for thousands of years of slavery but that was really just a cover for black violent behavior. So if there is arab and black genetic mixing it's probably minimal because these two groups don't like each other very much.

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Your confusing 'black' admixture with 'african' admixture

    I'm not.

    North africans are genetically different than sub Saharan Africans.

    Yes and arabs in NA and ME have significant ssa admixture through interbreeding.

    So if there is arab and black genetic mixing it's probably minimal because these two groups don't like each other very much.

    You're right that they dislike each other but the admixture is there.

    [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Ok but your original comment seemed to be implying that arabs are just 'black people' which isn't really true and I don't think the admixture is as much as you think it is. Although maybe someone else in the sub that know the genetics can inform us both.

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Ok but your original comment seemed to be implying that arabs are just 'black people'

    Yeah that was wrong. I think its around 10-20% admixture, at least in some arab populations like the berbers

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    South Moroccans have 33% sub-Saharan admixture on average.

    https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-990b922bba92176c2f8c73e45e2064f6

    [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Speak of the devil. I just saw another thread that directly confirmed my line about Corporations.

    Thanks to JuliusCaesar225 for finding it.

    https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/85sg/bezos_donates_100_million_each_to_cnn_contributor/

    [–][deleted]  (46 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (43 children)

      Did blacks ever ask for this?

      When someone refuses a donation, they typically return it.

      But black people have neither returned the billions in free stuff given to them, nor have they left the USA and go back to Africa to get away from them.

      [–][deleted]  (29 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (28 children)

        If they don't apologize now, then the Hispanic majority that's predicted to take over in the future wont be anywhere as kind or charitable to them.

        Black Americans are left with two choices:

        1. Stop White Genocide in order to not lose their victim status when Hispanics take over

        2. Go back to Africa and return to the simple life of enslaving each other for thousands of years, like their ancestors did.

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Black Americans are left with two choices:

        1. Stop White Genocide in order to not lose their victim status when Hispanics take over

        Ok, why would you expect an entire race of people to stop anything at all? Outside of criminals, that's not something they're actively doing, and genocide isn't typically the fucking plan for criminals. The entire group of American black folks are not standing there with coat hangers at OB clinics that white people attend, they're not barring them from fertility clinics, standing in front of their bedroom doors and telling them they can't pregnant, they're not controlling their bank accounts and saying they just can't afford to start a family.

        I don't get your tactics here.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Nothing changed. I still agree countries like Zambia or Botswana are slowly getting better over time.

          But slavery has never been illegal in Africa, and it's more or less the natural order of things on that continent.

          We only saw the end of the slave trade thanks to British ships enforcing naval blockades on Africa, ironically.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_Africa

          [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

          Stop White Genocide in order to not lose their victim status when Hispanics take over

          "White Genocide" is a lie, "White Genocide" does not exist, Whites are not being shipped off to concentration camps or killing fields to be murdered in large numbers. Turks killing upwards of 1.5 million Armenians is genocide. The Nazis killing 6 million Jews and 4 million others is genocide.

          The term “white genocide” was first coined by American white nationalist David Lane while he was serving time for murdering a Jewish radio host.

          The falsehood of “white genocide” is pervasive. The people behind these murders share a common fear of the end of a white majority in U.S. And this dangerous myth is seeping into the mainstream, just as easily heard on the evening cable news as it is seen on flyers defacing college campuses.

          This radical and racist idea is now the animating principle of many of our elected leadership and the guiding light of the current administration. We’ve seen this idea become mainstreamed for three reasons:

          One, in the mid-1980s, 77 percent of the U.S. population was white. Today, it’s roughly 60 percent. In 30 years, it will be under 50 percent. This kind of change creates existential anxiety that, after being fed a steady media diet of xenophobia and fear, metastasizes into hate.

          Nobody is stopping white people from procreating.

          Shalom

          ✡️

          [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

          Please mods, ban this troll.

          [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          He's partially right.

          Whites are not being directly stopped from procreating in a strict sense. They are just being heavily propagandize not to procreate and since they are white people and only breed when there are enough resources the modern financial slavery whites are in is what's really blocking their procreation. White genocide is a reference to those attacks on whites not to direct physical restraint on breeding. Women voluntarily take birth control. Women voluntarily abort their babies. Men voluntarily watch porn and avoid socializing and breeding. Men voluntarily delay marriage and fuck around hedonically with multiple partners. Women voluntarily obsess for instagram likes or Only Fan payments.

          Of course there is a lot more nuance to this subject. You could make the argument that all these Jew led attacks do lead up to a very really physical restraint on breeding but /u/shalomeveryone is only trolling rhetorically not factually in this instance. He's allowed to keep commenting for now because he's a comically easy troll to counter. So easy in fact he makes me wonder if he isn't really on our side.

