"Actress and model" would have a special category of insanity much akin to Beauty Queen. I married a for-real Miss CA back in 1985 and spent remainder/next 23 years of a living hellish nightmare to Queen Bitch.She had a level of hatred I never could stop. Just whacko religious hatred and I was the target. Fucked her according to weekly/yearly calculations about 5,000x and did have 4 kids with her so my batting average there not so good. So, answer to your questions would have to involve "how long can a man put up with beauty insanity". My answer? 23 years for myself then kicked her to the ditch and walked away.

Y'all, pregnancy does not just take a toll on the "figure". Pregnancy can create total warfare on a woman's body, and childbirth is physically traumatic-- not bullshit trauma in the "omg, that booboo hurts my hoohoo" vein, actual trauma. The medical industry focuses on pain mitigation and provider convenience over mom and baby.

Let's draw a graphic mental image here: a woman sits at an angle with her legs up and bent, a baby far larger than any human penis is preparing it's exit strategy. Lo, mom's back is at an agle that is keeping the hips from fully extending and gravity is a real bitch that doesn't allow for a fair fight. Not only is she fighting gravity and the position she's forced into for "safety and monitoring", when she's allowed to push is controlled as much as possible by the medical staff overseeing the birth. Mom pushes, mom ends up with stitches and a fucked up pelvic floor, mom doesn't want to leak pee. Having back to back births will exacerbate this potentially to the point of actual prolapse or bulging of the pelvic floor organs into the vagina. Anyhow, to the point: the heavy duty medicalization of the birthing process has fucked women up and caused more problems in the long run. More medical interventions, more long-term post-partum problems, potentially long-term damage=money in the pockets. Guys, babies come at the expense of far more than just a woman's physical appearance.

Drop dead gorgeous women like Sharon Stone, Rachel Nichols, Kate Bosworth, Talulah Riley and Charlize theron have no biological kids.

It's cause they're males.

Do beautiful women have less children? Any stats on this matter?

Combine this speculation with the fact that there's a huge reduction in male fertile sperm.

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, finds that sperm counts have dropped almost 60% since 1973. Following the trajectory we are on, Swan’s research suggests sperm counts could reach zero by 2045. Zero. Let that sink in. That would mean no babies. No reproduction. No more humans. Forgive me for asking: why isn’t the UN calling an emergency meeting on this right now?

A: This is what the banksters have planned for the public.

We're all tax slaves on a free range tax farm.
It's generally a fact. Death and taxes.
Unless you're wealthy, then it's just death.

The owners know how to manage "the (tax) herd".

The reduction in fertility is deliberate.
We live in a planned depopulation era.

Anyone who wants to make a "meaningful" personal contribution to depopulation, should hurry up and get the jabberwack.

On a related tangent: McAfee was murdered, because he figured out the scam, and he wasn't going to be a winning tax slave.

Murdered for taxes.

Every small law ends at the barrel of a gun.

Now they have enough tax treasure, so they're planning to skip the taxes scam and skip directly to "death" (for the public).