all 49 comments

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (39 children)

America was actually very stable until about 2011-2012. As the Iraq war was winding down, the left needed a new cause to fight against, and this gave rise to the left targeting wealth inequality, the 1% wealthiest in America. Slogans like We are the 99% were created and there was legitimate opposition to the power structure. It got so bad that ABC was doing damage control by airing human interest stories on benevolent billionaires.

The elites quickly found a solution. The left was diverted from wealth inequality and redeployed in a newly created race war, starting with the astroturfed mobilization of leftists in the fight for #justicefortrayvon. Since then, the media has been manufacturing one race "scandal" after another, since there is an endless supply of negros who will inevitably get themselves shot for doing insane shit.

[–]thefirststoneThat's my purse! I don't know you! 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Something else happened around that time which is much more impactful: all-encompassing transgenderism.

It's seemingly absorbed all mental illness into itself. Do schools still have anorexic girls, emos, cutters, mildly-autistic spergs? They've all turned into trannies now, the new medical control, the evil-faced hormone replace. What a brave new world, with such people in it.

[–]Richard_ParkerHard-line, right-wing authoritarian 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Read Irreversible Damage by Abigail Shrier.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Have you finished that yet? I was looking forward to your post about your impressions of it.

[–]Richard_ParkerHard-line, right-wing authoritarian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have. Not sure if folks here want a review or synopsis. A whole lot was made of her being so Jappy.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, the transgender and gay normalization efforts also increased many magnitudes in intensity around the same time.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Transgenderism is merely one head on the Hydra that is progressive politics. As a concept, social justice did not really enter into popular culture until about 2012. It was an artificial movement pushed by megacorporations in order to derail the anti-capitalist leftists, who were making dangerous progress through Occupy Wall Street. This artificial movement succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, as we have seen. Social justice hysteria was able to completely neutralise the anti-capitalist leftists, and effectively lobotomise its adherents.

[–]MarkimusThird Positionist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We are just repeating the 60s, Post-Occupy SJW/'Woke' is just New Left 2.0

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree and say what we call social justice is just a rather cheap corporate repackaging of various strains of anti-fascist post war social engineering projects. It's all there. Sexual liberation, hyper individualism, xenophilia etc.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The New Left actually had some great intellectuals.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well to be fair the use of sexual liberation to further revolutionary aims goes at least all the way back to de Sade. 'Social justice' has existed for a long time before the corporations got their hands on it packaged it and mass produced it.

Did you see that article about the sexologist kentler I posted earlier? It's such an interesting read and I'd call what the west German state part of the social justice phenomenon. They would have called it anti-fascism but essentially they're all the same thing.

[–]JuliusCaesar225 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

2011-2013 saw the rise in influence of social media sites like Tumblr and more importantly twitter which caused the rise of the "woke" left. The woke left, formally called SJWs, then became the dominate form of progressive politics. Twitter also caused a dumbing down of poltcal discourse and hyper politicalization of society. Internet culture used to exist more separate from the mainstream culture but during this era it blends into one.

[–]socksnormal person AMA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

Yes indeed: these campaigns of hatred &c developed especially in the past 10 years, as a way of distracting people from the rise in income inequality that started with the Reagan Admin. The article partially addresses this, but not appropriately:

Spoiled elites—highly unappreciative of the New Deal’s populist approach and the decades of labor battles that created the pressure for change—turned a blind eye while corporate America worked diligently to return the American economy to Gilded Age levels of inequality and worker disdain.

and

[Michael Lind] “We become Peron’s Argentina,” he answered, without missing a beat. “It’s where I think we’re going to end up anyway. We’re showing signs of it ... your capitalists are mostly a rentier class, living off unearned income from banking, agriculture, finance, or stock sales … elites tied to the military and a nationalist coalition of interests. The working class is immobile. It cannot move at all.”

It's well-known that the "happiest" countries are known for a greater percentage of wealth parity, the middle class, social programs, healthcare &c, such as: Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Luxembourg &c.