          [–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

          He's not an alt right troll. Have you debated with these people? His views completely line up with theirs to the letter. Even sutbtle things like bringing up the Armenian genocide but lowballing the number by half a million is a totally Jewish thing and not likely something you'd see an alt right troll do. There are tons of other little hints and clues that he's a legit zionut. The fact he brought up some Jewish radio shock jock that was murdered 40 years ago is a totally Jewish thing as well. You can find examples of dozens of whites murdered in what were likely racially motivated attacks just in the last several months alone, and this Jew still brings up some murder from like 1980. These people never forget.

          Whatever you do don't ban him.

          [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          The fact he brought up some Jewish radio shock jock that was murdered 40 years ago is a totally Jewish thing as well.

          I'm merely highlighting how the idea of "White Genocide" is pure lunacy. Genocide is the mass killing of people, whites aren't being killed en masse. I mentioned the radio host murder for a reason. The person who coined "White Genocide" is a murderous lunatic.

          You can find examples of dozens of whites murdered in what were likely racially motivated attacks

          Can you name any White victims who were killed by Jewish hate groups in the last months alone? Black hate groups in the last months alone? Or Whites killed by some run of the mill racist?

          Whatever you do don't ban him.

          Someone in a sub called s/debatealtright who has no problem debating someone with a differing opinion without calling that person a troll. You get what this sub is supposed to be, that is refreshing. No sarcasm or anything like that on my end, I'm 100% sincere.

          Shalom

          ✡️

          [–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          I mentioned the radio host murder for a reason. The person who coined "White Genocide" is a murderous lunatic.

          Who is claiming he personally "coined" the phrase? Sounds like some possible ret-conning to me. The fact he may have used the phrase doesnt mean he coined it, and it seems unlikely some dimwitted thug coined anything. I say this as someone who thinks the term white genocide is idiotic.

          This is a game that you guys love to play. Pick out a phrase, term or argument you dont like, find a bad man who once said something similar, then claim that anyone who says something similar is obviously a bad man. For instance cherry pick something Hitler once said, then claim anyone who ever makes a similar argument is an obvious Nazi who is just like Hitler. It's a childish tactic that only works on idiots, and using the same logic you could essentially ban any and all speech by finding examples of bad people saying the same thing, including banning all criticism of anyone white.

          [–]Erasmus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Of course you're a troll, Mr.:

          Shalom

          ✡️

          That's trolling.

          Another aspect of trolling is not debating in good faith. You know very well that the definition of genocide is not "the mass killing of people".

          From the Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity, quoting Lemkin:

          Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different *actions aimed at the destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups*, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be a disintegration of political and social institutions—of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups. Genocide is directed at the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed at individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group (1944, p. 79).

          The best word for this stage of the game is ethnocide, but ethnocide is simply a type of genocide.

          I'd encourage you to read more, but you know all this already.

          https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/ethnocide

          load more comments (1 reply)

            [–]peaceful✞ 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

            The conditions of genocide are forced (diversity, integration, assimilation, tolerance, immigration). All white countries are being flooded and force assimilated with tens of millions of non-whites. Blacks have practically a whole continent but whites can’t have a school anywhere on the planet. When whites flee they’re chased down with “diversity.”

            [–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            I agree and in that respect there is absolute force. White people didn't vote to be replaced in Europe or North America. When whites even mildly resist their replacement they are terrorized by the state and it's shock troops.

            My point still stands though that even with millions of non whites flooding into our cities and states there's no police force directly blocking white men and women from procreating. There are certainly pressures and soft power moves but no direct force.

            load more comments (1 reply)

              [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              Someone is a troll just because they have a different opinion than you do? What did I say that is trolling? Drawing attention to the fact that millions of whites are not being massacred therefore there is no white holocaust is trolling?

              Shalom

              ✡️

              [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

              I mean, trolling being obvious here, but as far as the procreating part goes he's sort of not wrong. Whether it be for pursuing a life of hedonism, being afraid of potentially fucking up another person's life, affordability, time, fear of overcrowding, etc.-- no matter the country, white people generally do not have many children if they have them at all. When they do they're nearly always religious fanatics or white trash.

              [–]peaceful✞ 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

              Under international law, genocide is any attempt to eliminate a group by any means. Killing is not necessary. Mass sterilization and force blending are two methods of genocide which do not involve killing. Mass non-white immigration plus forced assimilation in ALL white countries undoubtedly meets the definition of genocide under UN Resolution 260 Article II(c) “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

              Raphael Lemkin, the man who invented the term “genocide” stated: “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.”

              [–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              Using the term genocide is stupid and unnecessary. What is happening now is a lot of things, but calling it genocide is dangerous, especially since there is at least a real possibility that some of the ones responsible for shit like CRT and replacement level immigration would probably love to bring about a real genocide in the future but the numbers are still not enough in their favor. Mass ethnic cleansing is probably a more accurate term, but really the most accurate and least controversial and hence normie friendly term I've seen is simply replacement.

              What we are seeing is a continuously escalating propaganda war right now, so words matter. It's hard to take people seriously about what's happening when they throw around the word genocide.

              [–]peaceful✞ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              I understand your critique, genocide can be shrill-sounding, but on the other hand replacement isn't defined as a crime under law.

              [–]Erasmus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

              The proper term at this stage of the game is ethnocide.

              [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              Mass sterilization and force blending are two methods of genocide which do not involve killing.

              Where are Whites being sterilized en masse? Where are Whites being forced to blend with nonwhites?

              Mass non-white immigration plus forced assimilation in ALL white countries undoubtedly meets the definition of genocide under UN Resolution 260 Article II(c)

              No it doesn't.

              “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

              What is deliberately being inflicted on whites to bring their conditions of life to bring on its physical destruction? Whites have the most financial wealth in America. Whites have the longest life expectancy. Are there European countries in which whites do not have the most financial wealth and longest life expectancy?

              UN Resolution 260 Article II(c)

              I'm glad you brought that up Article II. I would have preferred you mentioned the entire article. How many whites would it have killed to include Part A, B, and D in your post?

              Article II

              In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

              (a) Killing members of the group;

              (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

              (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

              (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

              (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

              A. Whites aren't being killed en masse. If I am wrong, please tell me where they are.

              B. White group(s) are causing whites serious bodily or mental harm? If I am wrong, please tell me who is causing serious bodily and metal harm.

              C. Already mentioned above.

              D. Who or what is imposing measures to prevent Whites from being born? It's my understanding nobody is. If I am wrong, please tell me who is imposing such measures.

              E. Nobody is taking away White children and giving them to nonwhites. If I am wrong, please tell me who is taking White children away from White parents and giving them to nonwhites.

              Raphael Lemkin, the man who invented the term “genocide” stated: “Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation.

              He never said, "genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation."

              This is what he said about genocide.

              Lemkin defined genocide as “the destruction of a nation or an ethnic group.” He built the word, he said, “from the ancient Greek word genos (race, tribe) and the Latin cide (killing), thus corresponding in its formation to such words as tyrannicide, homicide, infanticide, etc.” He wrote, “Genocide is directed against the national group as an entity, and the actions involved are directed against individuals, not in their individual capacity, but as members of the national group.”This was an important element of the definition of genocide: people were killed or excluded not because of anything they did or said or thought but simply because they were members of a particular group.

              Shalom

              ✡️

              [–]peaceful✞ 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              He never said, "genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation."

              Incorrect. http://genocidewatch.net/2013/03/14/raphael-lemkin-defines-genocide-2/

              [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              Canada, the U.S, France, UK, Germany, Australia, Sweden and many more, are all projected to have a non-white majority populations in our lifetime.

              Call it "White replacement" or "White genocide", the effects are still the same. World governments are doing nothing to increase the share of White populations. They are in fact, complicit with watching it shrink and are importing more third world immigrants to deal the final killing blow.

              And when White people are officially minorities in their own homeland, they will have no representation in government to protect them. South Africa or Zimbabwe are examples of this. You only need to elect one Robert Mugabe as head of state, who will make demands that White people hand over everything or face consequences.

              [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              Call it "White replacement"

              It's not white replacement, no group of people are stopping whites from procreating like Black Americans and Hispanic Americans. There's a reason why the White American population is decreasing, White American Women don't act like using birth control is against the law. White women and White men are not being sterilized, if they want to have more White kids they are free to do so.

              World governments are doing nothing to increase the share of White populations.

              Because that's none of their business, no government should force Whites to have children if they don't want to. A person has the right to procreate or not procreate, it's up to the individual not the government.

              They are in fact, complicit with watching it shrink and are importing more third world immigrants to deal the final killing blow.

              Respecting a White person's right to procreate or not procreate does not mean there is any nefarious complicity. Governments should be in the business of telling people how many kids they will be having?

              And when White people are officially minorities in their own homeland, they will have no representation in government to protect them. South Africa or Zimbabwe are examples of this.

              South Africa and Zimbabwe are not examples of this. South Africa and Zimbabwe is in Africa, Africa is not the homeland of Whites. Europe is the homeland of Whites. In Africa, Whites were the invading and occupying force.