I don't think most Americans hate one another, and the statistics do not show this. I do appreciate the approaches in the article, which cover interesting points. The news media and social media post many times on a daily basis videos of the craziest Americans, which makes these media complicit in reinforcing the idea that Americans hate one another. The vast majority of Americans are still known worldwide for being among the nicest, warmest, most generous people in the world. They're also known for their gullibility, relatively high poverty statistics for a "first world" country, and racists. What the article could address more specifically is that political corruption is eating away at the American Dream, which will be unattainable for most young people. The solution - in my view - is to vote out of office all of the old politicians, and replace them with people who have a record of supporting the 99%, at the expense of the 1%.

[–]AidsVictim69 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Yes indeed: these campaigns of hatred &c developed especially in the past 10 years, as a way of distracting people from the rise in income inequality that started with the Reagan Admin. The article partially addresses this, but not appropriately:

This is just naive leftist nonsense that tries to transmute all racial/ethnic/cultural issues into purely economic ones. The rightwing fetishization of Jews as the man behind the curtain simply morphs into capitalists. Wealth is used by the (almost universally liberal in character) rich to suppress racial forces, not encourage them. Racial conflict is not a distraction from rising wealth inequality, it's challenge to their ability to control it. To the extent they direct it now, it's to attack conservative whites and remove them as a potential nationalistic element that might impede their control. The best case scenario for the capitalists is to keep the Western workers as pacified as possible while creating a diverse a workforce as possible so that their ability to form cohesive opposition forces are neutered.

It's well-known that the "happiest" countries are known for a greater percentage of wealth parity, the middle class, social programs, healthcare &c, such as: Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Luxembourg &c.

Most of these countries are undergoing the same process of division and radicalization as migration and ethno-cultural stress increases despite more robust welfare states and lower income equality, they are just further behind the US in this process for demographic reasons primarily.

The vast majority of Americans are still known worldwide for being among the nicest, warmest, most generous people in the world.

No one thinks this.

[–]socksnormal person AMA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

So you disagree with most of what I wrote? Do the points in the article reflect your hatred of others? You've thus been manipulated by the 1% to hate other Americans?

transmute all racial/ethnic/cultural issues into purely economic ones.

That's not what I wrote. Read it again. (Economic inequality is fundamental to developments of other problems, even if the other problems already existed.)

The rightwing fetishization of Jews

Definitely not happening. Many of those right-wing assholes are Jews. Also the usage of 'fetish' does not work here, FFS.

as the man behind the curtain simply morphs into capitalists.

Poetry? Makes no sense to me.

Wealth is used by the (almost universally liberal in character) rich to suppress racial forces, not encourage them.

The opposite is true. I wonder why you or anyone else would think this.

Racial conflict is not a distraction from rising wealth inequality, it's challenge to their ability to control it.

Not true. Just look at how the 1% promotes racisim on websites and in right-wing organizations. Consider the dumbass parents protesting against the manufactured 'critical race theory'. It's a non issue meant to piss off dumbasses who enjoy racism. Students should learn about history. That's it. End of story. Deleting portions of history you don't like is fascism, to control the masses.

it's to attack conservative whites and remove them as a potential nationalistic element that might impede their control.

These fuckers (and Jews and the other 1%) are the one's promoting racism. They're not trying to remove themselves. They're in control.

The best case scenario for the capitalists is to keep the Western workers as pacified as possible while creating a diverse a workforce as possible so that their ability to form cohesive opposition forces are neutered.

Yes - we agree on this - but should also follow the money, to see how the 1% are gleaning everything from the 99% in the US. This will not work in the long term, but they're not concerned with the fate of young people.

Most of these countries are undergoing the same process of division and radicalization as migration and ethno-cultural stress increases despite

Yes - they're discussing immigration reform, and legislation was recently passed for the EU and the UK to come to terms with it. But this does not change the fact that those are the happiest countries, especially because of income parity &c.

The vast majority of Americans are still known worldwide for being among the nicest, warmest, most generous people in the world.

No one thinks this.

For you to say this is an indication that you've not been out of the country long enough to see it. The Bush Jr and Trump Administrations we periods when people in the US were seen as really stupid and foolish. Thus non-US opinions of Americans are gradually changing.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Just look at how the 1% promotes racisim on websites and in right-wing organizations.

What are you smoking? The 1% is literally funding BLM and other woke projects. The 1% is replacing whites.

[–]MarkimusThird Positionist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Borzoi said this the other day on telegram:

I'll talk to anyone who doesn't watch television about what I know.

But you can't talk to television watchers.