              You only need to elect one Robert Mugabe as head of state, who will make demands that White people hand over everything or face consequences.

              I don't see a nation like Germany, France, Norway, Finland, Belgium and England electing a Mugabe to rule over a White majority in their White homeland.

              Shalom

              ✡️

              [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

              t's not white replacement, no group of people are stopping whites from procreating like Black Americans and Hispanic Americans. There's a reason why the White American population is decreasing, White American Women don't act like using birth control is against the law. White women and White men are not being sterilized, if they want to have more White kids they are free to do so.

              Whites are already a minority in the world. India and China have populations that dwarf Europe, but they still send millions of immigrants anyway. That's not something you can compete against using birth rates or any other measurement.

              The only practical solution is to implement a quota system, which is what the U.S and many other White countries had before the 1960s, that prioritized importing White immigrants first.

              Because that's none of their business, no government should force Whites to have children if they don't want to. A person has the right to procreate or not procreate, it's up to the individual not the government.

              It is there business. Society can't survive when Whites are a minority, or more Old people greatly outnumber young people needed to care for them.

              Respecting a White person's right to procreate or not procreate does not mean there is any nefarious complicity. Governments should be in the business of telling people how many kids they will be having?

              See above. Governments must implement these policies to avoid going extinct.

              South Africa and Zimbabwe are not examples of this. South Africa and Zimbabwe is in Africa, Africa is not the homeland of Whites. Europe is the homeland of Whites. In Africa, Whites were the invading and occupying force.

              South Africa was empty when Europeans got there, and Zimbabwe was stuck in the stone ages before Europeans offered them a chance at civilization. Since these fuckers overthrew their governments and made life worse for everyone, it's safe to say Europeans were in the right to live there and stay in power given that the alternatives are worse.

              I don't see a nation like Germany, France, Norway, Finland, Belgium and England electing a Mugabe to rule over a White majority in their White homeland.

              So lets keep them majority White, instead of inviting more third world immigrants to displace them. That's what it means to stop White Genocide.

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Not at all.

                How many Blacks do you see moving to Mexico? When illegal immigrants from Africa arrive, they immediately keep walking towards the U.S border instead of staying.

                https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/06/26/why-record-numbers-of-african-migrants-are-showing-up-at-the-u-s-mexican-border/

                And even if they do try to accept "multiculturalism", the Hispanics are having none of it. Once their gangs start claiming new territory, Blacks will have no choice but to run.

                https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-ramona-hate-crime-20160707-snap-story.html

                [–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

                When someone refuses a donation, they typically return it.

                Did you really just call genocide, enslavement, and forced migration a "donation"?

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

                Africa has all those things sweetie. You may have even heard of the last big one in the 90s called Rwanda.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

                It's actually annoying why do only White people get brow beaten with this? Every race has slavery, but only Whites were expected to apologize. Hypocrisy much?

                On top of that, Blacks were still pretty much cared for. They were given free food and shelter in America. It was nothing like Haiti where the slaves were worked to death and quickly replaced with new ones.

                [–]Daddiescummies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

                Rwanda and neighbouring Burundi were assigned to Germany by the Berlin Conference of 1884,[32] and Germany established a presence in the country in 1897 with the formation of an alliance with the king.[33] German policy was to rule the country through the Rwandan monarchy; this system had the added benefit of enabling colonization with small European troop numbers.[34] The colonists favoured the Tutsi over the Hutu when assigning administrative roles, believing them to be migrants from Ethiopia and racially superior.[35] The Rwandan king welcomed the Germans, using their military strength to widen his rule.[36] Belgian forces took control of Rwanda and Burundi in 1917 during World War I,[37] and from 1926 began a policy of more direct colonial rule.[38][39] The Belgians modernised the Rwandan economy, but Tutsi supremacy remained, leaving the Hutu disenfranchised.[40]

                In the early 1930s, Belgium introduced a permanent division of the population by classifying Rwandans into three ethnic (ethno-racial) groups, with the Hutu representing about 84% of the populace, Tutsi about 15%, and Twa about 1% of the population.[30] Compulsory identity cards were issued labeling (in the rubric for 'ethnicity and race') each individual as either Tutsi, Hutu, Twa, or Naturalised. While it had previously been possible for particularly wealthy Hutus to become honorary Tutsis, the identity cards prevented any further movement between the groups[41] and made socio-economic groups into rigid ethnic groups.[42]

                The ethnic identities of the Hutu and Tutsi were reshaped and mythologized by the colonizers.[31] Christian missionaries promoted the theory about the "Hamitic" origins of the kingdom, and referred to the distinctively Ethiopian features and hence, foreign origins, of the Tutsi "caste".[31][43] These mythologies provide the basis for anti-Tutsi propaganda in 1994.[31]:421

                You're so stupid and racist, you're probably scared of your own shit.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                I don't see how that debunks what I said? Blame the Africans for not believing in "diversity is our strength"?

                Ohhhhhhhhhhh, I know what you're trying to do. You're trying to say Africans lived in complete peace before White people arrived. Sorry, but you're still wrong. Even without Europeans, the continent was always chaos.

                For example, it was considered a tradition to use captured slaves for human sacrifice rituals.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annual_Customs_of_Dahomey

                Since Dahomey was a significant military power involved in the slave trade, slaves and human sacrifice became crucial aspects of the ceremony. Captives from war and criminals were killed for the deceased kings of Dahomey. During the ceremony, around 500 prisoners would be sacrificed. As many as 4,000 were reported killed In one of these ceremonies in 1727.[5][6][7] Most of the victims were sacrificed through decapitation, a tradition widely used by Dahomean kings, and the literal translation for the Fon name for the ceremony Xwetanu is "yearly head business".[8] In later years this ceremony also included the spilling of human blood from the sacrificed.[4] Related with this, there was also a significant military parade in the ceremonies that further displayed the military might of the kingdom of Dahomey.[2]

                The only reason we don't hear more about this stuff is because Africans never really kept much documents or writing behind.

                [–]WorldSharp 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                chilling with dahomeys

                [–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                Remind me of all the genocides that happened BEFORE white people started state enforcement of racial social castes

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                Lol "state enforcement".

                Last time I checked, AFRICA HAS NEVER SENT A FUCKING SHIP to take back all their slaves from the New World. Why is that? Because Africans never cared about what happened to their own people they hunted down everywhere and sold to the highest bidder. There was never any racism. Black society has barely evolved past the stone age, and they remain undeveloped compared to the rest of the world.

                [–]Daddiescummies 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                Last time I checked, AFRICA HAS NEVER SENT A FUCKING SHIP to take back all their slaves from the New World

                Because they are all dead babe.

                Black society has barely evolved past the stone age, and they remain undeveloped compared to the rest of the world.

                Today I learned that "development" consists of slaving, genocide, and being a fat little virgin trying to justify slavery on the internet.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Because they are all dead babe.

                So that's the excuse? Why not take back all the slave descendants who are alive today?

                Since slavery is officially over, you're making the argument that White people shouldn't even be forced to live next to people that serve no purpose to them.

                Today I learned that "development" consists of slaving, genocide, and being a fat little virgin trying to justify slavery on the internet.

                Ironically, when Africa practiced slavery, development went nowhere. An industry based on trading humans like livestock has never quite lead to societies more advanced than the Bronze Age.

                When Europeans invented the steam engine, there was little use for agrarian civilizations. That's because strict human labor was being phased out in favor of more powerful machines that do the job better with less effort.

                [–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                What do you think this proves? That whites invented race and that made blacks genocide each other.

                Don't be ridiculous.

                [–]EuropeanAwakening14 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                So, you admit that the ruling elite use diversity to sow chaos? By the way, there are physiological differences between Hutus and Tutsis so it wasn't just something they made up. That write up is being disingenuous.

                https://www.quora.com/How-can-one-tell-whether-someone-is-Hutu-or-Tutsi

                [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                you're probably scared of your own shit.

                We're not scared of them, we're disgusted by them. You still don't understand our psychology. Leftists are the ones who are scared, of us. Every time leftists invent a new "phobia" it's projection.

                [–]FoxySDTWhite Nationalist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                What genocide? What enslavement? Blacks were already slaves in Africa before they were moved to America. And the only "forced" migration that comes to my mind is that of Southern blacks moving North. Blacks really don't appreciate how good they had it here.

                [–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Then send them back without a choice.

                [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                Blacks were gifted a 1st world civilization with absolutely zero effort involved.

                You intentionally misunderstand how victimhood works in the 21st century and the leftist understanding of african history. I will address both.

                First, victim capital is the most valuable asset a person or group can have. The current regime's policy is that all wealth and power should taken by force from non-victims and transferred to various victim groups. Acknowledging the advantages of living in the west diminishes the victim capital of blacks, thus it is mostly ignored.

                Secondly, the leftist version of history states that blacks were kangz who would have built their own civilizations, equal to, or greater than the west or Asia, had they not been sabotaged by evil white imperialists who created so much terror that even today are still responsible for any African underachievement.

                [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                First, victim capital is the most valuable asset a person or group can have.