You're just arguing with the television and the television can't hear you.

I know socks is just a troll account pretending to be a gigaNPC libtard, but this applies.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I heard this argument word for word on reddit the other day when I was talking to a leftist about how all their social views were exactly the same as every CEO and attendee at davos. They counter with this idea that actually corporations are funding white nationalism too. Of course they can't point to any actual examples and usually just lump everyone from the federalist to breitbart to the daily stormer as all exactly the same and all promoting hate. It's so stupid.

Funnily enough the only other people I hear make the argument that it's actually part of some plan for the system to promote racial division are really low-tier older conservatives and conspiracy types. Turns out horse-shoe theory is real it just doesn't work how a guy like saegon thinks it does.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

corporations are funding white nationalism too.

No, this is how it works. FED-ops promote honeypot 'white supremacist' movements led by Zionist Jews to scapegoat white nationalism in order to discredit any caucasian, that might not even identify as a white nationalist, who questions the overt plutocratic agenda of making caucasians a minority or to scapegoat Esau and destroy Edom.

Now if corporations are funding 'white nationalism' it's Cointelpro groups such as the Proud Boys and various other kosher friendly movements used to tribalize Caucasians under the umbrella of Zionism in order to promote their form of ethnationalism.

Simply, watching the Mormon Jew Jan Irvin call the FBI on people who post Talmud quotes and they get subsequently raided is an obvious example of Jewish subversion. Jan is a lunatic but he also whines about crypto-Islamism and tries to scapegoat Islam to whitewash our Zioninst occupied government.

The more you watch these grifters the more you realize hoe much power Zio Jews have in the US. If they are not trying to demographically replace caucasians they are trying to gatekeep the narrative of white nationalism by racialzing caucasians under the tribalism of Zionism or at the very least utilising perception management to make people as soft and distracted as possible.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True, BLM is Marxist, though the assassinated BLM founder was against Zionism and the training of US police by a foreign military (IDF). So, he was on to something. Unfortunately, BLM is full of Jewish terrorists, Marxist-leninists and funded by corporations for inclusion and public relation purposes.

Yes, there is a conspiracy to end the Caucasian race through various forms of propaganda, economic watfare and enforced emigration by Rothschild and Co. We've heard many times plutocratic Jews embrace the destruction of Caucasians and exclaim their happiness for increased white male suicide. That being said, there's also the other side of the spectrum which pretends to befriend those against such propaganda hoping to tribalize caucasians under the radicalism of Zionism.

Watch out for both.

[–]socksnormal person AMA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We 100% disagree on this. There is no evidence for what you note, whereas you can see what the right-wing 1% want among those who support Citizens United, right-wing political hacks on the Supreme Court, have paid millions to right-wing politicians, who control the news and social media, and who fund the racist disinformation websites at /u/ShitpostNews. There is by contrast no evidence that any of these people are liberal or anti-white (whatever that is supposed to mean, though we see it a lot on Saidit).

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no evidence for what you note

https://www.cnet.com/how-to/companies-donating-black-lives-matter/

who fund the racist disinformation websites

Then why has the Alt-Right been deplatformed almost everywhere you look? Why has Amazon banned several Dissident Right books from their website? What you're saying doesn't make any sense.

There is by contrast no evidence that any of these people are liberal or anti-white

Just read the above.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Consider the dumbass parents protesting against the manufactured 'critical race theory'. It's a non issue meant to piss off dumbasses who enjoy racism. Students should learn about history. That's it. End of story. Deleting portions of history you don't like is fascism, to control the masses.

You're either trolling or you really are a delusional leftist.

By the way, there's nothing wrong with "racism". And your gaslighting about CRT isn't fooling anyone. Also, fascism is a good thing.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fascism for your cause is a good thing for you. Ziofascism is not.

[–]socksnormal person AMA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Again, we 100% disagree on these points.

By the way - consider the usage of gaslighting - which isn't what I've done, not in the slightest, especially on Saidit.

Moreover, in a fascist country, you would have no rights to say or do what you wanted, unless it was in agreement with the fascists. Fascism restricts freedom, as does racism, as does CRT. You seem to agree here with restricting freedom and facts (in history lessons). Saidit is literally not a place for you, if you don't support free speech.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

First of all, in a fascist country I wouldn't need to say anything that goes against the regime because I would be perfectly content with it. Secondly, freedom is overrated. Most people don't actually want to be free, they want to be secure. Most people in the West today are miserable because they're free. Thirdly, everyone - including the current liberal regimes - restricts freedom and facts to a certain degree. And finally, no one completely supports free speech, not even libertarians.

[–]AidsVictim69 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's not what I wrote. Read it again. (Economic inequality is fundamental to developments of other problems, even if the other problems already existed.)

Sublimation of all cultural and racial issues into economic ones is the basis of leftist thinking from liberalism to Marx and is what you're doing here, whether you understand that or not. It's an abandonment of materialism (i.e. genetics, literally the materials determining a large part of human behavior and capability) in favor of enlightenment ideals (tabula rasa).

Definitely not happening. Many of those right-wing assholes are Jews. Also the usage of 'fetish' does not work here, FFS.

Poetry? Makes no sense to me.

The opposite is true. I wonder why you or anyone else would think this.

The right (not mainstream conservatism, which fetishizes Jews in a different way) fetishizes (i.e. obsesses with and attributes extraordinary powers to) Jews in a similar way to the way the left fetishizes capitalist class (or 1% as you keep re iterating instead of class nomenclature for some reason, probably because your interest begins and ends at OWS catchphrases). The left believes that racial antagonisms are primarily a result capitalist manipulation to divide the working class - this is sometimes true out of convenience - but largely this is a misinterpretation of the character (which are almost universally liberal and enlightenment in nature) and motivations of the capitalist class. Racial antagonism is a threat to capitalist power structure for a variety of reasons, nor do they have the extraordinary powers necessary to engender these phenomenon. When it's used out of convenience (i.e. agitation propaganda against whites ramping up the last few years) they are exploiting trends that already exist and built out of the genetic and cultural bedrock from which they emerge. Ideally for the capitalist class the antagonisms would disappear and allow the full pacification of the working class and they actively work to achieve that using economic incentives (i.e. the blacklisting of anyone not fully embracing modernist morality) and propaganda.

More importantly the leftist explanation misunderstands that liberal capitalists are true believers in things like "white guilt", systematic racism, complete genetic equality etc. They do not promote and act on these things out of some utilitarian economic function but because they are fundamental aspects of their philosophy.

Not true. Just look at how the 1% promotes racisim on websites and in right-wing organizations. Consider the dumbass parents protesting against the manufactured 'critical race theory'. It's a non issue meant to piss off dumbasses who enjoy racism. Students should learn about history. That's it. End of story. Deleting portions of history you don't like is fascism, to control the masses.

These fuckers (and Jews and the other 1%) are the one's promoting racism. They're not trying to remove themselves. They're in control.

You are delusional about what the ruling class is promoting and believes.

Yes - we agree on this - but should also follow the money, to see how the 1% are gleaning everything from the 99% in the US. This will not work in the long term, but they're not concerned with the fate of young people.

I have no particular reason not to think it will work in the long term. The vast majority of people can be bought off with slight adjustments to tax rates and welfare. They are depressed, dependent on pharmaceuticals, self hating (if white), narcissistic ethno nationalists (if black or latino), losers who are totally unwilling to die or struggle in a way necessary to reform the system.

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The vast majority of Americans are still known worldwide... for their gullibility, relatively high poverty statistics for a "first world" country, and racists.

Did you not read the article, socks? Did you completely miss the part where it cited a study showing that ''greater diversity of ethnicity and national origin coincided with weaker cultural ties and greater social conflict in nearly every location and circumstance''?

If there are higher levels of 'racism' in America than in Europe, then it is because there is more ethnic diversity which creates tension. Are you just going to skip over that point because you disagree with it?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Europeans are actually more racist. Probably because we're the natives on this continent.