                Nah. Just dont be white

                [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Good advice, but white gays, trannies, and feminists are cashing in as well.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

                They have access to opportunities now, but ancestors of US slaves had to go through quite a bit of hell and generations of time to get them. It's not like all those years ago they plopped over here off a ship and just started getting shit for free, man.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

                It's not like all those years ago they plopped over here off a ship and just started getting shit for free, man.

                But it was.

                All the hard work of establishing a 1st world society was already built by European Settlers. Do you think if African slaves were dropped in the middle of an American forest, they would have came up with Democracy, roads, running water and electricity, two story buildings, farms, an army that uses muskets and cannons instead of spears, a public school system and police department?

                Chances are, they would have starved. Whites gave them a place to live, and were forced to look after them.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

                Are you proofreading your own replies? We didn't have running water during slave times, they had wells and poop troughs for outhouses.. My grandfather's in his mid 60's, white, and bathed in the creek as a child. The same creek they kept their butter cold with, because all of the glories of what we think of when we bring to mind the first world were not available like they are now.

                I feel like you're possibly a bot, or just outright ignoring what I've said.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                So your grandad was born in the 1960s and was living in squalor? Sorry, but his experience doesn't explain indoor plumbing was actually around since the 1830s.

                Maybe you're a bot or paid shill?

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                Oh lord. I didn't realize that you were retarded. I'm sorry, you carry on with your day. Try not to get hurt.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                Say hi to Tel Aviv for me.

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Yep, says the pro experimental vaccination shill. Sure thing, darlin.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

                My grandfather's in his mid 60's, white, and bathed in the creek as a child.

                My father is older than that, grew up poor in a mining town without a mine, but had indoor plumbing and refrigeration. I don't want to argue, but that guy may have a point about your grandfather growing up in squalor.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

                We're talking the sticks up in Appalachia, miles away bathtub moonshine neighbors and what not. They actually had a pretty decent sized farm, later installed proper plumbing and refrigeration. I don't remember what my point was by saying anything anymore, honestly. I gave up after dude fucked up simple math.

                [–]EuropeanAwakening14 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                In other words, your grandfather was an outlier at the time?

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                Yes. My grandfather's family home and lifestyle growing up was not considered the norm. However, despite his situation being uncommon, I don't believe that it should be discounted because it proves that not even all white people were able to take advantage of everything on his list. There were still places that weren't privy to the modernities of most 1950s homes, and it's not necessarily because they weren't areas with industrious people.

                His original comment:

                Do you think if African slaves were dropped in the middle of an American forest, they would have came up with Democracy, roads, running water and electricity, two story buildings, farms, an army that uses muskets and cannons instead of spears, a public school system and police department?

                Police departments, public education, electricity, and running water as we know it were not things to be taken advantage of during the era of slavery within the US. Muskets and cannons don't make for much appreciation when you're the cannon fodder. It doesn't matter if you're shitting in a bush or an outhouse if you're not sure if you'll even be able to eat from day to day to create said shit. They didn't come here for opportunity, they came here because they were made to, and weren't promised any of those things for themselves or their ancestors down the line. I would say they sort of paid for the opportunities they eventually got.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                They didn't come here for opportunity, they came here because they were made to, and weren't promised any of those things for themselves or their ancestors down the line.

                You're missing the point. Those opportunities would not have came to them unless they were the lucky ones sent to the U.S.

                Remember, the slave trade had never been outlawed by Africans, and it was even possible much worse fates existed for them had they actually stayed. For example, look at the slaves who ended up in Brazil, Jamaica or Haiti? Even when they now control the country, do you think they're prosperous? The answer is no, and in many cases, they don't even have the basic necessities I pointed out, existed in the U.S since the beginning.

                Or look in actual Africa, where captured slaves who didn't get on the ships where just used for human sacrifice rituals. Getting their heads chopped off or even eaten. Had you told the Black slaves in America what life was like around the rest of the world, they would beg to not be sent back.

                And vice versa exists too. Would you rather be a slave in the Congo, or a slave in New York City?

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                When you live in a place that didn't have those "necessities" in the first place, you don't really know or understand what you're missing out on. We can say what we would have chosen, but we can't exactly ask them because they're long since toast. There's probably something to be said about having a chance to die in your own land among the people there, versus dying around an unfamiliar people treated worse than sentient oxen. You can look at their culture within Africa during that time and say that it's barbaric, I won't argue. I don't know what the dynamics were, if they were willing human sacrifices, if everything was entrenched in fear or a sense of duty, that's something that would require not only research but an examination of the bazillion different tribal practices of the specific tribes that came over to the US.

                Would you rather be a slave in the Congo, or a slave in New York City?