[–]socksnormal person AMA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I read those sections and I think the author wants to focus on supporting his thesis that Americans hate each other; thus he repeats examples of divisive rhetoric that have been used by political, news, and social media in recent years. All of this addresses supposedly inherent hatred among Americans, as if it's a result primarily of social anger, rather than anything else (like income inequality, which he saves for the end of the article, as a footnote to his main ideas). What he doesn't appropriately address is the undeniable and deep problem of income inequality. We should consider why he wrote this article. For example: do most Americans hate one another? No. Indeed, this article fits neatly within what /u/Jesus would call an intentional attempt by Zionist media (and Russian media) to stir up hatred and dischord in the US. There are academic studies of this approach by Russian sources, showing that they're focused on getting readers to fight over facts and extremes, the result of which is the election of authoritarians like Trump, who we know was compromised by Russian businessment to do whatever they wanted him to do (where possible). Where in all of this does Zionism fit? Much of what Israel and pro-Israel lobbies in the US focus on is sowing dischord among non-Jews, which helps with their right-wing political aims. One of the ways they do this is to make people believe statements like this:

If there are higher levels of 'racism' in America than in Europe, then it is because there is more ethnic diversity

This is not true for many important reasons. I've already discussed them on Saidit, but in a nutshell, my argument is that we should look at this historically. For example, ethnically diverse settlements around the Mediterranean over the past 4000 years, particularly in metropolitan centers, have resulted in great progress for those groups. Central to that success was trade. Those who don't want this to work have used their power to manufacture dischord and thereby control their sources of wealth while others are distracted with the dischord. What's partially ironic about this today is that the Jews who were expelled from those Mediterranean regions periodically over a period of 4000 years (thanks in part to their abuses of others) have been since the early 19th century using some of the strategies of those in power to sow dischord and thereby take control of important sectors in societies (banking, pharma, healthcare, entertainment, politics, etc.), from the Rothschilds to the present. The writer of that article agrees with this approach of sowing dischord. Ethnic diversity was never a problem. Money was the primarily problem, especially for the economically disadvantaged blacks and hispanics (and whites) who've been recruited or forced into crime because they had no other way of earning money, other than to clean toilets or pick strawberries. When the lower income people react to this - because of the absence of upward mobility in society - there is racial tension. Yes, people inherently dislike the 'other', but they are prompted to act on their hatred when they are miserable and have no money.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

[–]socksnormal person AMA 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks.

I discussed this research earlier, and recall that the data used for the analysis does not appropriately answer the research prompt, given the skewing of information in the direction of relatively new immigrants. This brings us back to the income inequality problem. If you invite a bunch of poor people to live next to you, will you immediately trust them? It doesn't matter what their skin color is. By contrast, hundreds of London properties have sold to Russian, Qatari, Saudi, Polish, Albanian, Serbian and Chinese developers over the past 20 years, somewhat in that order. Do native Londoners (including Brits, Jewish Brits, Pakistani-Brits &c), or even the new arrivals, "trust" one another immediately? Of course not. The erosion of trust question is the wrong question because everyone knows you would not immediatly trust a new arrival, even if they were as white as snowflakes. The other problem is that it's human nature to assume that people who look like you can be trusted, and the 'other' cannot be trusted. This is a no-brainer. What's important in this case is: what does diversity bring to the community. And the answer it that: it brings much more than does the process of inbreading with the locals, as was common in rural parts of some countries before the mid-20th century. After decades of generations in diverse metropolitan areas, one sees significant benefits. Large cities in the US "melting post" are an excellent examples of this. For what it's worth, we'll probably agree on the general necessity of restrictions on immigration, but we will not agree on the promotion of white supremacy groups and areas. This latter approach is counter-productive, divides people, and there are no historical examples where these arrangements were fruitful.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nice cognitive dissonance.

[–]socksnormal person AMA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Look up the term, cognitive dissonance.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. Indeed, this article fits neatly within what /u/Jesus would call an intentional attempt by Zionist media (and Russian media) to stir up hatred and dischord in the US.

Yup, agreed. I don't hate Americans, nor do I hate anyone but I'm not okay when FSB grifters conduct PsyOps on American citizens to sow division just as I am not okay with Zionists holding any form of public office (which is illegal); that last part will get me to be defined as a Nazi, and sure, that is what Nazis did, liquidated Zionism from government but Jfk and RFK also wanted to do this.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I don't agree with enforced emigration. That is, mass emigrating culturally different demographics to demographically stable and homogenised rural areas for the sole purpose of destroying that area. Most know that corporations are doing this to many towns in Maine. In fact, although i don't agree with everything in this book, it is a great read, despite the infrequent Trump praise, though the author has no renounced him completely.