                New York City wasn't settled until 1624, and looked vastly different than it does now. It's also cold as fuck, and my spoiled ass is very used to a warmer climate that isn't inundated with snow. If you're asking me personally, is there a "neither" option? If you're asking a hypothetical slave from that era, who knows.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                When you live in a place that didn't have those "necessities" in the first place, you don't really know or understand what you're missing out on. We can say what we would have chosen, but we can't exactly ask them because they're long since toast. There's probably something to be said about having a chance to die in your own land among the people there, versus dying around an unfamiliar people treated worse than sentient oxen. You can look at their culture within Africa during that time and say that it's barbaric, I won't argue. I don't know what the dynamics were, if they were willing human sacrifices, if everything was entrenched in fear or a sense of duty, that's something that would require not only research but an examination of the bazillion different tribal practices of the specific tribes that came over to the US.

                Blacks continue to move to the U.S and other Western countries by the millions. Some are so desperate, they build dinghy rafts and float their way to Europe hoping a country picks them up.

                It's not a debate anymore. If Blacks didn't feel like they were missing out, why come at all? Why not have Africa send a ship to every nation and take back their slave descendants? The answer is simple: they wont go back because they know life is better here and they could never rebuild the same societies without a white person to help guide them.

                New York City wasn't settled until 1624, and looked vastly different than it does now. It's also cold as fuck, and my spoiled ass is very used to a warmer climate that isn't inundated with snow. If you're asking me personally, is there a "neither" option? If you're asking a hypothetical slave from that era, who knows.

                How do you think New York City was settled at all and why do people live there? Obviously it took Europeans to transform it into the high tech society it is now. But whereas NYC always existed on that path to prosperity, there is no evidence Congo was ever going to see better living conditions.

                In fact, even Muhammad Ali commented on what life was like in the Congo when he travelled there for a boxing match and admitted his great grandparents were better off being slaves taken to America, than staying behind.

                https://quotepark.com/quotes/1761571-dinesh-dsouza-better-off-the-point-is-illustrated-by-the-great/

                [–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Yes, they fought long and hard (AKA rioting) to get White people to give them free stuff and access.

                [–]Brewdabier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                100s of times.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqGbQJ5B8Q0

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xz575YtRnpA

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gifDHJ3wsIg

                [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                I'm just over here not caring while corporations make you commodities.

                [–]ShalomEveryone✡️ 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                Black Americans are not the only ingrates, White Americans are also ingrates. When have White Americans thank Jewish people for all the nice things Jewish people have done for them? Jewish bankers funded trips for Europeans to move to present day America. Jewish doctors and scientists are responsible for White Americans and Black Americans for having longer life expectancy as a result of medical breakthroughs discovered by Jewish scientists.

                Jonas Salk, born to Ashkenazi Jewish parents created the polio vaccine. Saving countless lives of White Americans and Black Americans 211. Did Black and White Americans thank Jewish people? I don't think so.

                Jewish bankers funded voyages to America from Europe going back to the 1500s. Jewish inventors, backed with funds provided by Jewish businessmen spearheaded the American Industrial Revolution making America a world power. Did Jews get a thank you? I don't think so. America has a higher standard of living because of Jewish people. No thank you was ever received.

                During World War 1 and World War 2, Jewish bankers lent European nations money, provided them with technology to fight back and defeat German aggression. Making the world a safer place for Blacks and Whites. No thank you was ever given. Who knows how many millions more would have died if Jews did not help the world defeat Nazi Germany.

                Jewish scientist, Gregory Goodwin Pincus, is part of a group responsible for the creation of the oral contraception pill. With the birth control pill, White Americans and Black Americans can now have kids when they are in a position to be able to afford to have children. Less people are now born into poverty because women have the power to decide when to have children. No thank you was received for helping children and families enjoy having a higher standard of living.

                If a police officer stops them, or if they rob a bank in New York, the government will say they are just "victims" of White supremacy and let them go.

                You're being disingenuous, bank robbers are still arrested and processed before being sent back out to the street. New York's bail reform applies to Blacks, Whites, Hispanics and Asians. Odds are you're talking about Gerod Woodberry, you conveniently left out the part where he was arrested on federal charges.

                Federal prosecutors will now seek to have Woodberry held without bail when he appears in court Sunday in the Jan. 10 robbery of a Chase Bank branch in Downtown Brooklyn, according to a press release announcing the criminal complaint against him.

                He’s facing federal bank robbery charges, which carry a maximum 20-year sentence.

                Donoghue noted that the Brooklyn robbery “was committed less than four hours after his release … a release required under recently enacted bail reform legislation.”

                The list goes on but Black people in America never had to do anything for the entire Western World to always come to their aid and defend them at all costs.

                Jews, being such a small population of the world built the Western World and all that is received for their accomplishments and contributions are scorn and anger.

                It is easily the biggest charitable donation in all of human history and yet, have Black people ever said "Thank You" to White people for giving them so much free stuff?

                Blacks and Whites both love free stuff, you never hear them thank Jewish people who make it possible for them to receive free stuff. To answer your question, no, Blacks have not said thank you just like Whites have not said thank you. Blacks and Whites alike love social welfare being that a lot of Black Americans and White Americans constantly receive social welfare from the government that was made possible by Jews.

                Shalom

                ✡️

                [–]shilldetector 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

                Interesting logic, I mean by the same logic Jews would also need to thank whites for the vast majority of scientific, medical and technological advancement mankind has come up with, from the light bulb to the computer and the internet your using at this moment. The automobile, the plane, the jet engine, the camera, the radio, the television etc etc. In fact in terms of invention damn near everything you enjoy was made possible by something a white goy invented somewhere down the line. They also created, built and sustained the very societies Jews built their wealth on.

                The fact you can find a handful of things Jews contributed to inventing, in fields white goys literally created, established and advanced from scratch, isn't particularly impressive to be honest. In fact in terms of inventions Jews are responsible for surprisingly little considering how much wealth you had to work with, wealth which itself consisted solely because your religion didnt bar usury like Christianity did.

                Also, ponder this. The very language you are using right now, the very language you likely THINK in, was created by the white goy cattle you hate so much.

                So on behalf of all white people I'd like to say, Your welcome!

                [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                I wouldn't bother responding. Let's use that great contribution to political discourse our wonderful Hebrew friends invented dynamic silence on this guy. He literally just posts the Jewish version of we wuz kangz over and over again with all the subtlety and historical knowledge of a black Hebrew Israelite-- hey could those two things have something in common!

                [–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                This is a debate sub. I'm all for debate. What's the point in ignoring him. Just keep in mind some of what he is doing is baiting people, but there's no harm in trolling him just like he's trolling. Having said that, I have no doubt he very much believes what he says. His Jewish supremacist mindset is very strong with many raging zionists and strongly identified Jews bathed in a culture of hatred and victimhood. A lot of them have a lot of power and influence too.

                Obviously not all Jews believe this, or even most, which is why people should be mindful of his attempts at baiting us.

                [–]EuropeanAwakening14 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Jews did all those things in White societies. What have Jews accomplished in their own civilizations? Jews don't even create their own empires of great civilizations, they just parasite off of Whites and Arabs.

                Anyway, Jews endlessly have their balls locked and groped by White members of the ruling class of White countries. Many Western European countries even have laws making it illegal to criticize Jews, so yeah, you comparison kind of socks. Hiw many White people do you think go to jail every year in the UK, Germany, and France for "anti-Semitism?"

                [–]peaceful✞ 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Jews have played an important role in promoting White genocide, see Culture of Critique.

                You don't thank White people for their accomplishments yet you claim Whites should thank you.

                [–]radicalcentristNational Centrism[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                When have White Americans thank Jewish people for all the nice things Jewish people have done for them?

                How about every single day? Only in a White majority country, will you find the government making it a crime to question Jews holding a lot of wealth or institutional power.

                https://www.state.gov/defining-anti-semitism/

                Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

                load more comments (1 reply)

                  [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                  Blacks are also the only race that get two choices of women to mate with. The media encourages them to date either Black Women to preserve their race, but the media also tells them they can have White Women too and many commercials show Black Men having White Wives given to them.

                  Almost half the women I've slept with were black, which admittedly isn't a high number. You can do it, but yeah, there is hostility towards it.

                  Black people are also shielded by criticism for every type of wrong doing imaginable. If a police officer stops them, or if they rob a bank in New York, the government will say they are just "victims" of White supremacy and let them go

                  That point I totally disagree with though. In college I used to wander around smoking joints and thought nothing of it. Two black guys I knew were totally fucked over it. When I did it, it was a harmless youthful indiscretion. They were treated like criminals.

                  You should see what they did to my former drug dealer. Dude's been fucked on bs legal charges for years now. Yeah, he used to sell some pot but they threw the damned kitchen sink at him.

                  I've known a few white guys who were literally walking pharmacies and they got sweetheart deals for "personal use" rather than distribution.

                  I don't fuck with that shit anymore but I've known a fair bit of criminals and it's definitely better to be white if you're going to break the law.

                  Although it's hard not to notice how very much "diversity" there is in violent crime. It didn't happen in a vacuum.

                  [–]Sonofzeus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                  And that’s precisely how they keep them enslaved shock troops to do their bidding and terrorize the goyim. It’s like a fucked up narcissistic parent spoiling their kid so they’re never able to fly the nest and live freely.

                  load more comments (1 reply)