'The Way Life Should Be' by John Q. Publius

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/53447145-the-way-life-should-be

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ethnic diversity was never a problem. Money was the primarily problem, especially for the economically disadvantaged blacks and hispanics (and whites) who've been recruited or forced into crime because they had no other way of earning money, other than to clean toilets or pick strawberries. When the lower income people react to this - because of the absence of upward mobility in society - there is racial tension. Yes, people inherently dislike the 'other', but they are prompted to act on their hatred when they are miserable and have no money.

And yet, for some reason they don't place their hatred on their real oppressors.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

greater percentage of wealth parity

The countries you list have some of the biggest wealth gaps in the world. I think you mean income parity. Also, most of those countries are still relatively homogeneous.

replace them with people who have a record of supporting the 99%, at the expense of the 1%

Which means stopping immigration, right?

[–]socksnormal person AMA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

OK - a higher % of income parity

I don't favor out-of-control immigration, as this leads to crime and other problems that primarily benefit the 1% at the expense of the 99%. The 1% exploit the 99% when they can increase immigration for people who will work for them for cheaper wages. Republicans LOVE immigration but tell their supporters they hate it, as a way of supporting racism and other motivations what get people to vote. But the 1% in the US and Europe aren't really against immigration, as you may have seen. Many in the 99% are manipulated by the virtue signalling in news and social media to think about the welfare of those who try to immigrate. What we should remember is that jobs have to be available for these immigrants, or the 99% suffer. Centrist politicians (what few there are) who favor upholding strong immigration laws will help the 99%.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Republicans LOVE immigration but tell their supporters they hate it, as a way of supporting racism and other motivations what get people to vote.

We know Republicans are full of shit. We tell you this all the time. And "racism" is a good motivation. There's nothing wrong with it. The problem are all the politicians who don't actually enact racist policies.

What we should remember is that jobs have to be available for these immigrants, or the 99% suffer.

I don't care if jobs are available for them or not, I don't want them in our countries because they're not white.

Anyway, I simply reject your whole 1% vs. 99% dichotomy. It's too simplistic. The 99% have almost nothing in common with each other. They're divided among racial lines. There's no common struggle at all.

[–]TheJamesRocket 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Its very surprising to see such commentary in a magazine like Tablet. The author accurately diagnoses the problems facing contemporary American society, and makes reasonable conclusions about what the end result will be.

He seems to be basing his views upon Charles Murrays book, and Robert Putnams book. They both address the disintegration of American society from different angles: Murray talks about how far the Democrat and Republican states have drifted apart in their lifestyles and values, while Putnam discusses the atomisation of the American people and how transient their social networks are.

The author recognises how intensely polarized the U.S. is, and how there is no signs of this abating. The Left may have won the culture war, but they have not managed to subdue the Right. The things that are valued by the Left have been rejected by the Right, so unless there is an actual war, the issue will not be settled. The country will remained divided and polarized, and the chaos will not end.

[–]Wrangel 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Elites want to preserve themselves and don't want to rock the boat too much. The jewish oligarchy might hate white people, but they don't want to go Haiti or Zimbabwe. In the end elites want a relatively stable country that slowly changes in their direction and the current trend is rapid destabilization.

Immigration is being reduced by Biden, he is investing in programs that benefit ordinary americans while antifa and BLM have been told to stand down. The elites want to calm things down and boil the frog slowly.

[–]TheJamesRocket 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What makes you think that Biden is tamping down on immigration? Or that he is helping the American people?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Great effortpost. Thanks. This is useful stuff.

[–]send_nasty_stuffBronze Age Mindset 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So I was thinking instead of building that wiki book all at once we could essentially create it as quality threads are created. So if someone makes a good post on race realism or zionism or paganism or trad Catholicism that's when we create that page and build it. It will be a slow process but a lot less stressful than trying to write it all in one week.

This post could be filed under 'The failing republic' or something like that.

Our book would basically become a store house of all the effort posts on the sub.

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, it's got to be a background task, all of us are probably too busy to devote a week.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Nah, Zionist Jews create division in order to destroy Esau and Edom. Corporations created the wealth inequality that knows no race or skin color, except for the religion of Judaism.

[–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Communist Jews. Zionist Jews. Liberal Jews. What do they have in common? They're all assholes, and they hate anyone who isn't a member of their ethnic mafia.